Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 548–601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:56
595
+4
8 Sept 2026, 23:18
591
-1
30 Aug 2026, 09:35
592
-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:59
593
+10
15 Aug 2026, 14:36
583
+26
7 Aug 2026, 23:56
557
+3
7 Aug 2026, 03:48
554
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
122
56.7%
❤
60
27.9%
👏
14
6.51%
👍
9
4.19%
🥰
8
3.72%
🤩
2
0.93%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Минус птоз, плюс уверенность! Подтяжка груди собственными тканями. Возвращаем девичью форму без капли силикона.
Более подробно про подтяжку груди написал в статье на сайте https://dr-kopytich.ru/ru/articles/mammoplasty/mastopexy-guide
Запись на персональную консультацию:
📲 +998(94)720-25-19 Ташкент
📲 +7(963)315-81-29 Москва
#подтяжкагруди
Реконструкция молочных желез экспандерами
Диагноз: рак правой молочной железы, I стадия, трижды негативный, мутация BRCA1. Узел 15 мм, метастазов нет. После химиотерапии опухоль полностью исчезла.
При мутации BRCA стандартно удаляют обе молочные железы с реконструкцией. Но у пациентки малый объем груди, поэтому установка имплантов даст плохой эстетический результат и высокий риск осложнений.
Совместно с пациенткой…
Идеальные контуры без бесконечных диет: как работает липоскульптура?
Многие думают, что идеальная фигура — это результат исключительно жестких ограничений и часов в спортзале. Но давайте будем честны: убрать «ловушки жира» на животе, боках или спине бывает невозможно даже при идеальном весе. А так хочется, чтобы объемы ушли из проблемных зон и добавили сочности там, где это действительно нужно!
Именно эту задачу реша…
Пластика «2-в-1»: как получить идеальный живот и грудь за одну операцию.
Многие думают, что подтяжка живота — это всегда длинный шов внизу. Но современная пластическая хирургия способна на большее. Сегодня хочу поделиться сложным, но очень красивым кейсом.
К нам обратилась молодая пациентка. Главные проблемы: асимметрия груди и выраженные неровности («ямы») на животе после предыдущей неудачной липосакции. Липосакция …
При подтяжке груди с имплантами есть 2 концепции:
Оставить побольше собственных тканей при меньшем объеме импланта.
Использовать имплант побольше, при этом удалить часть железы.
При сохранении большего объема собственных тканей со временем происходит опущение железы и в результате получаем симптом водопада - «сползание железы по импланту».
Если же большую часть железы убрать, то результат операции сохранится на долг…
После массивного снижения веса (на более чем 20 килограммов), многие сталкиваются с одной из самых сложных и эмоционально насыщенных проблем — избыточной растянутой кожей, которая может «висеть» в различных зонах тела. Это не просто физическая проблема, но и серьезный психологический барьер на пути к полноценной жизни. Избавиться от этой ненужной кожи возможно только хирургическим путем, и важно понимать, что это тре…
🔥23❤10👏2
Signed Igor Kopytich
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @drkopytichigor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете можно ли подтянуть грудь и живот через 1 разрез?
Да54%
Нет46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пластический хирург Копытич И.В.” (@drkopytichigor), 595 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drkopytichigor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.