Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr.Head

Channel

Dr.Head

@drheadpersonal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,472subscribers

+1,574 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329169096
TypeChannel
Username@drheadpersonal
DescriptionВсе новости и события из мира аудио в одном месте! Задавайте вопросы в ЧАТЕ - https://t.me/drheadCHAT Нужна помощь с выбором аудиотехники? Напишите нам: https://t.me/Dr_Head_bot Сайт Dr.Head: https://clck.ru/3J5hsk Номер регистрации в РКН № 7134713005
Created14 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drheadpersonal

Growth

16,87518,53517,7056 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,891 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,886 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,875 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,877 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,881 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,927 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,919 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,920 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,919 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,916 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,072 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,154 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,184 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,282 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,347 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,401 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,535 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,472 subscribers18,4726 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1,574. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,626–18,784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:0418,472-63
27 Aug 2026, 17:2718,535+134
26 Aug 2026, 20:1318,401+1,054
25 Aug 2026, 18:5317,347+65
24 Aug 2026, 20:3417,282+98
23 Aug 2026, 02:2617,184+30
21 Aug 2026, 14:5817,154+82
20 Aug 2026, 17:1317,072+156
19 Aug 2026, 15:3616,916-3
18 Aug 2026, 16:0416,919-1
17 Aug 2026, 18:5216,920+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:0716,919-8
14 Aug 2026, 23:1516,927+46
13 Aug 2026, 13:2816,881+4
12 Aug 2026, 13:1416,877+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:1416,875-14
9 Aug 2026, 10:5116,889+3
8 Aug 2026, 13:1416,886-5
7 Aug 2026, 10:5016,891-8
6 Aug 2026, 14:0016,899first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 18,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held36 (9 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total55,100
Reactions total557
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,690
Videos
757
Links
2,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 44s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

920 reactions across 35 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26028.3%
🔥25227.4%
👍18920.5%
🤣374.02%
custom 5337261159005323968333.59%
😍252.72%
🤔212.28%
❤‍🔥181.96%
🎉181.96%
👀111.20%
👏101.09%
😁101.09%
👎70.761%
💯70.761%
🤝60.652%
😢40.435%
🤯40.435%
👌30.326%
🏆20.217%
🤩20.217%
1 further kind10.109%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,100 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎨 🎨 ПРОВЕРКА ЗАВЕРШЕНА: 🎨 ✅ — ваш музыкальный 🎨 🎨 вкус идеален 🎨 Перешлите тому, чей 🎨 музыкальный вкус давно🎨 🎨 пора исследовать 👀 🎨 🎨 🩵 🎨

10🤣8🔥4custom 53372611590053239681

28 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

28 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,090 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍6

24 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,470 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🎨 🎨 ⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🎨 КАК ЖЕ ДО-О-О-ОЛГО 🎨 МЫ ЭТОГО ЖДАЛИ! 🎨 Noble Audio FoKus Artemis 🎨 наконец-то до нас доехали:🎨 🎨 вживую они выглядят ещё 🎨 лучше, чем на видео, 🎨 а звучат… 🎨 Приходите послушать 🎨 сами — будете одними 🎨 из первых в России 😌 🎨 🩵 🎨

🔥355👍4😍4🤔2🤩2

24 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,140 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎨 🎨 🫤 🎨 🎨 Понимаем, что всех 🎨 сейчас больше волнует, 🎨 состоится ли концерт 🎨 Канье Уэста, но... 🎨

🤔8

22 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈2,600 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🎨 🎨 В комнате прослушивания🎨 🎨 на Новом Арбате, 15, 🎨 которую мы называем 🎨 «хайэндной», большое 🎨 пополнение — к нам 🎨 приехали: 🎨 🎨 🎨 ▫️ акустика Perlisten 🎨 Audio A4t c насыщенным басом, 🎨 чёткой серединой и точными 🎨 высокими 🎨▫️ интегральный усилитель 🎨 Axxess Forte 1 класса D, 🎨 который играет, как класс A 🎨 🎨▫️ виниловый проигрыватель 🎨 Clearaudio Compass, собранный 🎨 вручную в Германии 🎨 🎨▫️ и еще один интег

13👍12🔥3🤔2😍2

20 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,470 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @spdigital_offPhoto

💿 Розыгрыш юбилейного винила МакSим «Трудный возраст» На прошлой неделе МакSим встретилась с поклонниками на презентации юбилейного переиздания альбома «Трудный возраст» — пластинки, которой в этом году исполнилось 20 лет. Но если вы не смогли побывать на презентации лично, у нас есть для вас подарок 🩷 Совместно с Dr.Head и певицей мы разыгрываем юбилейный винил «Трудный возраст» с автографом МакSим. 👉🏼 Правила к

custom 53372611590053239682920🎉6👎3

19 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,630 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎨 🎨 👀 Когда в следующий 🎨 раз выйдете на улицу, 🎨 оглянитесь по сторонам — 🎨 и посчитайте тех, кого 🎨 увидите в «Маршаллах» 🎨 или больших «Эйрподсах» 🎨 (а, скорее, всего, в дешевой 🎨 копии с маркетплейса). 🎨 👉 Скорее всего, вы через 🎨 пару минут собьетесь — 🎨 так много их будет. 🎨 🎨 🎨 🎨 Люди обычно покупают 🎨 их не за хороший звук, 🎨 а просто потому, что это 🎨 самый простой вариант: 🎨 все же их носят... Но мы хотим

👍115

16 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈3,620 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🎨 🎨 🎨 💬 🎨 🎨 А ещё перед 🎨 автограф-сессией🎨 🎨 взяли у МакSим небольшое🎨 🎨 интервью: поговорили про 🎨 винил и музыку, а еще 🎨 вручили нашей гостье 🎨 приятный подарок ✨ 🎨 🎨 🩵 🎨

37🔥12😍4👌3👍2

14 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈3,220 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥298😍7👏3😢3👍2🤔2❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,940 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎨 🎨 До сих пор пытаемся 🎨 прийти в себя после 🎨 автограф-сессии 🎨 МакSим — спасибо, 🎨 что пришли и создали 🎨 настолько волшебную 🎨 атмосферу ✨ 🎨 🎨 Фото прямо сейчас 🎨 отбираем и загружаем: 🎨 включайте уведомления,🎨 🎨 чтобы точно их не 🎨 пропустить 🔔 🎨 🎨 🩵 🎨

28😍4👍3🔥3🤔2

14 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,900 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

23👀1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @drheadpersonal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,452 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr.Head” (@drheadpersonal), 18,472 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drheadpersonal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.