Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 横滨

Channel

横滨

@drIInng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

435subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001695706104
TypeChannel
Username@drIInng
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drIInng

Growth

4354514437 August 2026 — 451 subscribers8 August 2026 — 451 subscribers15 August 2026 — 446 subscribers22 August 2026 — 442 subscribers30 August 2026 — 435 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 433–453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:38435-7
22 Aug 2026, 12:25442-4
15 Aug 2026, 19:54446-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:01451no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:39451first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52291581721947840938382.2%
custom 52290489855361834071817.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2024 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 22:18 UTC257 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

с новым годом, дорогие мои и те, кто еще остался, и что так же важны. 🙏❤️

custom 522915817219478409310

30 Dec 2025, 16:31 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

очень нужна ваша помощь. буду благодарен если отзоветесь. 🥺

custom 52291581721947840934

30 Dec 2025, 16:31 UTC261 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

с новым годом. на канале еще остались люди, что ведут эстеты?

custom 52291581721947840935

28 May 2025, 17:14 UTC922 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52291581721947840936

7 Jan 2025, 03:03 UTC≈2,110 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ты - как свет далёкой звезды: хотя находишься далеко, всегда как-то оказываешься рядом с сердцем.

custom 522915817219478409335

3 Sept 2024, 15:59 UTC≈4,250 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я не ощущаю себя дома теперь вообще нигде.

custom 522915817219478409313

13 Aug 2024, 23:27 UTC≈4,500 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

этой ночью звёзды вновь подсказали мне, что я безумно по тебе тоскую.

custom 522904898553618340718

1 Jul 2024, 00:28 UTC≈6,080 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у каждого должно быть три причины чтобы жить. мои три причины — дождь, звезды и ты.

custom 52291581721947840933

23 May 2024, 18:49 UTC≈6,360 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ни одна рана на твоем теле не была сделала твоим врагом.

custom 52291581721947840931

29 Apr 2024, 18:03 UTC≈5,290 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ничто не делает нас более молчаливым, чем разочарование.

custom 52291581721947840934

17 Apr 2024, 07:11 UTC≈4,990 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

люди тратят слишком много времени чтоб найти правильного человека, вместо того чтобы стать этим человеком для самого себя.

custom 52291581721947840931

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @drIInng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 902,332 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“横滨” (@drIInng), 435 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drIInng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.