7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +200. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:20
220
+59
10 Sept 2026, 16:22
161
no change
10 Sept 2026, 07:19
161
+91
1 Sept 2026, 15:03
70
+44
25 Aug 2026, 02:24
26
+5
16 Aug 2026, 16:24
21
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:38
20
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 18 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3353.4%
avg views ÷ 220 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,380
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.314%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
12 (18 July 2024 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
29,510
Reactions total
64
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
83 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
24
28.9%
🤡
14
16.9%
❤
9
10.8%
💩
8
9.64%
😁
6
7.23%
💯
5
6.02%
🤮
5
6.02%
🍌
3
3.61%
👏
2
2.41%
😱
2
2.41%
✍
1
1.20%
🍾
1
1.20%
👻
1
1.20%
💊
1
1.20%
🦄
1
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2024 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
16.7%
2 of 12 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
532
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
9,060
over 9 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2024 to 9 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Внимание всем держателем DTV тем кто не женат и не замужем!!!
Сейчас вскрылась старая-новая схема шустрил из Казахстана (да, наследили они знатно). Мало кто знает о ней, но те кто работают непосредственно с документами и запросам в посольства, в курсе этого.
Данная ситуация может очень сильно навредить всем кто оформлял фейковые документы по схеме Workation. Те кто все делал легально, проблем нет, но, могут быть ес…
На данный момент мы ищем решения некоторых новых возникших проблем.
В ближайшие несколько дней, а может неделю, опубликуем.
Но многое вещи решаемы, без подделки документов.
МИД Таиланда выложил напоминание что теперь нужно будет докладывать новые документы для DTV виз.
И напомнили что с 30 августа по 31 августа система будет временно недоступна.
Поздравляю всех кто собирался оформлять DTV визы, все дружно выражаем большое спасибо коллективу фотошоперов из Казахстана благодаря которым посольства Таиланда в разных странах постепенно начинают вводить новое требование.
2 новых дополнительны требования при подаче заявления на DTV
1. При подаче заявления нужно быть гражданином или быть постоянным жителем той страны где подается заявление
2. Предоставить справку …
Спалился, отвечай.
В тему вот этой новости https://t.me/REAL_PHUKET/22538 почему это плохо?
Это означает новые проверки, т.е. теперь будут чаще проверять обладателей ДТВ виз. Чаще проверять и спрашивать документы и подтверждения условий по которым вы открыли визу, например если у вас МуайТай, то как часто вы посещали курсы, если кулинарные то отчет как часто вы были на этих курсах, фотки, журналы отметок и прочее.
…
Внимание всем кто оформляет DTV визы удаленно! Не делайте так!
Имейте ввиду что одно из основных требований при оформлении DTV визы вы должны находиться в стране подачи. Игнорирование этого правила является грубейшим нарушением. Например если вы полетели в Вьетнам, или РФ, подали документы и спокойно улетели в другую страну или и того хуже вернулись в Таиланд и ждете визу, в надежде что после одобрения сделаете борд…
Все дружно благодарим мамбетов казахстанских фотошоперов.
Благодаря их действиям в ИИ и фотошопе теперь:
- Чаще вызывают на интервью в посольство (в целом это обычная практика, но не для этого типа визы)
- Чаще отказывают и скоро Вьетнам будет одной из самых сложных локаций для получения DTV
- Сроки рассмотрения выросли
Так же у них появилась новая схема, они предлагают самую низкую цену, и якобы подают доки все пр…
Друзья, напоминаем что на данный момент мы не оформляем фасттреки, зеленый коридор и встречу в аэропорту Бангкока.
Как все восстановится, сообщим.
+66639428668
Бордерран | Зеленый коридор | Фаст-трек | DTV | ED
🚌 Предлагаем организованные групповые и приватные БОРДЕРРАНЫ для обычных поездок и для тех кто хочет обновить DTV пребывание, напрямую от лицензированной компании
📌 Доступны штампы на 30, 60 дней (до момента отмены 60 дней в ближайшее время)
📌 Продление для DTV на 180 дней
📌 Стоимость поездки — 2,300 THB (Пограничный сбор оплачивается отдельно и зависит от срока ви…
DTV VISA на 5 лет, как оформить?
• Легально и прозрачно
• Высокие шансы на одобрение
• Сопровождение до результата и после
Работаем с DTV-визами, опираясь на реальную практику тайских посольств и официальные требования.
До начала - объективная оценка шансов и чёткий план действий.
За прошлый год оформлено более 300 виз.
Стоимость консультаций от 5000 бат.
Стоимость Soft Power от 15000 бат.
• При индивидуальных за…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dtvvisa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DTVvisa” (@dtvvisa), 220 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtvvisa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
