Channel
@dogsl1fe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
84,266subscribers
-909 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001273867200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dogsl1fe |
| Description | Номер заявления РКН: 7706831491 |
| Created | 8 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dogsl1fe |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 84,266 | -50 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 84,316 | -93 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 84,409 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 84,419 | -115 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 84,534 | -580 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 85,114 | +458 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 84,656 | -55 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:44 | 84,711 | -62 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:53 | 84,773 | -32 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 84,805 | -39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 84,844 | -52 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 84,896 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 84,887 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 84,895 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 84,903 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 84,946 | -54 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 85,000 | -63 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 85,063 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 85,061 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 85,065 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (23 July 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,257,600 |
| Reactions total | 45,857 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 00:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109,784 reactions across 49 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5382265643103987288 | 45,059 | 41.0% | |
| custom 5382002945724296084 | 38,152 | 34.8% | |
| custom 5382174082991166262 | 26,573 | 24.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я не знаю когда я сделаю этот альбом но когда сделаю вы так ахуеете что не выхуете больше никогда
custom 53822656431039872882,460custom 5382002945724296084978custom 5382174082991166262744
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53821740829911662621,420custom 5382265643103987288755custom 5382002945724296084608
TARTARIE
custom 53820029457242960842,870custom 53821740829911662621,280custom 53822656431039872881,060
Channel photo updated
cowboys of the wild east
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 5382265643103987288369custom 5382002945724296084143custom 5382174082991166262129
важный вопрос ковбои зипка или худи?
custom 5382265643103987288598custom 5382002945724296084233custom 5382174082991166262192
📺 ЧТО ПОСМОТРЕТЬ с SALUKI Новая пятница — новая подборка контента на выходные. В этот раз от Saluki! Saluki (Арсений Несатый) — российский хип‑хоп‑исполнитель, продюсер и основатель лейбла Carnival Records. Что из этого смотрели? Кого позвать следующим? #чтопосмотреть@nerds
custom 5382002945724296084436custom 5382265643103987288185custom 5382174082991166262138
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53822656431039872882,510custom 5382002945724296084898custom 5382174082991166262753
утепляемся заранее
custom 5382174082991166262420custom 5382002945724296084161custom 5382265643103987288131
Posted without readable text
custom 5382002945724296084459custom 5382265643103987288201custom 5382174082991166262146
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5382265643103987288886custom 5382174082991166262317custom 5382002945724296084275
looking for tartaria
custom 53820029457242960841,700custom 5382174082991166262660custom 5382265643103987288560
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @dogsl1fe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@dogsl1fe edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
cowboys of the wild east
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 66 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 78 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SALUKI” (@dogsl1fe), 84,266 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dogsl1fe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.