Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,379–13,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 22:20
13,647
+3
15 Sept 2026, 17:17
13,644
+10
14 Sept 2026, 00:59
13,634
+30
12 Sept 2026, 09:01
13,604
-5
10 Sept 2026, 08:55
13,609
-7
7 Sept 2026, 03:58
13,616
+5
4 Sept 2026, 12:37
13,611
-6
3 Sept 2026, 00:13
13,617
-5
2 Sept 2026, 00:03
13,622
+5
31 Aug 2026, 21:26
13,617
+1
30 Aug 2026, 18:15
13,616
+19
29 Aug 2026, 17:43
13,597
+10
28 Aug 2026, 14:54
13,587
+11
27 Aug 2026, 15:56
13,576
+8
26 Aug 2026, 18:28
13,568
+8
25 Aug 2026, 19:32
13,560
+4
24 Aug 2026, 21:46
13,556
+18
23 Aug 2026, 09:34
13,538
+27
21 Aug 2026, 22:37
13,511
+13
20 Aug 2026, 19:34
13,498
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.26%
avg views ÷ 13,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
717
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
48 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
5,022
Reactions total
166
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,082 reactions across 44 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
414
38.3%
🔥
344
31.8%
👍
205
18.9%
👏
115
10.6%
😎
4
0.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,082 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я хочу создать программу, которая подойдёт не одному человеку на приёме, а многим.
Звучит просто. На деле — самое сложное, что я делал. Потому что в кабинете я работаю с конкретным телом: смотрю, тестирую, подбираю. А программа должна работать без меня рядом. Значит, она обязана попадать в реальные проблемы реальных людей, а не в мои представления о них.
И вот тут я упираюсь. Со своей стороны на очном приеме я вижу…
Пациентка принесла заключение МРТ, а там строчка: «признаки межостистого неоартроза, отёк межостистой связки». И вопрос: это вообще серьёзно или очередная страшилка на бумаге?
Отвечаю честно: вот это — как раз тот редкий случай, когда находка на снимке действительно значит что-то.
▪️Что происходит
Остистые отростки — те бугорки, которые вы прощупываете по центру спины. Между ними в норме есть промежуток и связка.
…
Готовы заполнить небольшой опрос , что бы лучше узнать ваши запросы ?
Готовы заполнить анкету44%
Будет здорово, если после анкеты вы дадите доступ к видео Суставная Гимнастика60%
Не готовы заполнять никакие опросы4%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Детектив, который не раскрыл дело с первой улики 🕵️♂️
Представьте следователя. Он приезжает на место, находит отпечаток пальца. Одна улика. Дело не раскрыто...
Он плохой детектив?
Никому в голову не придёт так сказать. Мы понимаем: расследование — это процесс. Версия выдвигается, проверяется, отбрасывается. Выдвигается следующая. Плохой детектив — не тот, кто ошибся в первой версии. Плохой — тот, кто вцепился в п…
💊 Вам их кололи? Витамины группы B от боли в спине
Почти каждый, кто приходил к неврологу с болью в шее или пояснице, выходил с одним и тем же назначением. Ампулы. Курс десять уколов. Болючих.
И почти каждый потом спрашивал себя: а оно вообще работает?
Я снял видео, где разбираю это честно — по исследованиям. Не реклама и не антиреклама: я не назначаю и не отменяю вам препараты через экран. Просто показываю, что и…
Два года — и первая прогулка без боли❗️
Расскажу историю, которая началась совсем недавно.
Женщина обратилась ко мне с болью в тазобедренном суставе. Болит два года. Не остро, не «скорую вызывать» — а вот это тягучее, каждодневное: больно долго идти, больно вставать после сидения, больно надевать носок.
⏺ МРТ показала выраженные изменения — то, что принято называть артрозом. Ограничение движения, боль, и главное —…
Сколько на самом деле восстанавливается нерв после сдавления корешка❓
Это вопрос, который мне задают чаще всего. И почти всегда человек ждёт ответа «две-три недели».
А правильный ответ начинается с цифры «один миллиметр в сутки».
Сейчас объясню, откуда она берётся и почему меняет всё представление о сроках.
Представьте нерв как кабель. Внутри жила — аксон, по ней идёт сигнал. Снаружи изоляция — миелин. Когда грыж…
❗️От приседаний вылетают суставы — написали мне вчера в комментариях.
Хорошо. Давайте посмотрим, откуда у этой фразы растут ноги. Спойлер: из 1961 года и самодельного прибора, который никто никогда не проверял.
Как родился миф⬇️
В конце 50-х доктор Карл Кляйн из Техаса решил выяснить, почему у американских футболистов так много травм колена. Он осмотрел 128 тяжелоатлетов с Панамериканских игр 1959 года и сравнил и…
ПРИЕМ В МОСКВЕ ❗️
В эту субботу прием в Москве
записаться можете по ссылке ⤵️
ВЫБРАТЬ ВРЕМЯ 🚨
.
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @doctormalyshev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Готовы заполнить небольшой опрос , что бы лучше узнать ваши запросы ?
Готовы заполнить анкету44%
Будет здорово, если после анкеты вы дадите доступ к видео Суставная Гимнастика60%
Не готовы заполнять никакие опросы4%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Доктор Епифанов | Невролог| Все о позвоночнике @epifanovnews · 49,123 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор Малышев” (@doctormalyshev), 13,647 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctormalyshev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.