Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Шурупова👩‍⚕️ 🥗➕💊 Комплексный подход

Channel

Доктор Шурупова👩‍⚕️ 🥗➕💊 Комплексный подход

@drShurupova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,048subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001676304535
TypeChannel
Username@drShurupova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drShurupova

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0451,0531,0497 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,050 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,049 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,047 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,045 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,048 subscribers1,0487 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,044–1,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:561,048+3
15 Sept 2026, 08:371,045-2
12 Sept 2026, 04:001,047-2
3 Sept 2026, 09:361,049-3
30 Aug 2026, 22:541,052-1
28 Aug 2026, 06:171,053+1
22 Aug 2026, 02:271,052+3
18 Aug 2026, 22:491,049-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:361,050+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:411,048-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:031,049no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:581,049first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

235 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14059.6%
👍6427.2%
🥰125.11%
🔥104.26%
🙏83.40%
🤔10.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drShurupova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC117 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему к вечеру вздувается живот? Утром живот плоский, а к вечеру кажется, будто вы стали на несколько месяцев «беременнее»? Знакомая ситуация. За день мы принимаем пищу, пьём напитки, разговариваем во время еды, а иногда едим на бегу. Всё это приводит к накоплению содержимого в кишечнике и небольшого количества газов. Это абсолютно физиологический процесс. Поэтому небольшой объем живота вечером — вариант нормы. Но…

👍10❤4

9 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC183 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Меня продуло» 🌬 Эту фразу я часто слышу летом не только от пациентов. «Не сиди под кондиционером!» «Закрой окно, сквозняк!» Но давайте разберемся. Можно ли от сквозняка заболеть простудой? ОРВИ, грипп, COVID — это инфекционные заболевания. Их вызывают вирусы🦠, а не ветер, кондиционер или открытое окно в машине. Если рядом нет вируса, никакой сквозняк не сможет вызвать инфекцию. Тогда почему многие уверены, что…

❤12🔥2🤔1🥰1

3 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC215 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Если не есть суп каждый день — заработаешь гастрит». Это один из самых живучих мифов о питании. Сколько раз в детстве вы слышали: — «Нужно кушать супы!» — «Без первого желудок испортишь!» — «Сухомятка до добра не доведет!» И многие до сих пор искренне считают, что без жидкой еды нельзя. Почему тогда ни в одной международной рекомендации по здоровому питанию нет требования есть супы? Миф №1. Суп полезен для желуд…

❤11👍7

18 Jun 2026, 11:15 UTC266 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Омега-3 индекс: зачем его знать и нужно ли пить омегу? Сегодня все слышали про пользу омега-3, но далеко не каждый знает, хватает ли этих жирных кислот именно ему. Для этого существует анализ на Омега-3 индекс. Что это такое? Омега-3 индекс показывает содержание двух важнейших омега-3 жирных кислот (EPA и DHA) в мембранах эритроцитов. Этот показатель отражает не то, что вы съели вчера, а ваш уровень обеспеченности…

❤10👍5🙏2

15 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC239 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Горький вкус: почему не стоит его избегать? Большинство из нас любит сладкое, солёное или что-нибудь с ярким вкусом. А вот горькие продукты часто остаются без внимания. Но именно горечь может быть полезной частью здорового рациона. Когда мы чувствуем горький вкус, организм получает сигнал готовиться к перевариванию пищи. Активнее вырабатываются пищеварительные соки и желчь, что помогает процессу пищеварения. Кроме…

👍11❤6🔥3

10 Jun 2026, 09:47 UTC285 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На меня написали жалобу Рассказываю, как было дело. На прием пришла мама с ребенком 4 лет с жалобами на кашель. Заболевание началось с насморка, затем присоединился кашель. До меня они уже были у ЛОР-врача и получали лечение. В кабинете ребенок кашлянул всего один раз — кашель был влажным. При осмотре я увидела густую слизь, стекающую по задней стенке глотки, и обратила на это внимание мамы. Такая ситуация очень ч…

❤17👍5

6 Jun 2026, 06:59 UTC340 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Даже тренировки не спасают: что сидячая работа делает с вашим здоровьем Я провела опрос в канале и большинство из вас ответили, что проводят сидя 8–10 часов в день и встают только по необходимости. И это неудивительно: работа за компьютером, телефон, автомобиль, домашние дела — современная жизнь буквально "привязывает" нас к стулу🪑 Но проблема в том, что наш организм не был создан для такого образа жизни. Кто-то …

❤12

3 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC225 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой главный риск сидячего образа вы бы назвали? 🤔

  1. Боль в спине и шее68%
  2. Лишний вес43%
  3. Болезни сердца и сосудов51%
  4. Не вижу особых рисков0%

The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC245 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Сколько времени в среднем вы проводите сидя в течение дня?

  1. Менее 4 часов19%
  2. 4–6 часов16%
  3. 6–8 часов19%
  4. 8–10 часов38%
  5. Более 10 часов8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2026, 10:31 UTC327 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Качество яйцеклеток напрямую зависит от митохондрий Когда мы говорим про женское здоровье, фертильность и возможность забеременеть, чаще всего обсуждают гормоны, овуляцию, витамины или возраст. Но есть еще один очень важный фактор, о котором знают не все — митохондрии. И именно они обеспечивают яйцеклетку энергией, необходимой для: — созревания — деления клеток — оплодотворения — правильного развития эмбриона Инт…

❤14

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drShurupova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Какой главный риск сидячего образа вы бы назвали? 🤔

  1. Боль в спине и шее68%
  2. Лишний вес43%
  3. Болезни сердца и сосудов51%
  4. Не вижу особых рисков0%

The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Сколько времени в среднем вы проводите сидя в течение дня?

  1. Менее 4 часов19%
  2. 4–6 часов16%
  3. 6–8 часов19%
  4. 8–10 часов38%
  5. Более 10 часов8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr.Anshina
@DrAnshina · 398,031
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Шурупова👩‍⚕️ 🥗➕💊 Комплексный подход” (@drShurupova), 1,048 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drShurupova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.