Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДОК

Channel

ДОК

@drdomtube

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,018subscribers

-81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136926220
TypeChannel
Username@drdomtube
Created1 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drdomtube

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0185,0995,058.56 August 2026 — 5,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,099 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,098 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,094 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,085 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,077 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,076 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,064 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,035 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,031 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,021 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,023 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,018 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,006–5,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:405,018-5
13 Sept 2026, 06:395,023+2
9 Sept 2026, 17:565,021-10
4 Sept 2026, 15:225,031-4
1 Sept 2026, 03:055,035-18
29 Aug 2026, 03:585,053-11
25 Aug 2026, 19:035,064-12
22 Aug 2026, 13:485,076-1
19 Aug 2026, 14:055,077-8
16 Aug 2026, 15:225,085-9
13 Aug 2026, 01:245,094-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:025,097-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:465,098-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:335,099no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:495,099first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,222 reactions across 21 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁87327.1%
🤣52616.3%
custom 528308726332707603545914.2%
💯2066.39%
❤1394.31%
🌚1364.22%
custom 52630068953538969081314.07%
🤡1153.57%
custom 5400081970606656225902.79%
👍792.45%
custom 5350327733714952185742.30%
custom 5771573307153321169652.02%
🔥591.83%
🙈441.37%
🍾411.27%
🗿200.621%
custom 5334919100453890096190.59%
⚡180.559%
👏180.559%
🤯170.528%
17 further kinds932.89%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈2,070 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И МЫ ПОСМОТРЕЛИ 📺 YouTube: https://youtu.be/JIPcCb4HNzg 💰 Boosty: https://boosty.to/drdomtube 💬 Приватка https://t.me/+CRq1FpHehr4yYzNi

❤18🌚9👍5🍾1

5 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈2,650 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ну это прям хорошо ☺️ @

😁63🤡8🤣4🥴3👏2🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC≈4,890 views237 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Блеать, что это, ахахахаха Мы должны это посмотреть

😁147🤣60🗿11🤮10🌚5💊4

31 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC≈4,860 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Илон Маск отказался от встречи с Зеленским во время его визита в США Не, ну оно и понятно

😁119💯21🖕7🗿3🌚1👏1

29 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈8,490 views201 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@

custom 5263006895353896908131😁48💯15🤡5✍1❤1

29 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈4,390 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁56🍾40🤯17🔥5custom 53349191004538900964👀3

25 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈4,960 views228 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣163😁31custom 533491910045389009615custom 540008197060665622512🤡5🍓2

23 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC≈5,580 views192 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

НИКАКИХ БОЛЬШЕ ВЕЧЕРИНОК Высший административный суд Франции закрыл парижский гэнгбэнг-клуб. Почему? Потому что гэнгбэнг унижает «человеческое достоинство» женщины. Мнение самих участниц не учитывалось: за них всё объяснили три подтянутые к делу феминистические организации. Феминистки разъяснили, что, несмотря на добровольный характер и собственное желание участниц, женщин следует от подобного защитить: гэнгбэнг — …

😁110custom 577157330715332116965🤡9😱3custom 52808190137886538823🤬2

21 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC≈5,250 views241 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ребят, утверждение, что Шевцов относится скорее к микроорганизмам, — не более чем чья-то шутка. Используя эмблему автомобиля в качестве эталона, можно рассчитать, что его примерный рост составляет около 52 см, что позволяет уверенно отнести его к небольшим млекопитающим.

😁157custom 535032773371495218574🗿6🔥2🌚1🎅1

16 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC≈8,520 views191 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🌚86🙈44😁31💯24❤3😭3

16 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈72,700 views396 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сидят в Роскомнадзоре два чиновника, один другому: — Смотри, вон западный сервис работает. А давай заблокируем! Другой ему в ответ: — А если они наш заблокируют? Первый чиновник: — А наш-то за шо?

🤣299😁63⚡18custom 537767230872488946812❤2💔2

14 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC≈8,570 views209 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Европейский вещательный союз решил, что показывать спортсменок сзади, сбоку, в наклоне, на старте, да и вообще как угодно, если это может показаться кому-то привлекательным — нельзя. Сопроводительная иллюстрация демонстрирует, что под запретом стартовая поза бегуньи, вид уходящих спортсменок сзади, объятия и даже обычный наклон... Да-да, они просто видимо не нашли лучшего способа сказать "нельзя снимать задницу"…

custom 5283087263327076035107custom 540008197060665622578🤡10❤8😁4🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @drdomtube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зио
@zio402 · 44,865
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 91,213
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДОК” (@drdomtube), 5,018 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drdomtube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.