Channel
@drgilaki
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,452subscribers
+1,812 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001003455000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drgilaki |
| Created | 2 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drgilaki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “دکتر گیلکی(مهندسی ذهن)” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 28,452 | -32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 28,484 | +10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 28,474 | +142 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 28,332 | +65 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 28,267 | -27 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 28,294 | -33 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:18 | 28,327 | -23 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 28,350 | -34 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 28,384 | -42 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 28,426 | +58 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 28,368 | -217 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 01:54 | 28,585 | -184 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 28,769 | +392 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 28,377 | -26 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 28,403 | -113 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 28,516 | -57 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 28,573 | +230 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 28,343 | +1,074 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 27,269 | -70 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 27,339 | first reading |
573 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 221 of 222 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 573 (4 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 126,178 |
| Reactions total | 3,089 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 07:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,867 reactions across 566 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,907 | 77.9% | |
| 👍 | 1,215 | 13.7% | |
| 👏 | 356 | 4.01% | |
| 🔥 | 185 | 2.09% | |
| 😢 | 59 | 0.665% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 0.485% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 0.44% | |
| 😍 | 34 | 0.383% | |
| 💔 | 25 | 0.282% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.034% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.011% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 566 of the 573 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 573 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔸برای همفرکانس شدن با پول، فقط خواستن ثروت کافی نیست؛ باید روی باورها و احساساتت هم کار کنی✅ یکی از راهها اینه که هر روز چند دقیقه از جملات تأکیدی استفاده کنی و بهجای تکرار احساس کمبود، ذهنت رو به سمت فراوانی و شایستگی هدایت کنی👌💰💎 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤16
وقتی به پول و وضعیت مالی آیندهات فکر میکنی، بیشتر چه حسی داری؟ 👇
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤12
پول، محصول جانبی موفقیته‼️ ⭕️اما موفقیت از کجا شروع میشه⁉️ 🔹از جایی که یاد میگیری با حس بهتر، ذهن آرومتر و باورهای سازندهتر مسیرت رو ادامه بدی 🔹وقتی بهجای غرق شدن در افکار منفی، روی رشد و فرصتها تمرکز میکنی، نگاهت به زندگی و انتخابهات هم تغییر میکنه✔️ 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤9
پول فقط چیزی نیست که توی حساب بانکیمون میبینیم؛ باورها و احساسات ما نسبت به پول هم روی تصمیمها و رفتارهای مالیمون تأثیر میذارن✅ 🔻اگه همیشه با ترس از دست دادن، احساس کمبود یا باورهای محدودکننده زندگی کنیم، ممکنه حتی فرصتهای خوب رو هم نبینیم👌 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤6
درود ومهر🌟 📌تا حالا فکر کردی چرا با وجود اینکه پول و ثروت رو میخوای، هنوز احساس میکنی بین تو و چیزی که میخوای یه فاصله وجود داره⁉️ شاید وقتشه بهجز تلاش برای بهدست آوردن پول، به رابطهات با پول هم توجه کنی!💸💰 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤7
🔴درهارموکور، روی شناخت خود، باورهای درونی و الگوهایی کار میکنیم که میتونن بر جنبههای مختلف زندگیمون اثر بذارن 🔴اگه میخوای بیشتر با هارموکور آشنا بشی و ببینی چطور میتونه در مسیر خودشناسی و تغییر همراهت باشه، کلمه «هارموکور» رو برامون پیام بده تا راهنماییت کنیم⬇️ 🔴اینجا کلیک کن👆 . .
❤11
یکی از قدمهای مهم برای تغییر، شناخت باورهای محدودکننده و اصلاح الگوهای فکری و رفتاریه💫 📌اینجاست که خودشناسی اهمیت پیدا میکنه؛ چون تا وقتی الگوهای تکراری خودمون رو نشناسیم، ممکنه ناخواسته دوباره همون مسیرهای قبلی رو انتخاب کنیم✅ 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤12👏1
تا حالا شده با اینکه برای تغییر زندگیت تلاش میکنی، احساس کنی باز هم درگیر همون الگوهای تکراری هستی⁉️ مثلاً روابط مشابه، نگرانیهای مالی یا افکاری که مدام به سراغت میان⁉️ بله شده ⬅️❤️ نمیدونم دقت نکردم⬅️🔥 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤12
مثلاً اگه خواهان پیشرفت مالی هستی، اما در عمق ذهنت باور داری که «من هیچوقت موفق نمیشم»، ممکنه این باور روی تصمیمها و فرصتهایی که دنبال میکنی اثر بذاره✅ پس گاهی لازمه قبل از هر تغییری در زندگی بیرونی، نگاهی هم به باورهای درونیمون بندازیم 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤12
🔷در نگاه متافیزیکی، از این مثال برای توضیح مفهوم فرکانس استفاده میشه 🔷اما نکته مهم اینه که صرفاً فکر کردن به یه خواسته، تضمین نمیکنه که اون اتفاق بیفته باورها، احساسات و الگوهای رفتاری ما هم در مسیری که طی میکنیم تأثیر دارن✅ 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤12
🔸بذار با یه مثال ساده برات توضیح بدم👇 تصور کن توی یه محیط شلوغ هستی و میخوای صدات رو به گوش کسی برسونی🗣 اگه آروم صحبت کنی، ممکنه اصلاً صدات رو نشنوه؛ اما وقتی صدات رو بلندتر میکنی، احتمال شنیده شدنت بیشتر میشه👌 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤11
💢تا حالا برات سؤال شده که چرا با وجود فکر کردن به اتفاقات خوب و تلاش برای مثبتاندیشی، بعضی خواستههات هنوز وارد زندگیت نشدن؟ 🤔 مگه نمیگن هر چیزی که بهش فکر کنی، به سمت خودت جذب میکنی⁉️ پس چرا همیشه این اتفاق نمیافته⁉️ 🅾@drgilaki 🔺
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 573 posts we hold for @drgilaki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@drgilaki edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 37 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وقتی به پول و وضعیت مالی آیندهات فکر میکنی، بیشتر چه حسی داری؟ 👇
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔘به نظرت بعد از تموم شدن یک رابطه، کدوم مورد ممکنه بیشتر در آدم باقی بمونه؟
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔷وقتی به پول و درآمد بیشتر فکر میکنی، اولین چیزی که به ذهنت میاد چیه؟
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
به نظرت این مدل فکر کردن چقدر میتونه روی زندگی ما تأثیر بذاره؟؟؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگه قرار باشه همین امروز روی یکی از بخشهای زندگیت بیشتر تمرکز کنی، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟ 👇
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگه قرار باشه فقط یکی از این سه بخش زندگیت تغییر کنه، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟ 👇🏻
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 573 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر گیلکی | آکادمی توسعه فردی” (@drgilaki), 28,452 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drgilaki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.