Channel
@dr_aalizare
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002987403501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_aalizare |
| Description | دکتر علی زارع رتبه ۳۸۸ کنکور تجربی با ۱۰ سال سابقه ی مشاوره ی تحصیلی ،انتخاب رشته ،مشاوره کنکور ❌سخت گیرم ولی به فکرتم❌ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_aalizare |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 70 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 September 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 645 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تفاوت گزینش و ارزیابی تکمیلی ⛔️ گزینش برای بررسی داوطلب از لحاظ سیاسی، اخلاقی و امنیتی است و در واقع مرحله ای است برای تایید داطلب به عنوان شخصی که صلاحیت اخلاقی و اعتقادی رو برای معلم شدن داره و از ۱۰۰ نمره است ✔️ اما تفاوتی نداره داوطلب نمره ۶۰ بگیره یا ۱۰۰ چون در هر دو حال قبولی داره 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ارزیابی تکمیلی اما بخشی است برای بررسی صلاحیت علمی داوطلب برای معلم شدن شرایطی که با ابزار مصاحبه و بخ…
📚 درس هر روز، همان روز! یک اشتباه رایج اینه که آموزش رو میبینیم وفکر میکنیم مطلب رو فهمیدیم، مرورش رو میذاریم برای چند روز بعد! اما فهمیدن با یادگیری و تثبیت شدن فرق داره. 👀 فرقی هم نمیکنه آموزش رو از کجا گرفته باشی: مدرسه 🎥 کلاس آفلاین یا ویدیوی آموزشی ✨وقتی درس تازه تموم شده، مطالب، مثالها و نکتههای دبیر هنوز توی ذهنت تازهان؛ پس بهترین زمانه که یک مرور کوتاه و فعال داشته باشی. 🔹 جزوه رو مرور کن. 🔹 نکات …
📚 فقط زیاد درس خوندن، به معنی خوب درس خوندن نیست! گاهی یک دانشآموز ۵ ساعت مطالعه میکنه، اما بخش زیادی از این زمان صرف دوبارهخوانی، حواسپرتی و مطالعهی غیرفعال شده. یک تست ساده: بعد از پایان یک مبحث، کتاب رو ببند و از خودت بپرس: 🔹 چی یاد گرفتم؟ 🔹 مهمترین نکتهاش چی بود؟ 🔹 اگر از این قسمت تست بیاد، چه چیزی ممکنه ازم بپرسن؟ اگه نتونی جواب بدی، هنوز جای کار داری. 👀 یادگیری واقعی زمانی خودش رو نشون میده که کتاب…
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
🧠 اگه موقع درس خوندن مدام حواست پرت میشه، اینو امتحان کن: هر بار ذهنت رفت سمت گوشی، فکر دیگه یا هر چیز غیرمرتبط، بهجای جنگیدن باهاش فقط متوجهش شو و برگرد به کاری که داشتی انجام میدادی. هدف تمرکز این نیست که هیچ فکر مزاحمی نداشته باشی؛ هدف اینه که هر بار حواست پرت شد، سریعتر برگردی. 🎯 تمرکز هم مثل یک مهارته؛ با تکرار بهتر میشه. 🩷 🆔 @Dr_aalizare
❤1
بچه هایی که اعتراض زدید تغییر نمره ها چطور بود ؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
☀️ صبح بخیر بچههای پرتلاش من 🩷 بعضی روزها فقط باید شروع کنی؛ حتی اگر حال و حوصلهات کامل نباشه. چون چیزی که در بلندمدت نتیجه میسازه، شدت یک روز نیست؛ تکرار روزهای معمولیه. 🌱 امروز فقط از خودت بپرس: «اگه قرار باشه امشب از عملکرد امروزم راضی باشم، امروز باید چه کاری رو حتماً انجام بدم؟» همون رو انجام بده. 🎯 صبح قشنگتون بخیر 🤍 بریم که امروز رو برای خودمون بسازیم. 🫶🏻 ____ @dr_aalizare
👍1
همهی خستگیها یک معنی ندارن… گاهی واقعاً نیاز داری استراحت کنی. اما گاهی فقط از یک مدل مطالعهی طولانی خسته شدی. اگر بعد از چند ساعت مطالعهی سنگین دیگه ذهنت جواب نمیده، لزومی نداره کل روز رو تعطیل کنی. 👀 میتونی نوع فعالیتت رو عوض کنی: از مطالعهی مفهومی برو سراغ تست، از تست برو سراغ تحلیل، از تحلیل برو سراغ مرور. گاهی چیزی که فکر میکنی «بیحوصلگی»ه، فقط نیاز مغز به تغییر نوع فعالیتشه. 🧠✨ هوشمند درس خوندن ی…
یه اشتباه رایج اینه که فکر کنیم تست فقط برای اینه که بفهمیم چند درصد زدیم! 👀 در حالی که تست، یه جور آینهی مطالعهی توئه. 🪞🧠 اگر تستی رو غلط زدی، قرار نیست فقط جواب درست رو حفظ کنی؛ باید بفهمی اشتباهت از کجا اومده: 🔹 مفهوم رو بلد نبودی؟ 🔹 بیدقتی کردی؟ 🔹 سؤال رو اشتباه خوندی؟ 🔹 بین دو گزینه شک کردی؟ 🔹 یا زمان کم آوردی؟ چون هرکدوم از اینا درمان متفاوتی دارن. پس از امروز فقط نپرس: «چند درصد زدم؟» بپرس: «این تست ا…
⏳ چرا بعضی روزها با اینکه وقت داری، شروع نمیکنی؟ گاهی مشکل «تنبلی» نیست؛ شروع کردن خودش یک کار ذهنی محسوب میشه، مخصوصاً وقتی کاری بزرگ و مبهم به نظر میاد. بهجای اینکه بگی: «امروز باید ۶ ساعت درس بخونم!» فقط بگو: «الان ۲۰ دقیقه فقط همین یک مبحث رو شروع میکنم.» ذهن با یک کار مشخص و محدود، مقاومت کمتری نشون میده. 🧠✨ قرار نیست اول انگیزه بیاد و بعد شروع کنی؛ خیلی وقتها شروع کردن، انگیزه رو به وجود میاره. 🤍 ____…
🧠 یه نکته مهم دربارهی درس خوندن: اگه بعد از چند ساعت مطالعه احساس میکنی «همهچی رو خوندم»، ولی وقتی کتاب رو میبندی نمیتونی مطالب رو توضیح بدی، احتمالاً بیشتر درگیر آشنایی با مطلب شدی تا یادگیری واقعی. امتحانش سادهست: 📖 کتاب رو ببند. ✏️ بدون نگاه کردن، هرچی یادت میاد بنویس یا برای خودت توضیح بده. هرجا گیر کردی، دقیقاً همونجاست که باید دوباره برگردی و یاد بگیری. کمتر دوبارهخوانی کن؛ بیشتر از حافظهات جواب بک…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dr_aalizare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بچه هایی که اعتراض زدید تغییر نمره ها چطور بود ؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 17 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گروه آموزشی دکتر زارع” (@dr_aalizare), 70 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_aalizare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.