Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Елена Суслова- о женском здоровье 👩🏼‍⚕️

Channel

Доктор Елена Суслова- о женском здоровье 👩🏼‍⚕️

@dr_suslova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,346subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523153996
TypeChannel
Username@dr_suslova
DescriptionВрач-гинеколог, кмн, докмед Стаж более 15 лет от интимных вопросов до сложных диагнозов Консультация👇 Онлайн - телеграм, ассистентка @enchante_Diana Очный приём - клиника Источник 317-78-78 Подробнее https://taplink.cc/dr_suslova
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_suslova

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3467,4287,3877 August 2026 — 7,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,385 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,388 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,404 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,417 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,424 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,427 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,428 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,423 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,419 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,414 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,405 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,402 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,390 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,388 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,386 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,377 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,379 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,376 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,366 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,369 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,362 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,351 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,353 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,346 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,334–7,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 17:107,346-7
4 Nov 2026, 23:167,353+2
1 Nov 2026, 14:307,351-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:167,362-7
26 Oct 2026, 12:547,369+3
23 Oct 2026, 09:457,366-10
20 Oct 2026, 12:457,376-3
17 Oct 2026, 14:417,379+2
14 Oct 2026, 18:207,377-9
11 Oct 2026, 00:577,386-2
4 Oct 2026, 23:557,388-2
25 Sept 2026, 13:577,390-12
16 Sept 2026, 23:577,402-3
12 Sept 2026, 23:567,405-9
9 Sept 2026, 08:547,414-5
4 Sept 2026, 04:157,419-4
31 Aug 2026, 13:537,423-5
28 Aug 2026, 04:337,428+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:547,427+3
21 Aug 2026, 16:257,424first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.47%
avg views ÷ 7,346 subscribers
Avg views / post
695
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held60 (16 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total18,080
Reactions total542
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
215
Videos
70
Links
323

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,020 reactions across 53 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤77075.5%
👍11211.0%
🔥353.43%
🎉302.94%
😁232.25%
❤‍🔥80.784%
👀70.686%
🤔60.588%
💯50.49%
🫡50.49%
💔40.392%
😱40.392%
🙈30.294%
🥰20.196%
🐳10.098%
💊10.098%
🗿10.098%
😭10.098%
🙏10.098%
🤯10.098%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,020 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (29.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC256 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

НИЗКИЙ ТЕСТОСТЕРОН У ЖЕНЩИНЫ. ПОРА НАЗНАЧАТЬ ГОРМОНЫ? «Доктор, у меня совсем нет желания. Сдала тестостерон — он низкий. Может, поэтому?» С таким вопросом женщины приходят всё чаще. И кажется, что решение очевидно: мало тестостерона — нужно добавить. Но не всё так просто. 🔹 Первое. У женщин нет установленного уровня тестостерона в крови, ниже которого обязательно снижается либидо. 🔹 Второе. Низкий показатель в …

❤10

6 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC416 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

ОРГАЗМ ВО ВРЕМЯ БЕРЕМЕННОСТИ МОЖЕТ ВЫЗВАТЬ ВЫКИДЫШ? А ещё малыш якобы всё чувствует, близость провоцирует преждевременные роды, а на поздних сроках интим вообще под запретом. Сколько же страхов вокруг обычной физиологии! На самом деле при нормально протекающей беременности близость и оргазм, как правило, безопасны. Но есть ситуации, когда ограничения действительно необходимы. 🎥 В новом видео разбираю: ▪️ Может л…

❤12👍1

6 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC424 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

ОРГАЗМ ОТ ЧИХАНИЯ, КОЛЕНКИ И ДАЖЕ ЧИСТКИ ЗУБОВ? 😳 Думаете, оргазм возможен только во время интимной близости или стимуляции гениталий? А вот и нет! В книге сексолога Г. Кочаряна описаны настолько необычные случаи, что некоторые способны удивить даже врачей. 8 самых неожиданных ситуаций, в которых люди испытывали оргазм. 1️⃣ ОРГАЗМ ОТ ПРИКОСНОВЕНИЯ К КОЛЕНУ У 30-летней женщины обнаружилась необычная эрогенная зон…

❤10

6 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC342 viewsread 8 November 2026

Пока вы думаете про беременность и секс, расскажу немного об оргазме👌

6 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC360 viewsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Как думаете, половая жизнь во время беременности безопасна?

  1. Да, однозначно2%
  2. Да, но могут быть ограничения82%
  3. Нет, нужно исключать в любом случае2%
  4. А зачем она нужна, если уже ты беременная1%
  5. Не знаю, но хочу узнать подробнее14%
  6. Не знаю и знать не хочу0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 20:23 UTCviews —

Доктор Елена Суслова- о женском здоровье 👩🏼‍⚕️ pinned a photo

3 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC569 views21 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

ЧТОБЫ МЫ НЕ ПОТЕРЯЛИСЬ Соцсети меняются Алгоритмы меняются Иногда вы просто перестаёте видеть тех, кого читали регулярно. Поэтому сохраняйте этот пост: здесь все мои официальные страницы Я — Елена Суслова, врач акушер-гинеколог, гинеколог-эндокринолог, специалист по женскому сексуальному здоровью, к.м.н. Где меня найти: Instagram — dr.suslova Telegram — dr_suslova YouTube — dr_suslova ВКонтакте — dr.suslova_healt…

❤21

2 Nov 2026, 19:51 UTC591 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

АНОРЕКСИЯ И БУЛИМИЯ: СЛУЧАЕВ СТАЛО НА 71% БОЛЬШЕ И это цифры нового исследования, опубликованного в JAMA Psychiatry. С 1990 по 2023 год число случаев нервной анорексии и булимии в мире выросло на 71%. В 2023 году с этими расстройствами жили около 18 миллионов человек. И прогноз — рост продолжится: к 2050 году их может быть уже почти 22 миллиона. Но есть ещё одна важная деталь. Булимию мы умеем лечить не только п…

❤7👍6💔4💯2

2 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC594 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Забирайте бесплатный гайд по ссылке👇 https://drsuslova.ru/y/f919eb7 И обязательно поделитесь с мамой, подругой, сестрой. Эта информация может помочь спасти жизнь

❤16

2 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC570 views0 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

А вы проводите самообследование молочной железы?

  1. Да, конечно26%
  2. Нет, не умею32%
  3. Делаю, но не уверена, что правильно35%
  4. Еще бы кто-то сказал, как это делать9%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC670 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Рак молочной железы — одно из самых распространенных онкологических заболеваний у женщин, но на ранней стадии он излечим в 95% случаев. Как не пропустить первые симптомы, кому грозит болезнь и что из этого — опасные мифы? Разбираем с позиции доказательной медицины. 📱Рассказала в новом видео на своем YOUTUBE канале 👇 https://youtu.be/zhaDF8hvp4s А также создала для вас бесплатный гайд по самообследованию молочной…

❤15

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @dr_suslova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dr_suslova edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

Как думаете, половая жизнь во время беременности безопасна?

  1. Да, однозначно2%
  2. Да, но могут быть ограничения82%
  3. Нет, нужно исключать в любом случае2%
  4. А зачем она нужна, если уже ты беременная1%
  5. Не знаю, но хочу узнать подробнее14%
  6. Не знаю и знать не хочу0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

А вы проводите самообследование молочной железы?

  1. Да, конечно26%
  2. Нет, не умею32%
  3. Делаю, но не уверена, что правильно35%
  4. Еще бы кто-то сказал, как это делать9%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

А вы готовы узнать правду о вакцинации?

  1. Да, конечно72%
  2. Нет, все итак известно4%
  3. Меня нечем удивить8%
  4. Не томите18%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Oct 2026, 20:16 UTCAnonymous Poll287 voters

Влагалище заросло, потому, что не было долго сексуальных отношений

  1. Это ложь53%
  2. Звучит очень сомнительно34%
  3. Я думаю, да, на то оно и названо влагалищем, чтобы что-то вмещать2%
  4. Впервые слышу10%
  5. Поподробнее пжл7%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

Бывает, что вы любите своего мужчину, но близости с ним совсем не хочется? Что из этого вам знакомо? Опрос анонимный. Можно выбрать несколько вариантов. 🤍

  1. К вечеру хочу только спать, на близость нет сил53%
  2. Избегаю прикосновений, чтобы партнёр не ждал продолжения24%
  3. Иногда соглашаюсь на секс, хотя самой не хочется39%
  4. Чувствую вину, когда снова отказываю28%
  5. Скучаю по себе прежней — когда желание появлялось само38%
  6. Хочу близости, но мешают сухость, боль или дискомфорт14%
  7. Меня всё устраивает, менять ничего не хочу15%

The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

Если может то как?

  1. По девственной плеве43%
  2. По форме влагалища15%
  3. По ощущениям4%
  4. По внутреннему убеждению2%
  5. Я голосовал(а), что не может22%
  6. А не проще ли спросить у девушки23%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MAMA_SINKA
@mama_sinka · 40,651
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Елена Суслова- о женском здоровье 👩🏼‍⚕️” (@dr_suslova), 7,346 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_suslova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.