Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dotcoin

Bot

Dotcoin

@dotcoin_bot

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

39,801monthly users

+8,330 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID6549042457
TypeBot
Username@dotcoin_bot
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dotcoin_bot

Growth

31,47139,80135,6365 August 2026 — 31,471 monthly users7 August 2026 — 31,660 monthly users9 August 2026 — 31,868 monthly users11 August 2026 — 31,791 monthly users12 August 2026 — 32,302 monthly users13 August 2026 — 33,728 monthly users13 August 2026 — 33,728 monthly users16 August 2026 — 36,902 monthly users19 August 2026 — 38,602 monthly users22 August 2026 — 39,801 monthly users5 August 202622 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 16 days, net +8,330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,222–41,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
22 Aug 2026, 05:4739,801+1,199
19 Aug 2026, 18:4538,602+1,700
16 Aug 2026, 06:4636,902+3,174
13 Aug 2026, 19:3333,728no change
13 Aug 2026, 06:3533,728+1,426
12 Aug 2026, 04:5832,302+511
11 Aug 2026, 07:5231,791-77
9 Aug 2026, 09:1231,868+208
7 Aug 2026, 09:0431,660+189
5 Aug 2026, 22:0631,471first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 945 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dotcoin” (@dotcoin_bot), 39,801 monthly users as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dotcoin_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.