Channel
@dr_kazantsev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,541subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001503554811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_kazantsev |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_kazantsev |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 1,541 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 1,542 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 1,541 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 1,543 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 1,545 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 1,541 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 1,542 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 1,544 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 1,549 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 1,548 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,548 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
553 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 264 | 47.7% | |
| 🔥 | 85 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 55 | 9.95% | |
| 😍 | 46 | 8.32% | |
| 🙏 | 43 | 7.78% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 2.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 2.53% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 2.35% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.904% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.723% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.181% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.181% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 553 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Поза «берёзки», подушка под тазом и полчаса лежания после полового контакта не повышают вероятность беременности. Часть семенной жидкости действительно вытекает наружу, и это нормально. Сперматозоиды, которые могут участвовать в оплодотворении, уже начинают двигаться через шейку матки. В фертильный период они способны достигать маточных труб примерно за 15 минут. Поэтому количество вытекшей жидкости не показывает, …
👍10❤4😁1
Меня зовут Владимир Казанцев. Я врач-репродуктолог, к.м.н. Уже 10 лет я занимаюсь лечением бесплодия, программами ЭКО и сохранением фертильности. Но если точнее описать мой подход — я не просто делаю ЭКО. Я помогаю понять, почему не наступает беременность и какой путь действительно нужен именно в вашей ситуации. За каждым анализом, протоколом и эмбрионом всегда стоит человек. Человек, которому может быть страшно,…
❤52🤗1😎1
Низкий АМГ часто вызывает тревогу у пациентов, но сам по себе этот показатель не всегда определяет возможность наступления беременности. На практике мы оцениваем не один анализ, а совокупность факторов: овариальный резерв, овуляцию, возраст, скрытые причины бесплодия.
👍9❤1
А вот когда генетическое тестирование эмбрионов НЕ нужно👇 — первая программа экстракорпорального оплодотворения у молодой пациентки без факторов риска — отсутствие репродуктивных неудач в анамнезе — назначение «на всякий случай» Важно: генетическое тестирование не улучшает эмбрион и не повышает его качество. Оно не влияет на биологический потенциал эмбриона, только помогает в его отборе. Ключевой принцип: если р…
❤9👍8
АМГ 1,49, 34 года Трубный фактор, внематочная беременность, выкидыш раннего срока 3 года бесплодия 7 ооцитов получено 5 эмбрионов криоконсервировано Беременность с первого переноса 🥰
❤32🔥25❤🔥6👍3
Гормональные контрацептивы не вызывают бесплодие. Во время приёма препарата овуляция может быть подавлена - именно так работает контрацептивный эффект. После отмены таблеток, кольца, импланта или внутриматочной системы способность к зачатию обычно восстанавливается быстро. Если беременность не наступает после отмены контрацепции, нужно искать реальную причину: возраст, нарушения овуляции, состояние маточных труб, п…
👍10🔥7❤6
Опишите вашу работу, чтобы она звучала незаконно 😜
🔥22🤣13😁8
Беременности пятницы Люблю такие дни: заряжаешься энергией побед и чувствуешь, что день прожит не зря ☺️
❤62👍13❤🔥5😁1
АМГ 0,077 нг/мл Спонтанная беременность 🤰 Без ЭКО Без стимуляции Самостоятельно! 😎
🙏43❤34🔥17🏆5👍2
Тимофей Его мама пришла ко мне в 46 лет после нескольких неудачных попыток ЭКО Мы обсудили различные варианты лечения и подготовки к беременности, и приступили к активным действиям И у нас получилось 🥰 *опубликовано с согласия родителей
😍46❤43🔥14🥰7❤🔥3
Почему не наступает беременность? • Эндокринные нарушения: Сбои в гормональной системе (щитовидная железа, гипофиз, яичники), которые приводят к ановуляции — отсутствию созревания и выхода яйцеклетки. • Трубный фактор: Частичная или полная непроходимость маточных труб. Возникает вследствие перенесенных инфекций, воспалительных процессов или хирургических вмешательств, блокируя путь для встречи сперматозоида и яйцекл…
❤21😁5👏4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dr_kazantsev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Репродуктолог Владимир Казанцев” (@dr_kazantsev), 1,541 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_kazantsev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.