Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дом и Двор | ЖКХ

Channel

Дом и Двор | ЖКХ

@domidvor

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,741subscribers

-232 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076112920
TypeChannel
Username@domidvor
Created17 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/domidvor

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,74112,97312,8576 August 2026 — 12,973 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,973 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,958 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,943 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,938 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,937 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,938 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,930 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,934 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,930 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,923 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,917 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,863 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,855 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,852 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,833 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,828 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,814 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,810 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,806 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,798 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,779 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,758 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,752 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,750 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,744 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,741 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -232. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,706–13,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:0112,741-3
16 Sept 2026, 20:3812,744-6
14 Sept 2026, 23:0012,750-2
13 Sept 2026, 09:2112,752-6
11 Sept 2026, 12:2012,758-21
8 Sept 2026, 20:1712,779-19
5 Sept 2026, 12:5812,798-8
2 Sept 2026, 05:3512,806-4
1 Sept 2026, 05:1612,810-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:4312,814-14
30 Aug 2026, 11:0412,828-5
29 Aug 2026, 11:3412,833-9
28 Aug 2026, 12:3412,842-10
27 Aug 2026, 11:3212,852-3
26 Aug 2026, 09:0212,855-8
25 Aug 2026, 09:2812,863-9
24 Aug 2026, 08:1812,872-21
22 Aug 2026, 17:0812,893-5
21 Aug 2026, 06:2312,898-19
20 Aug 2026, 04:2212,917first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.52%
avg views ÷ 12,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held37 (16 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total14,116
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

765 reactions across 34 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23530.7%
🔥8110.6%
🤔7810.2%
🤬688.89%
567.32%
😁536.93%
🤡293.79%
👎273.53%
263.40%
🤷‍♂263.40%
😱202.61%
😡192.48%
👏121.57%
🤣91.18%
🤝81.05%
60.784%
👀40.523%
💯20.261%
😢20.261%
🤯20.261%
2 further kinds20.261%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,920 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Основные изменения в ЖКХ с 1 сентября 2026 года В соответствии с установленными правилами уже традиционно важные законодательные изменения всегда происходят с 1 марта или с 1 сентября. ⏰ Поэтому расскажу об основных изменениях в законодательстве ЖКХ с 1 сентября 2026 года. 👇👇👇 ✍️ Протокол общего собрания собственника о выборе совета многоквартирного дома дополнительно должен быть подписан выбранными членами совет

5👍32🔥2🤔1

28 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,230 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Достигла минимального уровня доля россиян, отметивших заметный рост цен и тарифов на жилищно-коммунальные услуги 👉 Фонд общественного мнения (ФОМ) опубликовал текущие данные по результатам еженедельного опроса 21-23 августа 2026 года. 📉 По итогам опроса выяснилось, что доля россиян, считающих, что цены на ЖКУ заметно выросли, достигла минимального уровня более чем за год. ❗️ Теперь доля таких граждан сейчас соста

🤔5👍4👎3🤝3😁21

28 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,010 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @domidvormosPhoto

В Москве изменили нормативы озеленения для жилой застройки Вышло, но ещё не опубликовано постановление Правительства Москвы от 18 августа 2026 г. № 2260-ПП, которым меняются и уточняются нормативы озеленения территорий жилой застройки. 🌳 Об этом написали коллеги, и я процитирую основные моменты, которые они «вытащили». 👇👇👇 Для территорий преобразования норматив озеленения ЖК по-прежнему составляет суммарно 5 кв. м

👎163👍31🤬1

26 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,150 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Отозван законопроект об обязательном нотариальном удостоверении сделок с недвижимостью Менее двух месяцев назад Мособлдума внесла законопроект № 1278249-8, которым предусматривалось ввести обязательное нотариальное удостоверение сделок по недвижимости. 👉 В этом случае появилась бы обязательная нотариальная форма для сделок по недвижимости, а нотариус должен был бы проверять законность сделки, включая: выясняет обст

🤔7🤷‍♂6👍32🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC960 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @domidvormosPhoto

Что будет с ценами на новостройки Москвы с учетом новых требований к обеспеченности парковочными местами Количество парковочных мест во дворах и на подземных/наземных парковках – вечный вопрос для обсуждения в домовых чатах и на мероприятиях. 🚗 Жители всегда хотят, чтобы застройщики планировали как можно больше парковочных мест по принципу «чтобы всем автолюбителям хватило». 📝 В столице услышали зов жителей и приня

🤔52👍2🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,310 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

"Совершенствование законодательства, регулирующее работу ТСЖ" Посетил мероприятие "Совершенствование законодательства, регулирующее работу ТСЖ", которое проходило сегодня в Московской ТПП. 👉 Основная цель — обсудить подготовленный рабочей группой Минстроя России (о чем я уже писал) законопроект, касающийся совершенствования работы ТСЖ и направить предложения в представленный законопроект. 🗣 Среди спикеров были: Ра

🤔5👍2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @domidvor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Управдом | ЖКХ
@upravdom_channel · 31,801
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
ЖКХ
@gkhvsem · 40,450
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дом и Двор | ЖКХ” (@domidvor), 12,741 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/domidvor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.