Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,089–10,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 14:16
10,197
+26
15 Sept 2026, 15:21
10,171
+41
13 Sept 2026, 22:58
10,130
+4
12 Sept 2026, 08:37
10,126
+12
10 Sept 2026, 02:55
10,114
+2
6 Sept 2026, 22:38
10,112
+2
2 Sept 2026, 20:49
10,110
+1
1 Sept 2026, 21:57
10,109
+4
31 Aug 2026, 18:34
10,105
-6
30 Aug 2026, 19:25
10,111
+7
29 Aug 2026, 15:56
10,104
-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:25
10,105
-6
27 Aug 2026, 19:05
10,111
+4
26 Aug 2026, 17:13
10,107
-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:58
10,108
-5
24 Aug 2026, 21:08
10,113
+1
23 Aug 2026, 04:19
10,112
-6
21 Aug 2026, 19:34
10,118
+3
20 Aug 2026, 19:45
10,115
-4
19 Aug 2026, 16:35
10,119
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 10,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,630
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
82 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
36,840
Reactions total
1,079
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 31m
Average length
8m 19s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,421 reactions across 82 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,842
28.7%
👍
1,253
19.5%
🔥
1,249
19.5%
😁
553
8.61%
💩
463
7.21%
🤡
243
3.78%
custom 5350381094388648790
166
2.59%
😍
157
2.45%
🤔
154
2.40%
🤯
128
1.99%
🫡
109
1.70%
👎
54
0.841%
🗿
26
0.405%
😢
15
0.234%
👌
7
0.109%
💯
1
0.016%
🤬
1
0.016%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 82 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dragtimes_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Купи Rumble Bee SRT и получи пикап с V10 в подарок
Ram придумали довольно убедительный способ собрать участников для благотворительного аукциона: *положить в комплект с новым 777-сильным пикапом ещё один пикап с V10.
Компания выставит на аукцион Barrett-Jackson в Лас-Вегасе первый экземпляр 2027 Ram 1500 Rumble Bee SRT. Сам автомобиль пойдёт в серию только в следующем году, зато покупатель получит ещё и Dodge Ram 1…
Первые шпионские фото Ferrari F80 XX
Ferrari, судя по всему, готовят F80 XX — хардкорную трековую версию F80. Первый прототип уже засветился на трассе Портимао в Португалии. Официального подтверждения названия пока нет, но Ferrari ещё в мае подали заявку на товарный знак.
Главная улика — огромнейшее фиксированное «лебединое» антикрыло, тогда как обычный F80 обходится активным спойлером. Плюс более агрессивные сплит…
Самые медленные Ferrari в истории
За 80 с лишним лет в Маранелло успели построить несколько автомобилей, которые не особенно сочетались с имиджем Ferrari.
Ferrari 208 GTB/GTS
В 1973 году Италия решила, что автомобили с двигателем больше 2 литров — роскошь, а значит, их владельцы должны платить соответствующе. В результате Ferrari 308 с её 2,9-литровым V8 внезапно подорожала на 38%.
В Маранелло решили не спорить с …
Lexus готовят RX, который хочет испортить жизнь BMW X5 M
Фотографы поймали прототип, который, судя по всему, станет Lexus RX Morizo RR. И если слухи не врут, японцы собираются превратить семейный кроссовер в шестисотсильную проблему для BMW X5 M и Mercedes-AMG GLE.
Снаружи пока всё ещё узнаётся RX, но под камуфляжем происходит что-то подозрительное. Кузов стал шире, появились расширенные арки, дополнительные воздух…
LEGO Technic Dodge Viper GTS-R
Dodge Viper GTS-R — это американский автомобиль, который пошёл в гонки на выносливость бороться с Porsche, Ferrari и прочими европейскими аристократами — и довольно успешно им испортил настроение.
GTS-R три года подряд выигрывал свой класс в Ле-Мане — в 1998, 1999 и 2000 годах, причём в эти же годы Viper часто занимал и второе место в классе. В 2000-м он вообще устроил американский ре…
BMW X5 M рядом с «младенцем» G-Class выглядит так, будто пришёл забирать его из детского сада
В Мюнхене поймали забавную парочку: прототипы будущего BMW X5 M и компактного Mercedes G-Class одновременно остановились на светофоре.
BMW выглядит огро-о-омным! Причём рядом с ним стоит не какой-нибудь крошечный городской кроссовер, а будущий «бэби-гелик», который так-то будет весьма приличного размера.
А вот X5, хоть и …
Camaro, который в 53 года выглядит лучше нас с вами
Этот Chevrolet Camaro RS 1973 года прожил 40 лет прежде, чем попал в руки тюнеров из D&Z Customs. В 2013 году его отреставрировали для выставки SEMA и соревнования OPTIMA Ultimate Street Car Invitational, после чего автомобиль успел засветиться в нескольких журналах. Теперь он отправляется на аукцион Mecum.
Под капотом находится 7,2-литровый V8 Wegner Automotive м…
Mercedes-AMG прокатились по Нюрбургрингу с ИИ
У человечества ушло больше века на то, чтобы научиться быстро ездить по Нюрбургрингу, и теперь Mercedes-AMG пошли на следующий этап. На Нордшляйфе заметили GT 63, который проходил трассу практически самостоятельно: водитель находился за рулём, но демонстративно не держал руки на руле.
Перед этим прототип несколько раз медленно проехал по трассе, собирая данные и букваль…
Швейцарец проехал 100 000 км на Pagani Huayra
Большинство владельцев Pagani Huayra используют свой автомобиль примерно одинаково: хранят в тёплом помещении, иногда снимают чехол и очень внимательно следят, чтобы рядом никто не дышал слишком громко.
Но один швейцарский владелец решил, что его Huayra — это не инвестиционный фонд с четырьмя колёсами, а один из самых невероятных автомобилей своего времени. И раз уж он …
Ferrari готовят 296 Challenge Stradale
В Маранелло решили, что 296 Speciale недостаточно специальная и неплохо бы выпустить ещё что-нибудь. Например, версию своего гибридного суперкара, но без гибрида. А что не так?
По слухам, дебют новинки ожидается в ноябре. Официального подтверждения пока нет, но тестовые прототипы уже показывают, что перед нами не просто 296 с новым бампером.
Итак, вместо гибридной силовой уст…
Lamborghini заявили, что не боятся китайских суперкаров
В Поднебесной выпускают электрички четырёхзначной мощности, которые разгоняются до сотни за какие-то неприличные доли секунды. Но глава Lamborghini Стефан Винкельманн заявил, что не считает китайские электрические суперкары угрозой для итальянской марки.
По его мнению, дело не только в мощности и динамике: покупатель суперкара выбирает не таблицу характеристик…
BMW объяснили, почему выкидывают кнопки из автомобилей: виновата молодёжь
Если вам кажется, что в новых BMW становится всё меньше нормальных кнопок, а всё больше огромных экранов, сенсорных поверхностей и голосовых команд, то можете не сердиться на производителя. Во всём виноваты люди младше 45 лет.
По крайней мере, именно так объясняет происходящее глава BMW Group Australia. По его словам, молодые водители привыкл…
💩55😁20❤7🤡7😢2custom 53503810943886487902
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @dragtimes_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Журнал Авто.ру online @autoruonline · 24,647 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
@alan_enileev @alan_enileev · 38,805 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
Илья KICKDOWN 🏁 @kickdown88 · 137,578 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
D3 | Davidich Dynamic Drive @eric_davidich_d3 · 426,662 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
WAY TO M TWO @kozlowwmov · 31,223 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Absurd_Drive @absurddrive · 33,591 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Winde @windemsk · 34,184 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Takayama Forward Auto / Drift Team @forwardauto_official · 22,748 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dragtimes - сообщество петролхедов!” (@dragtimes_ru), 10,197 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dragtimes_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.