Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Draconity Nikki

Channel

Draconity Nikki

@draconikki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

687subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002769479789
TypeChannel
Username@draconikki
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/draconikki

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6877217047 August 2026 — 721 subscribers7 August 2026 — 721 subscribers15 August 2026 — 714 subscribers24 August 2026 — 709 subscribers30 August 2026 — 701 subscribers8 September 2026 — 694 subscribers15 September 2026 — 687 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 682–726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:41687-7
8 Sept 2026, 03:16694-7
30 Aug 2026, 17:44701-8
24 Aug 2026, 05:26709-5
15 Aug 2026, 15:25714-7
7 Aug 2026, 12:23721no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:47721first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

213 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54407186104042419866831.9%
custom 54654715634930417165123.9%
custom 54675114968649869763315.5%
custom 54585828912167909712913.6%
custom 5467626224031397564188.45%
custom 5400125461445506169146.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 5 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @draconikki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC147 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

...Ивка отложила перо и взглянула на торопливо составленную записку: «Наставница, я чувствую, что не могу остаться. Не ищите меня и простите. 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥ваша ученица» Девушка оставила послание под одним из горшков с зельями, зная, что в нужный момент слова будут прочитаны. 🫥🫥До встречи... Я вернусь сильнее и мудрее, чтобы вы гордились мной. ___________ я приняла решение взять паузу в соцсетях на неопределённый срок.

custom 545858289121679097129custom 54001254614455061699custom 54675114968649869768

3 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC111 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BulkaInfinnityNikkiPhoto

Розыгрыш завершён ❤️ 🤩место - Splendid Gift Box I-VI (всё поэтапное пополнение)🐚✨✨ - получает @SharlotkaEx 🤩 место - Casket of Golden Light (х3 стелларитов)✨- получает @tutoriii 🤩 место - Grace and Rhythm Box (наряд Dawn's Melody с эволюцией + шарниры, крутки, ресурсы)📦✨✨ - получает @lorddpplgngr 🤩 место - Лот за 300 стеллы на ваш выбор⚡️ - получает @divanizmagnita 🤩 место - Наряд за 60 стеллы на ваш выбор💃 - получ

custom 546547156349304171611custom 54676262240313975646custom 54675114968649869764custom 54407186104042419863

31 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC375 views71 reactions20 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вᴇличᴀᴇм вᴀс, ᴀᴘχᴀнrᴇли, и ᴀнrᴇли и вся воинствᴀ, χᴇᴘʏвими и сᴇᴘᴀфими, слᴀвяպии rосподᴀ. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ образ, вдохновленный фреской Архангела Михаила

custom 546547156349304171636custom 544071861040424198619custom 546751149686498697614custom 54001254614455061692

29 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC294 views57 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🫥🤩рождённая из🤩 🫥🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🫥🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 вы вообще видели, что моя сестра творит??? 🫥пустила мелкую на аккаунт, а она 🫥лучше меня фотографии делает🤩 🫥

custom 544071861040424198637custom 546762622403139756410custom 54675114968649869767custom 54001254614455061693

28 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC106 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @photoguildPhoto

НОВЫЙ ПОДКАСТ - смотреть тут 🤩 Таня, Булка, Дана, Заварочка и Дракониха собрались обсудить все новые аутфиты патча 2.8. Поговорили про макияжи, декорации и даже про религиозные отсылки в нарядах! Если вам нравится контент, не забывайте ставить лайк или оставлять комментарий на ютубе! Так вы нам очень поможете продвинуть видео 🥰 Дисклеймеры: 🤩Видео несёт исключительно развлекательный характер. 🤩Вы можете быть не со

custom 54407186104042419869custom 54654715634930417164custom 54676262240313975642

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @draconikki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Draconity Nikki” (@draconikki), 687 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/draconikki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.