Channel
@dreamsorder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
775subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219462248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dreamsorder |
| Created | 23 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dreamsorder |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 775 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 778 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 776 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 779 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 776 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 776 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
106 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 45.3% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 17.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 11.3% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 10.4% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не люблю предельные величины (особенно после вчерашнего поста)! В 1960-е и с приходом Нового Голливуда много чего важного происходило, и тремя образами не ограничиться, но эти три — уж точно один из возможных путей переосмысления женских героинь. Ну и просто пронизительные Вудворд в «Рейчел, Рейчел» (1968), Лоден в «Ванде» (1970), Бёрстин в «Алиса здесь больше не живет» (1974). Как они там вообще, среди всего этого м…
❤6❤🔥1💯1
Вот книга. Не поняла, что с ней делать, унесу пока в подвал. (Или, как Джо с «Сиянием» — в морозилку!)
😁4
Взялась разгребать домашние залежи букинистических книг и открыла купленную года четыре назад Close-Ups, про голливудских звезд. Листаю, добираюсь до раздела с секс-символами, который венчает статья о Джоди Фостер, и у меня глаза на лоб лезут. Книга 1978 года, то есть Фостер на момент выхода книги 16 лет! Ничего хорошего не ожидая, открываю статью, читаю, дочитываю, откладываю книгу, бешусь. Разные бывают подходы к …
💔5
Один из тех моментов, когда начинаю закрывать вкладки после рабочей недели и не могу оторваться! «Кэрол» не отпускает. Лорен Бэколл (фото Рут Оркин) / Кейт Бланшетт в «Кэрол» Эстер Бабли (фотографиня) / Руни Мара в «Кэрол»
❤15
Сегодня обсуждали на семинаре «Кэрол», и я совсем забыла рассказать студентам еще и про любовь, а не только про ретро цветность и рождество ❤️🔥 (вторая парочка — бонусом)
❤11❤🔥11🔥5
Нолан! «Одиссея»! Уже! В эфире! Наш четвертый и заключительный выпуск из серии, посвященной фильмам, миру, методу Нолана. На родной платформе и в эппл-подкастах.
🔥13❤2
А у меня вопрос! Есть тут любители советского цветного кино? Расскажите, какие фильмы вам именно цветом запомнились? Годов с 1950-х и по 1970-е. Я сегодня посмотрела «Когда цветут розы» (1959) — и он очень круто решен по цвету, минималистично и со смыслом! На фильм совершенно случайно напала, может, что-то еще отыщется из неочевидного или очевидного, к чему я не присматривалась?!
❤9
Еле сегодня оторвала себя от постели. Такой день. Оставлю дневниковую запись, не свою, а Фаины Алексеевны Трахтенберг за 1 июня 1962: Паскуднейшее состояние и внешне, и внутренне. Ничего не радует. Даже великолепный фильм накануне «Великолепная семерка», все что надо — цветной, широкоэкранный, американский, ковбойский... Паскудно, паскудно и еще раз паскуднейше... (взято с сайта Прожито)
💯10❤5🕊4💔2🔥1😁1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @dreamsorder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Порядок снов” (@dreamsorder), 775 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dreamsorder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.