10 measurements spanning 33 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,678–8,737 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 10:38
8,685
-12
3 Sept 2026, 04:39
8,697
-12
31 Aug 2026, 06:34
8,709
-7
28 Aug 2026, 04:18
8,716
-4
25 Aug 2026, 11:23
8,720
+1
19 Aug 2026, 02:34
8,719
-6
12 Aug 2026, 03:44
8,725
-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
8,729
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:01
8,730
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:20
8,730
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 8,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
23 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
32,726
Reactions total
496
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
727 reactions across 23 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
500
68.8%
🔥
60
8.25%
👍
49
6.74%
❤🔥
33
4.54%
🥰
24
3.30%
🙏
22
3.03%
👏
10
1.38%
⚡
7
0.963%
💘
7
0.963%
👎
6
0.825%
😍
3
0.413%
🤨
3
0.413%
😁
1
0.138%
😡
1
0.138%
🤔
1
0.138%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хвилини на роздуми і п’ять людських доль, які залежать від одного рішення. Коли ресурсів бракує, лікарі змушені обирати.
Військовому, який тримає фронт?
Маленькій дитині?
Породіллі у важких пологах?
Дівчині, якій просто зараз роблять операцію на серці?
Чи постраждалому в автотрощі?
Однак правильного рішення немає. В умовах критичного дефіциту будь-яке рішення лікаря — надважке. Саме тому донорів завжди має бути біл…
Жарти жартами, але що про ці профайли думає доказова медицина? 🥸
Сучасна наука чітко розділяє реальні біомаркери та популярні міфи. Група крові дійсно визначає особливості нашого імунітету, базову стійкість до стресу, ризик утворення тромбів та навіть інтерес до нас із боку комарів. Це генетичний паспорт, який допомагає лікарям прогнозувати вразливість організму до певних інфекцій чи серцево-судинних захворювань.
П…
Мабуть, найкраще в донорстві крові — це відчуття, що ти ділишся життям із людиною, якої навіть не знаєш. Ви можете ніколи не зустрітися на вулиці, мати абсолютно різні професії та погляди, але в один момент стаєте найближчими людьми у світі.
Коли ви реєструєтеся на донацію і здаєте кров — то вписуєте себе в чиєсь майбутнє. Десь у лікарняній палаті людина бореться за життя, навіть не здогадуючись, що прямо зараз хтос…
Хей, забігай здавати кров по дорозі на вересневу прогулянку ❤️
На тебе чекають професійна команда медиків, затишок та легендарні смаколики від Тітка Клара.
Все для того, щоб ця субота пройшла спокійно, корисно і з турботою — про себе та інших.
Додавай в календар:
🗓️ 5 вересня, субота
⏰ 10:00–14:00
📍Київ, FRACTAL HUB
Як долучитися?
☝️ Перш ніж зареєструватися, перевір себе на тимчасові та абсолютні протипоказання…
Гортайте карусель, шукайте свій літературний метч та пам'ятайте: ділитися кров'ю так само важливо, як і ділитися хорошими книгами ❤️
Улюблені книги вже є в застосунку Librarius, а календар донацій — на сайті donor.ua. Надихайтеся, відпочивайте та ставайте донорами чиєїсь нової сторінки у житті!
Дякуємо, ви топ! 🫶 Усі інсайти про підготовку, протипоказання та мапу центрів крові зібрані на donor.ua. Тисніть на посилання, реєструйтеся та підтримуйте донорський рух ❤️
Привіт! Як ви? 👀
Давайте швиденько перевіримо, наскільки добре ви знаєте донорство крові та чи не ведетеся на популярні міфи. Ми підготували кілька простих питань про підготовку, саму донацію та відновлення після неї.
Тицяйте нижче 👇
🔥16❤11❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @donorua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Як думаєте, скільки часу займає сама донація крові?
5–12 хв55%
15–20 хв35%
40 хв8%
понад годину2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
ДонорUA(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Ukraine}}
* Канал [https://t.me/donorua ДонорUA] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220422083657/https://t.me/donorua |date=22 квітня 2022…” read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДонорUA” (@donorua), 8,685 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/donorua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.