Продолжаем делать контент?
- Да87%
- Нет13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@doniwq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
12,095subscribers
-430 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002478077959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doniwq |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doniwq |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 12,095 | -13 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 12,108 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 12,129 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 12,145 | -26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 12,171 | -21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 12,192 | -36 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 12,228 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 12,241 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:43 | 12,258 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 12,270 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 12,280 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 12,294 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 12,302 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 12,310 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 12,320 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 12,336 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 12,351 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 12,357 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 12,380 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 12,396 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
571 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 393 | 68.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 108 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5251594604607724240 | 37 | 6.48% | |
| 🍓 | 33 | 5.78% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаем делать контент?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Один мой подопечный 40+ ведет довольно подробные записи своих тренировок, питания, силовых показателей и даже анализов. И знаете, недавно он познакомил меня со своей статистикой по тестостерону по годам, начиная с 21го. С каждым годом его уровень тестостерона становится все выше и выше, а последний год он совершил самый большой скачок, что я, будучи довольны тщеславным человеком, отчасти отношу и к своим заслугам. Вс…
❤12custom 52515946046077242402
Стабилизация адаптации 🟢Большинство современных программ направлены на форсирование адаптации, в то время, как программы, которые публикую я - просто "позволяют ей случиться". Это огромная разница. Как тренировка силы и ее демонстрация. Многие не способны самостоятельно разглядеть эту разницу, однако, как мне кажется, мы сумели наглядно продемонстрировать ее в рамках прошедшей тестовой группы. Участники получили вес…
❤5
"Имейте терпение. Всё кажется трудным, до того, как станет простым." (Саади) Не путаете ли вы прогресс и достижение пика в своих тренировках? Прежде чем вы закатите глаза и скажете: "Конечно, нет!" - прочтите. ♦️Пик — это временное состояние — итог тренировочных усилий, направленных на то, чтобы быть в оптимальном состоянии к конкретной дате, например, к намеченным соревнованиям. Новый личный рекорд, установленный…
❤4custom 52515946046077242401
⚫️Прогрессия нагрузок⚫️ Для того, что бы ваш организм продолжал адаптироваться и становиться сильнее, требования к нему должны так же возрастать. Сегодня этот факт не просто не является секретом, но даже и в качестве бесплатного совета звучит, как банальность. Но какие инструменты для прогрессии нагрузок существуют? Убедитесь, что в вашем арсенале присутствуют если не все, то хотя бы большинство. 1️⃣Увеличение веса…
custom 52515946046077242404❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤22❤🔥6
Часто спрашивают, что за лестницы повторений и для чего они? Почему бы не выполнять традиционные классические подходы? Вы безусловно можете так поступать и все равно будете получать довольно хорошие результаты, Лестницы - лишь один из дополнительных вариантов оптимизации нагрузки, который я использую. Не претендую на методическую истинность, однако, скорее всего вы здесь, потому что видели результаты людей, с которы…
❤19custom 52515946046077242404
Линейный цикл на статичном RPE В этой статье я расскажу вам о чрезвычайно примитивном, но в то же время отлично работающем стиле тренировок, который я использовал будучи подростком во время самого выраженного роста силовых показателей со штангой. Поскольку теперь вы куда умнее, чем был в свое время я, вы уже знаете, какие программы можно называть линейными и что такое RPE. Фактически, в тот период времени я не знал …
❤22🍓3❤🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤281❤🔥101🍓30custom 525159460460772424024
Интенсивность тренировок по моим наблюдениям обсуждается чаще других параметров. Соперничать с ней в этом может разве что тренировочный объем, в то время, как остальные аспекты тренировок часто остаются без внимания. Но что же такое интенсивность? Это не уровень эмоционального напряжения при выполнении упражнений (тяжело/легко) и не близость к отказу. Интенсивность - это вес снаряда. Абсолютная интенсивность исчисля…
❤15custom 52515946046077242401
Часто спрашивают, что за лестницы повторений и для чего они? Почему бы не выполнять традиционные классические подходы? Вы безусловно можете так поступать и все равно будете получать довольно хорошие результаты, Лестницы - лишь один из дополнительных вариантов оптимизации нагрузки, который я использую. Не претендую на методическую истинность, однако, скорее всего вы здесь, потому что видели результаты людей, с которы…
❤12custom 52515946046077242401
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @doniwq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Продолжаем делать контент?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doni” (@doniwq), 12,095 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doniwq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.