Channel
@drrezatorki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,664subscribers
-373 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002172718213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drrezatorki |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drrezatorki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 2,664 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 2,683 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 2,696 | -27 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 2,723 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 2,742 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 2,783 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 2,812 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 2,833 | -28 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 2,861 | -44 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 2,905 | -27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 2,932 | -58 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 2,990 | -41 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 3,031 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 3,037 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 176 | 94.6% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 5.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. 🔻 تفاوت تاب آوری در انسان ها چرا انسان ها در مواجهه با یک بحران واحد، واکنش های متفاوتی دارند؟ -------------------------------------- ▪️در دنیای روان شناختی این یک اصل ثابت شده است که رویدادهای بیرونی به خودی خود عامل رنج یا فروپاشی ما نیستند بلکه "ارزیابی شناختی" ما و میزان "بارهای انباشته شده" قبلی است که تاب آوری ما را تعیین می کند. ▪️گاهی در زندگی، فروپاشی یک انسان به خاطر آخرین جرقه ای نیست که ب…
👍8
. -قانون ریتمLaw of Rhythm چرا هیچ شرایط و وضعیتی دائمی نیست؟ «اگر امروز روزهای سختی را میگذرانید، به خاطر داشته باشید که تاریخ طبیعت، تاریخ تغییر است؛ نه سکون.» -------------------------------------- ▪️یکی از مفاهیمی که در فلسفه هرمتیک با عنوان قانون ریتم (Law of Rhythm) شناخته میشود، بیان میکند که جهان بر پایه چرخهها و نوسانها حرکت میکند. همانطور که شب جای خود را به روز میدهد، زمستان به بهار میرسد و م…
👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
. 🔺️ رشد پیرامون سوگ - شاید این جمله را زیاد شنیده باشید که زمان همه چیز را حل می کند. - دقیقا مواقعی که در غم و فشار و ناراحتی هستیم، می دانیم که با گذشت زمان اوضاع بهتر می شود و شرایط تحت کنترل در می آید. ---------------------------------- ✔️ اکثر آدم ها فکر می کنند که با گذر زمان درد کوچک تر می شود؛ اما واقعیت این است که درد همچنان به همان اندازه باقی می ماند و این ظرفیت روانی و ظرفیت تحمل ماست که بیشتر می شود.…
👍12
🌱 قدردان هم باشیم...... ▪️دیوارهای بیمارستان، بیشتر از عبادت گاه ها دعای خالصانه شنیده اند. ▪️فرودگاه ها بیشتر از مجالس عروسی بوسه و بغل های واقعی دیده اند. ▪️مردگان بیشتر از زنده ها گل و عذرخواهی دریافت کرده اند ✔️چرا که قدرت پشیمانی بیشتر از قدردانی است. 🔴 قدردان اگر نباشیم؛ بخواهیم یا نخواهیم درگیر پشیمانی خواهیم شد.... #قدردانی #توسعه_فردی #رضا_ترکی 🆔️ https://t.me/drrezatorki 🌐 www.rezatorki.ir .
👍13
🍁 برگی که در پاییز نریزد...... ▪️در چشم برگ های دیگر خائن است. ▪️در نگاه درخت وفادار است. ▪️در نگاه فصل ها، سرکش است. پشت هر نگاهی، حقیقتی نهفته است. و هر قضاوتی، آیینه ای از نگاه بیننده است... #قضاوت_کردن #توسعه_فردی #رضا_ترکی 🆔️ https://t.me/drrezatorki 🌐 www.rezatorki.ir .
👍14
▪️زمانی میرسد که آخرین مسواکتان را می زنید، برای آخرین بار موهایتان را کوتاه میکنید، برای آخرین بار سوار ماشینتان میشوید. ▪️زمانی خواهد رسید که برای آخرین بار صدای بارش باران را میشنوید، به بالا آمدن ماه نگاه میکنید، بوی ذرت بوداده به مشامتان میخورد، گرمای تن کودکی را که در آغوشتان خوابیده حس میکنید و زمانی میرسد که برای آخرین بار عاشق میشوید. ▪️روزی از همین روزها، برای آخرین بار غذا میخورید و اندکی پس از…
👍12
🎙 پادکست کوتاه و شنیدنی ▪️عنوان: دوست واقعی درون ▪️موضوع: توسعه فردی ▪️مدت زمان: کمتر از دو دقیقه ▪️محتوا: رضا ترکی ▪️گوینده: خانم بهمنی ✔️ تا حالا به این فکر کردی که بیشتر وقتا بزرگترین مانع ما برای پیشرفت، آدمای دوروبرمون نیستن، بلکه صدای توی سر خودمونه؟ #پادکست #توسعه_فردی #رضا_ترکی 🆔️ https://t.me/drrezatorki 🌐 www.rezatorki.ir .
👍9
• تعرفه نامحدود مولتی لوکیشن 1 ماهه نامحدود 2 کاربره(VIP 🌐) : 200 -> 150 • برای ثبت سفارش و کسب اطلاعات📩: @Persian2ray | بله @Persian2raybot | ربات @Persian2rayAdmin | تلگرام
👍9
◾️ خطر اجماع کور - تفکر گروهی چگونه شرکت ها را به دام می اندازد؟ 🔻 مقاله ای از Economist ✍️ ترجمه و تلخیص ، دکتر رضا ترکی ‐------------------------------------ ◾️ تصمیمگیری در سازمانها همیشه پیچیده است، اما وقتی همه در تیم میخواهند همنظر و همعقیده باشند، چه اتفاقی میافتد؟ - وقتی استیو بیکر، سیاستمدار و چهره سرسخت برگزیت، و فن دولان، استاد علوم رفتاری و فردی که ماندن بریتانیا در اتحادیه اروپا را…
👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4👎2
*ایران از پای نمیافتد؛ میتپد و به همت فرزانگانش، چون ققنوس، دوباره برمیخیزد؛* بنیاد تعالی اجتماعی زندگی و مؤسسه دانشبنیان برکت برگزار میکنند: *«فراخوان طرحهای فناورانه و نوآورانه برای مواجهه با پیامدهای اجتماعی جنگ»* این فراخوان در راستای شناسایی، معرفی و پشتیبانی از ایدهها و طرحهای پیشنهادی است که میتوانند پاسخگوی مسائل انسانی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی و روانی ناشی از جنگ باشند. 👥*مخاطبان فراخوان*: پژوهشگران،…
👍6👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drrezatorki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر رضا ترکی” (@drrezatorki), 2,664 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drrezatorki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.