Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дубайский Спецкор

Channel

Дубайский Спецкор

@dubaispetskor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,550subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644841621
TypeChannel
Username@dubaispetskor
Created29 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dubaispetskor

Growth

9,5509,5969,5736 August 2026 — 9,557 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,551 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,575 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,596 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,590 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,582 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,576 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,573 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,574 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,571 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,564 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,550 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,543–9,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 03:159,550-14
3 Sept 2026, 09:199,564-7
31 Aug 2026, 06:559,571-3
28 Aug 2026, 06:229,574+1
25 Aug 2026, 16:429,573-3
22 Aug 2026, 14:379,576-6
18 Aug 2026, 23:529,582-8
15 Aug 2026, 19:379,590-6
12 Aug 2026, 09:499,596+21
9 Aug 2026, 16:019,575+24
6 Aug 2026, 22:319,551-6
6 Aug 2026, 09:349,557first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 9,550 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held36 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total45,610
Reactions total1,358
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,606 reactions across 36 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,28949.5%
👍33412.8%
🔥30011.5%
😁26710.2%
🤣1646.29%
😢351.34%
👀311.19%
🤡301.15%
💯271.04%
👏260.998%
👎230.883%
💔100.384%
🎉90.345%
🤓90.345%
🤔90.345%
🥱80.307%
😨70.269%
😱60.23%
🗿50.192%
🍓40.153%
7 further kinds130.499%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 36 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dubaispetskor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,240 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Давно Дубайского Спецкора не выгоняли из ресторана через 1,5 часа после, не побоюсь этого слова посадки, давно, уже даже и забыл когда. Но это потому что он в Москве. Люди в ресторане, в районе, удаленном от мест основной тусовки, только что не на люстрах сидят. Так что все справедливо( Zuma и Gaia, родные, МЫ СКОРО БУДЕМ

😁3210😱6🔥3

28 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,620 views74 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Сегодня День Эмиратской Женщины и впервые, по высочайшему указу, он будет отмечаться целый месяц. Не забудьте поздравить знакомых эмираток!

62👍9😁3

27 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,830 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ну класс, Frieze Abu Dhabi быть! Сегодня объявили участников выставки, которая пройдёт с 19 по 22 ноября в Saadiyat Cultural District. Больше 80 галерей из 37 стран. Это очень важное событие в местной культурной жизни. Будет проходить вместо привычного Abu Dhabi Art.

🔥2611👍7

27 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,850 views106 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пока Спецкор догуливал зеленую зиму и морально готовился ворваться в дубайские сорок плюс, написал ему знакомый московский дубаец и радостно сообщил, что он обратно и окончательно. Все тут будем, но про этого человека Спецкор просто обязан вам рассказать. Потому что это Вася, любимый шеф-повар Спецкора. Знакомы мы очень давно, ещё с тех пор, когда Вася работал в легендарном ресторане Вильямс. После этого - в Северя

73👍21🔥9👎1🤡1😁1

27 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,760 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спецкор вынужден признать, что театральные постановки, которые привозят в Дубай, чаще всего крайне разочаровывают. То какие - то одни уездные театры мучают Щелкунчика, то другие пытаются станцевать оперу, то слушаем унылый стендап от вышедшего в тираж актера, гордо называемый моноспектаклем. Поэтому Спецкор очень рад вам сообщить, что к нам наконец едет спектакль фестивального уровня. Спектакль-утопия «Человек-Амф

🔥125👍3👎2🥱2🗿1🤔1😁1

25 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈2,010 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Очень неожиданная история в рубрику #поестьруками. Случился в этом сегменте дубайского ресторанного бизнеса скандал. Есть такое легендарное пакистанское место Ravi. Спецкор о нем, конечно, писал. Оно существует уже 48 лет (!). И примерно год назад напротив Музея Будущего появился ресторан Ravi fine dining. Спецкор тоже там был и тоже о нем писал. Так вот. Несколько дней назад первородный Ravi официально объявил о

25👍8🤔5👀2

23 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈2,340 views47 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вечер хороших новостей (для разнообразия) Соглашение о торговле и инвестициях между ОАЭ и Россией официально вступило в силу спустя год после его подписания — этот шаг направлен на укрепление двусторонних экономических связей. Как сообщило Министерство внешней торговли ОАЭ, соглашение призвано усилить сотрудничество в быстрорастущих секторах услуг за счёт установления чётких правил и защитных механизмов для торговл

31🔥9🤡4👍3

23 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,200 views83 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спецкор отчаянно старается не делать из канала вестник смешанных единоборств, но тут такое дело. Сегодня в Абу - Даби завершился чемпионат мира по ММА среди юношей и девушек. Первое общекомандное место у сборной России. Которая вернулась на соревнования с гимном и флагом.

53🔥21🎉9

22 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,190 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вот такие слайды, например

🔥22👎5🤡43💊1

22 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,230 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вот сейчас будет пост и информация ТОЛЬКО для товарищей женщин. Товарищи мужчины, просто пролистните, по-братски. Дорогие сестры, если вы думаете, что Спецкор решил с вами обсудить в тишине косметику, процедуры, моду, домашнее хозяйство или грудное вскармливание, то ни в коем случае. По этой тематике существует миллион других ресурсов. Мы с вами, девочки, обсудим вольную борьбу. Почему это так важно для нас? Потом

44😁27🔥11👎7🤡4💊3🥱2

21 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈2,270 views87 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Министерство здравоохранения Кувейта вступило на путь борьбы с мракобесием. Оно ввело нормативную базу для психотерапии, ужесточив критерии лицензирования и запретив ненаучные практики Под запрет попали: 1) Энергетические и духовные методы терапии: энергетическое целительство, рейки, праническое целительство, лечение камнями и кристаллами, духовное исцеление, «космическое целительство», концепция «звёздных детей»

👍5119🤓9💯3🗿3🥴1😁1

21 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈2,290 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Что ещё успел Спецкор в Москве этим летом? Посетить новенький Тон - центр. Находится на задворках Ленинградского вокзала, поэтому добираться туда на машине/ такси пока ещё небольшой квест, но место, конечно, прикольное. На открытии, по свидетельству очевидцев была «вся Москва», это Спецкор не видел, но готов верить им на слово. А ходил он туда на другое, крайне любопытное мероприятие - выставку работ Андрея Бартен

43👍7😁3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @dubaispetskor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dubaispetskor edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дубай by Nastya Docs
@dubai_nastya_docs · 30,618
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Генконсульство России в Дубае
@dubai_mid · 51,666
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Дубач Новости•Dubai News
@dubai_media · 44,658
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Дубай с огоньком
@dubaitop777 · 39,919
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
Новости Дубай
@dubaimap · 109,940
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Дубай Петрович
@dubai_petrovich · 65,214
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Новости из Арабских Эмиратов
@uaegeneralnews · 37,248
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Дубай Недвижимость 🇦🇪
@dubai_go_uae · 94,284
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Миллиарды
@overbillions · 31,382
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Jobs in Dubai , UAE
@jobs_in_dubai · 96,256
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Dubai
@dubai · 122,453
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
YUNA / Юния Пугачева
@yunapugacheva · 28,325
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Зарубежная недвижимость | Whitewill
@whitewilldubai · 29,241
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дубайский Спецкор” (@dubaispetskor), 9,550 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dubaispetskor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.