Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DRILL TV

Channel

DRILL TV

@drilltvfreefire

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,877subscribers

+342 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001242054173
TypeChannel
Username@drilltvfreefire
DescriptionОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАНАЛ✅ Free Fire/Фри фаер ❌ DRILL TV никогда не пишет вам в личные сообщения! ⭐️ Все мои каналы: https://t.me/addlist/71UxJ05SlQQ0Yjhi ✍️ Реклама/Сотрудничество: @manager_drilltvfreefire
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drilltvfreefire

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,48132,40531,9437 August 2026 — 31,535 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,535 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,519 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,513 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,481 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,645 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,841 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,989 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,107 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,108 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,194 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,213 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,334 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,398 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,405 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,345 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,343 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,350 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,322 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,305 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,290 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,251 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,163 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,123 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,050 subscribers5 September 2026 — 32,028 subscribers8 September 2026 — 31,910 subscribers11 September 2026 — 31,870 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,859 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,841 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,799 subscribers18 September 2026 — 31,877 subscribers31,8777 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +342. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,342–32,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:0031,877+78
16 Sept 2026, 08:1631,799-42
14 Sept 2026, 16:3831,841-18
13 Sept 2026, 02:1931,859-11
11 Sept 2026, 03:4131,870-40
8 Sept 2026, 08:1631,910-118
5 Sept 2026, 01:3932,028-22
3 Sept 2026, 05:5832,050-73
1 Sept 2026, 23:5332,123-40
31 Aug 2026, 20:3932,163-88
30 Aug 2026, 18:0832,251-39
29 Aug 2026, 17:3432,290-15
28 Aug 2026, 21:0432,305-17
27 Aug 2026, 23:0532,322-28
26 Aug 2026, 20:5632,350+7
25 Aug 2026, 22:0332,343-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:1232,345-60
23 Aug 2026, 10:4832,405+7
22 Aug 2026, 01:0832,398+64
20 Aug 2026, 19:5332,334first reading

Engagement

151 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 31,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,980
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 151 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held151 (31 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total628,630
Reactions total22,166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 07:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,130
Videos
701
Links
1,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 31s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50,961 reactions across 151 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20,11239.5%
🤣9,38518.4%
👍6,24012.2%
🖕2,7545.40%
🔥2,7375.37%
🤩2,7325.36%
🤯1,8853.70%
💔1,8823.69%
🗿1,5833.11%
5000.981%
😨3590.704%
😍2130.418%
2080.408%
😁1660.326%
🎉720.141%
🏆660.13%
😎440.086%
🎄230.045%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
272
across the posts below
Posts paid on
89
of 151 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
19
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drilltvfreefire. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 151 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,310 views110 reactionsread 22 September 2026

☝️ВСЕ НОВОСТИ УЖЕ НА КАНАЛЕ! Бесплатные награды🟥 Когда выйдет эволюция🟩 Наруто часть 2🟦 Когда БЕН-10🟧 Бесплатный набор🟨 Обзор ивентов🟫 Обзор нового пропуска 🟪 Новые события ⬜️ Заранее спасибо за просмотр и лайк!👍

👍8312🤩641🎄1🔥1🗿1

21 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC≈3,340 views52 reactionsread 22 September 2026

https://youtu.be/RS7PFQxICn0?si=-i2q0HlOLFdLoGNq

😁37113👍1

21 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC≈4,820 views314 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Вышел ещё один официальный ролик, в котором показали Пейна, только Наруто здесь решил отдохнуть 🤔😅

🤣25445🗿932💔1

20 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC≈6,380 views323 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Video

✅ Вышел официальный видеоролик, в котором показали Пейна из второй части коллаборации с Наруто! Как думаете, это намёк на возвращение?👀🤔

219🤯46👍20🗿15💔9🤣7😁43

20 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC≈6,650 views185 reactions15 Starsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

🎤 Турнир на 10к💎 через 30 минут тут @drilltv_tournaments (LUCKY турнир, успевать зайти в комнату не надо)

144👍13😁11💔7🗿721

19 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC≈7,220 views375 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

50 человек по 100💎, выбрал под последним видео, как и обещал! Кто-то нашёл свой ID?🤔

💔27163🔥12👍11🗿8🤣5😨5

19 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC≈7,210 views67 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

РАСКРЫВАЕМ ТАЙНЫ 😯 Особенно, когда дело касается скинов по вкусным ценам. Пора заглянуть на Donatov.net и выгодно пополнить алмазы 🍟 Держите дополнительную халяву 😀 💎 30 победителей по 572 алмазов ✔️ Просто подпишитесь на @Donatovnet и нажмите "Участвовать" Ваш надежный тиммейт - Donatov.net ♟

👍4421😁2

19 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC≈7,110 views302 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Сегодня под последним видео выберу 50 человек и отправлю по 110💎! (лайк + напишите ID) *вечером опубликую, кому отправил!

264👍23🔥8🗿5😁1😨1

18 Sept 2026, 22:08 UTC≈7,850 views330 reactions13 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Новое Колесо Фортуны!👊 Дата: 22 сентября✅ Первая попытка бесплатно!

251👍33🤣14🤩9🗿7😨7💔5🔥4

18 Sept 2026, 14:46 UTC≈8,850 views946 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Не могу привыкнуть нажимать эту кнопку, чтобы вещь наделась😂

🤣809👍4743💔16🗿14😁7🤩4😨3

18 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈8,400 views155 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @freefirexdonatovPhoto

🔥 Запускаем розыгрыш на 23 980 алмазов! 😍 Призы: 1-10 места получат 2400 Алмазов 😍 Условия: Просто подпишитесь на Free Fire x Донни и нажмите «Участвовать» 😏А если не хотите ждать - забрать набор можно тут

124👍16🔥105

18 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈8,030 views371 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Video

⚡️Игрок решил улучшить графику Free Fire с помощью технологии DLSS 5 Как вам результат?🤔

🤣21076😨27🤩16🗿11👍109🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @drilltvfreefire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTCAnonymous Poll3,280 voters approx.

КАК ВАМ ОБНОВА?

  1. ⭐️18%
  2. ⭐️⭐️7%
  3. ⭐️⭐️⭐️18%
  4. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️18%
  5. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Болото zabenaffa
@zabenafff · 31,772
#1
Gamer x
@gamerxff · 26,233
#2
AZAMM
@azammfree · 26,068
#3
FREE FIRE LEAKS
@leaksff · 10,286
#4
M1LFOMAN
@m1lfoman1 · 607 (as read 13 September 2026)
#5
MrRepach Free Fire
@Repach_Tv · 4,246
#6
𝕃𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕙𝕜𝕒
@leli4kacis · 708
#7
XRAY ТУТ
@xrayoffff · 3,188
#8
IMADJI
@IM4DJI · 18,187
#9
Rahman TV
@Rahman_botik · 315
#10
Free Fire News CIS
@garena_freefireCIS · 4,967
#11
𝐃𝐄𝐈𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐀
@ttdeidara · 2,710
#12
MELNIKOV
@melnikov_ff1 · 600
#13
HaimeR
@haimer87 · 3,506
#14
ВЕЗУЧИЙ ДОМ🍀
@vezuchiy_ff · 1,198
#15
Free Fire
@DSangelFF · 1,455
#16
Xamka FF
@xamkaff · 5,032
#17
THRASHERONE
@thrasherone · 19,852
#18
the вайбик
@notvaib · 349
#19
Секреты 077 FF
@noumlegaa · 1,981
#20
BABY FF
@babyyy_ff · 5,482
#21
CRAZY FF
@crazy_fff · 2,206
#22
💙ХАРЛИ💙
@harley_off · 414
#23
Гостиная Тиджея
@tJ_chillzone · 2,236
#24
FFNEWS : LACKRIMA 🦉
@LACKRIMAFFNEWS · 877
#25
ОТЦОВСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО
@evgenahata · 101,266
#26
Donatov.net - Донат есть! 💎
@donatovnet · 624,722
#27
lenivaya
@lenivaya_art · 4,437
#28
𝐍𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐒𝐍𝐈𝐘 𝐓𝐕 / ᵀᴿᴺᴹᵀ⚔️
@nebesnyytt · 335
#29
𝑰𝒁𝑼𝑴𝑹𝑼𝑫𝑵𝑨𝒀𝑨ᵗᵗ
@izumrudnaya_tt · 167
#30
ʍᴀndy | ᴄᴏʍʍuniᴛy PC 💻
@Sladkiy_post · 104
#31
вертовы что-то архивят 💨
@vertovu · 21
#32
ZUFARMAX
@zufarmax · 29,332
#33
манка теребоньк
@mankabyebye · 140
#34
veretranga
@oixxse · 70
#35

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AZAMM
@azammfree · 26,068
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 September 2026
Gamer x
@gamerxff · 26,233
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 13 September 2026
Болото zabenaffa
@zabenafff · 31,772
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DRILL TV” (@drilltvfreefire), 31,877 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drilltvfreefire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.