Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 董志民思想研究

Channel

董志民思想研究

@dong8964

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,471subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835702634
TypeChannel
Username@dong8964
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dong8964

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,32911,54511,4377 August 2026 — 11,346 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,346 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,346 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,338 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,335 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,342 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,345 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,332 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,329 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,365 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,383 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,387 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,392 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,386 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,384 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,385 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,382 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,383 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,375 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,374 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,373 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,377 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,376 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,373 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,370 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,447 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,502 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,527 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,545 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,529 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,490 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,516 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,502 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,490 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,487 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,481 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,478 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,477 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,472 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,469 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,468 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,469 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,471 subscribers11,4717 August 202622 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 76 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,297–11,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 19:2811,471+2
21 Oct 2026, 16:4111,469+1
20 Oct 2026, 15:3911,468-1
19 Oct 2026, 14:0411,469-3
18 Oct 2026, 16:0611,472-5
17 Oct 2026, 16:2711,477-1
16 Oct 2026, 19:2011,478-3
15 Oct 2026, 17:2811,481-6
14 Oct 2026, 14:5611,487-3
13 Oct 2026, 04:0011,490-12
8 Oct 2026, 19:3711,502-14
4 Oct 2026, 11:0211,516+26
26 Sept 2026, 00:3811,490-39
19 Sept 2026, 07:3611,529-16
17 Sept 2026, 00:1911,545+18
15 Sept 2026, 02:2111,527+25
13 Sept 2026, 12:2011,502+55
11 Sept 2026, 14:5811,447+77
9 Sept 2026, 01:3711,370-3
5 Sept 2026, 14:4111,373first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 68 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 26s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,809 reactions across 66 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍32317.9%
😁27515.2%
🫡26914.9%
🤮23613.0%
💯1307.19%
🍾663.65%
💩623.43%
🙏553.04%
🤬432.38%
❤402.21%
✍321.77%
🤝311.71%
🤣281.55%
👏271.49%
😱261.44%
💅251.38%
🤡231.27%
😭221.22%
🥰150.829%
😢140.774%
15 further kinds673.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,809 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC427 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026

孙宇晨、景甜老妈子、胡锡进的事,今天本频道好好谈谈我们的看法。 八月底,孙宇晨把此烂事公之于众,引发舆论的滔天海啸。胡老龟立刻跳脚,连篇累牍地谴责,一口咬定孙宇晨“侵犯隐私”。 首先,孙宇晨人品如何、炒币是发财也好,割韭菜也罢,跟这桩事半毛钱关系都没有。在他跟景老妈子这件事上,他就是彻头彻尾的完美受害者。他把事情和盘托出,本频道不仅认为完全正当,更认为他做得太迟了!至于胡老龟那套“侵犯隐私”的鬼话,既坏又蠢,坏到骨子里,蠢到令人作呕。 还记得胖猫和谭竹吗?胖猫倒是尊重谭竹的隐私了,一个人默默咽下所有屈辱,悄无声息地走了。结果呢?你们放过他了吗?你们给过他哪怕一丁点公道吗?你们把谭竹的敲诈勒索美化成“正常恋爱”,把那些给胖猫点外卖的同情者扣上“扰乱社会秩序”的帽子,连3·15晚会都要拿出来批判,说人家“浪费粮食”。 景老妈子,不过就是个放大版的谭竹!孙宇晨只不过拒绝再当那个沉默的胖猫,选择把刀子捅出来,让所有人看清楚。你景…

👍22👏5😁3❤2💯2💊1

1 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC599 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

“就算是违法犯罪又怎么样”

🤮16💩2😁2💅1🤷‍♀1

1 Sept 2026, 09:14 UTC730 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

孙宇晨发文正式回应胡锡进,向其请教彩礼的问题

👍31🫡11😁9

30 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC994 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

各位能做到吗?

👍43😁6❤2🫡2😭2

30 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC987 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

对照实验这一块,远香近臭这一块

🤬8💩7🤮3

29 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,340 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

胡锡进发文强烈谴责孙宇晨曝光“捞女”景甜,这并不意外。 回顾他以往的立场:大连工业大学“巴西牛排”事件时,他挺的是牛排;王水牛事件时,他同情的是那几百个复旦小仙女;如今孙宇晨把景甜的事摊开,他又立刻站出来谴责曝光者、维护当事人。三件事串起来看,逻辑倒是一以贯之。在他眼里,中国小仙女永远无辜,错的永远是男人。 这种世界观从何而来?也不难理解。他自己的女儿胡维佳据说就是一块“巴西牛排”,留学美国期间,老胡的妻子还专程过去当陪读妈妈。家门之内的风景如此,老胡早已习惯戴着绿帽过日子,并把这套“男人有罪、女人无过”的叙事内化成了公共言论。于是他一边在现实中当绿毛龟,一边在舆论场里继续为小仙女站台,既可怜,又可悲,还颇有几分自我安慰的讽刺意味。

😁37💩5🤮2🌭1

29 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈1,250 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

这就是孙哥文中说的那张2007年景甜的广告宣传图,这种的有感觉吗?

💩27🌭5🤮1

26 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC≈1,690 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

李雪女士,你作为一个大龄女性至今未婚,很能理解您内心的焦虑。但是您找不到男性结婚就整天在b站疯狂打拳的行为也是不对的。由于你经常在b站发表女拳言论,造成不良影响,本频道现对你予以正义出道 姓名:李雪 交流热线:18086801144 自然女代码:513127198708173228 b站账号:游乐园在前面左边 自然女修炼洞口:四川省成都市东城拐下街8号附15号

😁32🤮27🍾5💩5👏3❤1🤡1

24 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,680 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @huanyutv

喜欢群聊的男生:肥胖,爱撸管,意淫自己在网络上呼风唤雨,认为自己文采好 喜欢群聊的女生:抑郁,爱自闭,喜欢玩弄那些撸管男,经常在朋友圈发布身体部位自拍,然后删掉

❤10💩3🌭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @dong8964. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dong8964 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“董志民思想研究” (@dong8964), 11,471 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dong8964.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.