Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Ibragimus Хирург / онколог/ косметолог

Channel

Dr. Ibragimus Хирург / онколог/ косметолог

@dr_ibragimus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

361subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002603733688
TypeChannel
Username@dr_ibragimus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 October 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_ibragimus

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

341368354.53 October 2026 — 341 subscribers3 October 2026 — 341 subscribers7 October 2026 — 359 subscribers14 October 2026 — 361 subscribers20 October 2026 — 368 subscribers28 October 2026 — 361 subscribers3613 October 202628 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 25 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 337–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 14:17361-7
20 Oct 2026, 17:27368+7
14 Oct 2026, 10:37361+2
7 Oct 2026, 20:17359+18
3 Oct 2026, 09:22341no change
3 Oct 2026, 08:47341first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.3%
avg views ÷ 361 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 2026 – 3 October 2026)
Views total944
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9546.8%
👍3115.3%
🔥3014.8%
🙏209.85%
🤔83.94%
🙊41.97%
😐31.48%
😱31.48%
❤‍🔥20.985%
👀20.985%
😢20.985%
⚡10.493%
💯10.493%
🫡10.493%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_ibragimus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 3 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2026, 03:44 UTC129 views4 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

Политика властей очень понятная , пытаясь скрыть особо опасную инфекцию под COVID-19… нам стоит лишь наблюдать и заботится о безопасности своего здоровья только самим. Берегите себя

🙏4

Signed Amir Ibragimov

3 Oct 2026, 02:58 UTC133 views14 reactionsread 3 October 2026

ЕЩЁ ОДНО ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ ПО СИТУАЦИИ Появилась новая информация о селекторном совещании Минздрава Иркутской области, которое прошло вчера. По словам моего источника, совещание проводила заместитель министра здравоохранения Иркутской области Галина Михайловна Синькова. О лёгочной чуме на селекторе официально не сообщали. Сам диагноз отдельно не обсуждался. Основной заявленной темой был сезонный подъём вирусных заболеваний.…

👍14

Signed Amir Ibragimov

3 Oct 2026, 02:31 UTC155 views21 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

ЧУМА В ИРКУТСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ. ЧТО ИЗВЕСТНО НА 3 ОКТЯБРЯ Вчера я писал, что власти официально не называли конкретный диагноз. За последние часы информации стало больше. Начнём с того, что подтверждено публично. В Иркутскую область прибыла руководитель Роспотребнадзора Анна Попова. Вместе с губернатором Игорем Кобзевым она провела экстренное заседание санитарно-противоэпидемической комиссии. Шелеховская районная больни…

❤8👍7🤔2😐2😢2

Signed Amir Ibragimov

2 Oct 2026, 12:17 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 3 October 2026

Пациентка погибла в Шелеховской ЦРБ

❤2😱2

Signed Amir Ibragimov

2 Oct 2026, 08:24 UTC360 views32 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

ЧУМА В ИРКУТСКЕ? БЕЗ ПАНИКИ. РАЗБИРАЕМ ФАКТЫ Сегодня по Иркутску расходится информация о случаях лёгочной чумы и погибших. Коротко и жёстко: официального подтверждения этим сообщениям пока нет. Что известно на момент публикации, 2 октября: - в Шелеховской районной больнице введены ограничения; - власти сообщили о подозрении на один случай особо опасной инфекции; - конкретный диагноз официально не назван; - контак…

🙏15❤12👍4😱1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

28 Sept 2026, 22:52 UTC219 views7 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

Очередная находка. Я это выкладываю чтоб могли найти во время. Онкология кожи очень доступна к раннему скринингу, все лишь посмотреть на кожу и все. Не нужно дорогих установок , специального оборудования и подготовок. Просто раздеться и посмотреть.

🙊4❤2🔥1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

28 Sept 2026, 04:26 UTC196 views5 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

«В МОЁМ ВОЗРАСТЕ УЖЕ ГУБЫ ДЕЛАТЬ?» Посмотрите на свои фотографии лет 15 назад. Возможно, губы были полнее, контур чётче, а помада лежала совсем иначе. С возрастом губы меняются. Может уменьшаться объём мягких тканей, кожа теряет упругость, красная кайма становится менее заметной. Верхняя губа выглядит тоньше, вокруг рта появляются мелкие складки. И здесь контурная пластика бывает очень кстати. При аккуратной корр…

❤5

Signed Amir Ibragimov

28 Sept 2026, 02:25 UTC177 views5 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

Иногда анамнез и слова пациента дают диагноз сразу с первого приема. Главное нужно правильно и системно спросить ВСЁ. Именно в данном случае диагноз ясен, ранее это место облучали, и излучения проходили кожу, следовательно вызывали мутации, которые привели к очередному онкологическому процессу. #клиническое_мышление@dr_ibragimus #раккожи #онкология #клиническое_мышление

❤5

Signed Amir Ibragimov

21 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC222 views7 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

ГАРДАСИЛ И ГАРДАСИЛ 9. В ЧЁМ РАЗНИЦА? Давайте по-человечески разберём. Гардасил защищает от четырёх типов ВПЧ: • 16 и 18 связаны с развитием онкологических заболеваний; • 6 и 11 вызывают большинство аногенитальных кондилом. Гардасил 9 защищает от тех же четырёх типов плюс ещё от пяти онкогенных: 31, 33, 45, 52 и 58. То есть смысл девятивалентной вакцины простой: более широкий охват. В России официально зарегис…

❤3🤔3🔥1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

19 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC189 views11 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

МОЖНО ЛИ ПРИВИТЬСЯ ОТ РАКА ГОРЛА? После прошлого поста многие удивились: ВПЧ может быть связан не только с раком шейки матки, но и с раком ротоглотки. И здесь возникает логичный вопрос: «А прививка вообще существует?» Да. И это одна из немногих вакцин, которую можно назвать вакциной против рака. Коротко и жёстко. Вакцина от ВПЧ снижает риск заражения типами вируса, которые могут привести к: • раку ротоглотки; …

❤9⚡1👍1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

17 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC182 views28 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

Можно ли получить рак горла из-за минета? Сначала ответьте сами: 🔥 Да 🤔 Нет 😳 Никогда об этом не думал А теперь нажмите на скрытый текст: Сам оральный секс рак не вызывает. Но во время него может передаваться ВПЧ — вирус, некоторые типы которого связаны с раком ротоглотки. Вот теперь по-человечески. ВПЧ — очень распространённая инфекция. Большинство людей встречаются с вирусом и даже не узнают об этом: иммунная систе…

🔥16❤5🤔3👍1💯1🫡1🙏1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

10 Sept 2026, 01:11 UTC215 views1 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

#портфолио@dr_ibragimus #портфолио #современнаямедицина #системныйподход #акне #доказательнаямедицина #косметология

👍1

Signed Amir Ibragimov

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dr_ibragimus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Ibragimus Хирург / онколог/ косметолог” (@dr_ibragimus), 361 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_ibragimus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.