Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DoubleFaultMen

Channel

DoubleFaultMen

@doubleFaultMen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,731subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010816925
TypeChannel
Username@doubleFaultMen
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doubleFaultMen

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6751,7311,7037 August 2026 — 1,675 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,675 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,676 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,680 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,724 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,729 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,727 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,724 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,731 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,667–1,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 02:171,731+7
11 Sept 2026, 21:171,724-3
7 Sept 2026, 14:211,727-2
30 Aug 2026, 04:441,729+5
26 Aug 2026, 20:031,724+24
23 Aug 2026, 12:051,700+20
19 Aug 2026, 17:421,680-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:151,682+6
10 Aug 2026, 14:081,676+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:181,675no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:411,675first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,063 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁33331.3%
33231.2%
😭938.75%
🤣656.11%
custom 5238108896924549220484.52%
💔333.10%
🤯333.10%
👍211.98%
🙏181.69%
💅151.41%
🤮141.32%
🤡131.22%
🐳111.03%
💘111.03%
💯80.753%
💩70.659%
🏆40.376%
💊20.188%
🔥20.188%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC529 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹 Под этим постом можете в очередной раз написать, что я не по делу критикую де Минора и никакой он не хлебный мякиш. Ладно, уже не привыкать к таким перформансам австралийца. А ничего, тот факт, что у нас в 1/8 Мастерса сыграет максимум один игрок топ-10 (Шелтон), а то и все ноль? Это как вообще? Ok, трое в лазарете, один в предпенсионном возрасте и играет только Шлемы, но что с остальными? Шестая ракетка мира сей

😁248💯8custom 52381088969245492202

6 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC646 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤓 Пока наша с вами любимая игра переживает не лучшие времена, необходимо восполнять нехватку тенниса. С этим поможет проект «Лига Ставок Теннисный Клуб». Здесь на одном корте звезды играют в парах с профессиональными теннисистами в формате 2х2. Это не выставочные матчи ради галочки, а реальная борьба с живой атмосферой и выступлением звёзд. Тот редкий случай, когда теннис становится ближе и интереснее для широкой ау

🤮128💩4🤡3👍1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC864 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😱 Если жизнь даёт тебе «Мастерс» без Алькараса, Джоковича и Синнера, проиграй Грикспору на старте турнира с 1:0 по сетам.

😁73🤣219custom 52381088969245492203💔1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC839 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍦 Ничто не могло сейчас заставить меня в столь поздний час смотреть теннис, кроме матча Андрея. Думал, гляну первый сет и на плюс морали уйду на боковую, но нет. Завис на три часа попутно зарунив настроение. Просто мрак. Абсолютно мёртвый Андрей. Это вам говорю я, человек, который при любой маломальской возможности хвалит Рублёва. Первые два сета ни подачи, ни приёма, ни-че-го. После каждой ошибки стоял потухший и

😭54💔226

2 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,020 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😞 Пока мужской теннис в нокдауне и интерес к матчам нулевой, самое время покумекать о WTA. У Игоря тут недавеча вышел опрос «Самая красивая теннисистка?», и я решил накидать свой рейтинг. Вот такой топ-8 получился: 1. Эмма Радукану 2. Елена Рыбакина 3. Полина Кудерметова 4. Александра Эала 5. Анна Калинская 6. Ива Йович 7. Донна Векич 8. Аманда Анисимова Сразу оговорюсь, что это список теннисисток, которые мне импо

27💘6😁3custom 52381088969245492203💊2

30 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,200 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Надеюсь, что это как-то поможет в восстановлении запястья, иначе хэйркат «Анапа 2007» не имеет смысла.

😁57💅15🤣74🤡2

29 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,170 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока Синнер собирает Шлемы, а Санёчек в очередной раз вылетает где-то на грунтовой водокачке, нашёл в тг мини-апп, где можно спокойно затариться экипировкой. + Сейчас среди подписчиков отдают банку мячей Вилсон, прям с Ролан Горосса! RondeTennis — тенниска, обувь, ракетки, аксессуары. Ассортимент европейских магазинов, к заказу кладут сертификат подлинности с подписью от руки и бережно доставляют до дома! Плюс у ни

14👍5🤯1🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,120 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥺 Посмотрел, встал из-за стола, подошёл к окну, закурил.. Много думал.. Плакал..

😭38custom 52381088969245492206🤣5👍1

27 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC984 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😂 Насколько же стух тур, что я, как ребёнок, радуюсь возвращению Музетти, а камбэк Дрейпера вообще ощущается как манна небесная. Про спасение тенниса Хольгером и говорить нет смысла - это аксиома.

😁3510🙏7👍2

25 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,140 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌐 Кратко и по делу.

😁14custom 52381088969245492207

25 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,140 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😡 Потихоньку выходим из теннисного отпуска. Уж простите, но на просмотр гениальных грунтовых водокачек между травой и американским хардом меня не хватило. Сегодня Санечек выдал ужасный матч и не защитил титул в Кицбюэле. Идиотский укороченный на матчболе идеально описывает всю встречу. Итоговый слив 4:6, (6)6:7 - по делу. Алис же сыграл круто, шикарно подавал и играл первым номером. Теперь со спокойной душой может

24custom 523810889692454922010🐳6😁2

12 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,580 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Без экшена. До тай-брейка второго сета и правда верил во второй Шлем для Санёчка. Янник даже не в оптимальной форме над туром - всё по делу, кроме информного Кецмановича, никто в текущих реалиях не способен сломить Синнера. Как-то совсем не зашёл этот Уимблдон, Гаррос был намного интереснее. Наверное, это связано с тем, что большую часть времени я следил за чемпионатом мира, а не за теннисом. Поставил бы 6/10 турн

43💔10custom 52381088969245492209🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @doubleFaultMen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz459 voters

Чемп Уима 2026?

  1. Зверев41%
  2. Синнер59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

БОЛЬШЕ!
@tennis_bolshe · 60,661
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
ВВ ТЕННИС
@betboomtennis · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DoubleFaultMen” (@doubleFaultMen), 1,731 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doubleFaultMen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.