Channel
@dongdongl112
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,374subscribers
+607 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003509568452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dongdongl112 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dongdongl112 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 3,374 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 3,355 | +83 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 3,272 | +215 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 3,057 | +264 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 2,793 | +25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 2,768 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2,767 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,522 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
半岛嫩妹会报告模板： https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【妹子花名】：安安 【联系方式】：@wandoudo1 【妹子年龄】：23 【验证留名】：zrq 【验证时间】：8月29日 【大概位置】：南站附近 【修车水费】：1500pp 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】：人照相似程度9.5分，真人比照片更好看 【身高身材】：身高腿长160左右，没有纹身，皮肤又嫩又白 【凶器罩杯】：大小b到c之间，手感好，纯天然， 【湿度紧度】：颜色正常，湿度还行，紧度还行，周围毛量正常 【环境细节】：出入方便，房间整洁 【个人卫生】：没有抽烟，有漱口水/牙刷/浴巾，事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】：开课是准时，排课是宽松，课时是做完 【服务点评】：服务到位，无少做，过程无机车 【推荐程度】：✅ 差评 中评 中好评 …
🈵
麻烦控制好你的魅力， 我怕自己忍不住亲你😘
杭州爆破严选认证报告模板 https://t.me/HZBPYXQ 【老师艺名】#安安 【老师 I D :】@wandoudo1 【出击时间】8月25日 【大概位置】萧山 南站 【狼友账号】 【开课价格】800 【老师类型】御姐&嫩妹 【大概年龄】23 【客观评价】超级好评 各项满分为10分，软件.硬件各50 综合100分 硬件:9 颜值 8.7分 身材 9分 胸型 8.9分 户型 8.7分 水量紧度 9分 硬件评分:9.2 软件: 服务态度 8分 服务技巧 8分 屌感 9分 啪啪反馈 9.5分 突出技巧 8分 软件评分:9 综合评分:9 软件硬化工程施工过程: 看安安好几次了，一直犹豫，害怕是那种年龄比较大的，鼓起勇气一去，发现原来是嫩妹，ls年纪正经比较小，脸看上去稍微成熟些，但皮肤一看就是嫩妹的状态，人也很白，身材正正好好，身子跟其他评价一样，软软的。浴室比较小，但这么小…
宝宝们可以约课了
开课了哦
明天休息一天，后天见
🈵
开课啦，哥哥们可以预约哦，明天有事休息一天
https://t.me/anansxt78_bot?start=e47929c2 福利更新啦
遇见你之后我不再抱怨生活， 只想抱你🥰🥰🥰
🈵
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dongdongl112. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“安安的秘密花园” (@dongdongl112), 3,374 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dongdongl112.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.