Channel
@dorineribk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003703291890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dorineribk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 24 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dorineribk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 49 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 52 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 51 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 47 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 44 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 44 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
120 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 37.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 21.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 20.0% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 9.17% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 5.00% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! когда продолжение работы по пвджастам я уже умираю от ожидания ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа. Вообще я планировала написать главу до конца августа, так как идей помимо дворянской ау очень-очень много, а времени и возможностей не настолько 😭
❤🔥4
Расчёска Секби/Джаст Hurt/comfort Ещё вчера вечером ящер отговаривал себя брать телефон в руки, ведь тогда он непременно бы сорвался и позвонил бывшему возлюбленному, только чтобы услышать его. Секби представлял, будто Джаст сообщает ему, что скучает и тоже не может жить без своего партнёра, а ящер расплывается в улыбке, пока в глазах стоят слёзы, и шепчет, что любит его. Но этого не произошло. Телеграф Фикбук #…
❤🔥5🍓2💘2
Дори нерыбк pinned «http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=us_p8slc4 Доброго дня, мне очень интересно знать, что думают читатели о моих работах 🥹 Если есть какие-то недопонимания, вопросы или просто что-то, что мне, как автору, будет интересно узнать, то я буду рада прочесть и ответить.…»
http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=us_p8slc4 Доброго дня, мне очень интересно знать, что думают читатели о моих работах 🥹 Если есть какие-то недопонимания, вопросы или просто что-то, что мне, как автору, будет интересно узнать, то я буду рада прочесть и ответить. Можете писать в анон ⬆️ или комментарии под этим постом
#допинфаксцл Джаст тот самый тип людей, которые в компании всегда ведут себя тихо и неприметно, а наедине оказываются самыми приятными и комфортными собеседниками. В переходном возрасте Санчезу казалось, что собственные родители любят Джаста больше, чем его.
❤9🔥3
Шутки шутками, смех смехом, а веселье заканчивается, когда в метки на фб заходишь
🔥2🕊1
Чудесный арт от моей любимой Чиз
🕊1
Channel photo updated
#допинфаксцл Барси часто называл Сашу ласково не только формой имени, но и прозвищами. Санчезу это жутко нравилось, хотя вслух он об этом не признавался. Однажды Ясеневский решил в ответ между делом окликнуть Голда как "солнце". Тогда тот до конца встречи ходил с красными щеками и прокручивал в голове прозвище.
❤7❤🔥4🔥2🍓1🥰1
Чего хотят подписчики
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Поклянешься в верности? Нсфв! Джаст/Секби Секби медленно обернулся, пытаясь найти корону. Увидев её, с золотистым блеском от отражающихся огоньков свечей, он смутился, ведь головной убор сразу напомнил ему о его титуле. Как же так, император, который управляет целой страной, в собственном кабинете позволил советнику разложить себя на рабочем столе? Телеграф Фикбук #джастби #зарисовка
❤🔥13
кстати говоря о ксцл, я сделала маленький плейлист в я.музыке(возможно будет пополняться!) 😎 предупреждаю, он не обговорен с дори(писателем), так что это лишь мои вайбы, не воспринимайте их как спойлер или посхалку, просто мои ассоциации 🤩плейлист
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dorineribk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чего хотят подписчики
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дори нерыбк” (@dorineribk), 49 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dorineribk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.