Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دشمن شکن

Channel

دشمن شکن

@doshmanshekan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

955subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139514287
TypeChannel
Username@doshmanshekan
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doshmanshekan

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9489589536 August 2026 — 954 subscribers6 August 2026 — 954 subscribers7 August 2026 — 955 subscribers15 August 2026 — 954 subscribers22 August 2026 — 948 subscribers30 August 2026 — 958 subscribers7 September 2026 — 952 subscribers15 September 2026 — 955 subscribers9556 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 40 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 947–960 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:20955+3
7 Sept 2026, 04:40952-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:27958+10
22 Aug 2026, 18:17948-6
15 Aug 2026, 07:24954-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:05955+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:02954no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:52954first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7740.1%
💩4121.4%
😁168.33%
👏105.21%
👍84.17%
👌73.65%
💯73.65%
🤝63.13%
🤬52.60%
❤42.08%
🔥42.08%
🏆21.04%
🤡21.04%
💘10.521%
🤩10.521%
🤯10.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTCviews —

دشمن شکن pinned «⏳ امشب إن شاءالله سندی درباره کتلت خامنه ای🔥 از قاعده ی الزام میفرستم که تاکنون ندیده اید‼️ منتظر باشید»

6 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC53 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⏳ امشب إن شاءالله سندی درباره کتلت خامنه ای🔥 از قاعده ی الزام میفرستم که تاکنون ندیده اید‼️ منتظر باشید

🤝4👍1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC64 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

وقتی شخصی منکوح⭕️🐖 باشه فقط اینگونه بی حیا است😂 حدیث هم که فرموده حیا و ایمان قرین یکدیگر هستند و اگر آن یکی نباشد دیگری نیز وجود ندارد✅ 👈🏾پس چون طرف🐷🥔 حیا نداره عدم ایمانش هم ثابت میشه !!! پس این داروین🔥زاده کافر هم هست(چه شود؟😂🤣) قبلا هم در اینجا اقرار به کفر🔥 کرده بود😡 🚨قبلا در اینجا به صورت کامل چنین حماقت🤡 و بیسوادی رو پاسخ فرو رونده در سلقلقیه🩸🐖گانش😝 داده بودیم و دشمن شکن⚔ پر است از رد جاذبه ی خیالی و کافی اس…

💯2😁2🏆1👌1

5 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC146 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

بالاخره چگونگی سیر تکاملی شیعه نما رو پیدا کردم 🎥 بچه ی خودشه دوس داشته برینه💩 بهش😂😂😂 ⏰ فقط ثانیه ی آخر کلیپ که تکاملش کامل و تبدیل به شیعه نما میشه😁😂🤣😝😆

🤣10

5 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC162 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

نتانیاهو: امروز شنیدم وحیدی فرمانده سپاه گفته ما برنامه هسته ای مون رو ادامه میدیم! باشه مشکلی نیست؛ پس منم همون کارای قبلی که‌ باهاتون کردم رو ادامه میدم! چطوره؟!

😁6👍2

5 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC181 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

شغالم اینجوری مرغ نمیگیره😂😂  🎥 مادر شیعه نما اینجوری شیعه نما رو بزرگ کرده که دشمن دین شده😁

🤣5💯1🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC182 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ببین بدبخت‌های خرزشی به چه روزی افتادند که وضیعت نیابتی‌هاشون براشون شده خوشبختی !!!

💩15

5 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC189 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎥فیلم ویژه از دوریین بدن سگ‌های نظامی: نیروهای دفاعی اسرائیل یک مسیر زیرزمینی حاوی ده‌ها موشک متعلق به سازمان‌های تروریستی فعال در غزه را شناسایی و منهدم کردند.

👍4👏2❤1

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC248 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

مقواپارتی بسیجیا ادامه داره 🤣 محل سلفی با سید مجقوا🤣

🤣8💩4🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC197 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🧩رژه تیم رهبری، نسخه‌ی مقوایی - وقتی اصل نباشه، مقوا هم غنیمته😁 اینم اثبات کره🌎🤥ی زمین توسط شیعه نمایان🤡 با مقوا😝

🤣10👍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC195 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

برق را براى شما مجانى مى كنيم ، مهندس ديوو💡

🤣10❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doshmanshekan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مرکز طب اسلامی آیت الله تبریزیان
@daroo100 · 20,973
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دشمن شکن” (@doshmanshekan), 955 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doshmanshekan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.