Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ребенок Подземелья

Channel

Ребенок Подземелья

@dunge0nch1ld

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

762subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065404911
TypeChannel
Username@dunge0nch1ld
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dunge0nch1ld

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

753762757.58 August 2026 — 753 subscribers8 August 2026 — 753 subscribers16 August 2026 — 755 subscribers24 August 2026 — 760 subscribers31 August 2026 — 757 subscribers9 September 2026 — 762 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 752–763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:57762+5
31 Aug 2026, 05:13757-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:27760+5
16 Aug 2026, 04:09755+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:00753no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:52753first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8254.3%
❤‍🔥4932.5%
😢149.27%
custom 543605953296075073342.65%
custom 543596610024219176010.662%
🗿10.662%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dunge0nch1ld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC166 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

НЕ забытый ТЕЙБЛЧЕК! По немного восстанавливаюсь с покрасом миниатюр, но чем то другим вообще пока не могу заняться. Сегодня начал пить новый антидепрессант, по началу стало гораздо легче в мгновение, а потом я зашел в твиттер и сгорел чуть ли до панички.... В остальном движемся медленно, но верно. Надо бы поменьше правда потреблять контента, тогда должно стать легче делать его. И как всегда: ▪️Рассказывайте как де

❤‍🔥13🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC218 views32 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем работать над виньеткой в Испанию, редко у меня появляются заказчики из-за бугра, и так же редко на орков) Первый носильщик в большей степени готов, возможно подправлю что-то в будущем. #DungeonWip #miniature #orcs #Longsnout

🔥29custom 54360595329607507333

30 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC343 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ТЕЙБЛЧЕК! Но без картиночный, потому что я за эту неделю ничего не покрасил кроме подставки и сейчас буду гундеть об этом в угоду хейтерам. Я сходил к другому психотерапевту и мне все же сказали что большой шанс наличия СДВГ и правда есть, из-за чего я сейчас буду менять основной препарат и мне нужно слезть с паксила. Но вот оказалось, что паксил имеет очень жесткий синдром отмены, причем ладно головные боли можно п

😢14❤‍🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC444 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне тут впервые заказали сделать виньетку. И не просто кто-то, а сам автор The Longsnouts. Запрос был в том что бы поместить модельки в степную поляну. Все пытаюсь овладеть покрасом травы и земели аэром и эмалями, как это делает Nightshift, но до его уровня еще далеко. #DungeonPaint #Miniature #Longsnout #orcs

🔥30🗿1

24 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC531 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще один BOY для моей банды в мордхейм. В этот раз чемпион, банда красится крайне быстро для меня. #DungeonPaint #Orcs #Mordheim #warhammer

❤‍🔥33🔥2custom 54359661002421917601

23 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC357 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пыпыпы. ТЕЙБЛЧЕК Мажу тут снова ланкснекхтов от VaeVictis. Постов опять не много было за последнее время, пытаюсь закскульптить минечку для бустеров, и фрустрирую с рисованием. И как всегда: ▪️Рассказывайте как дела ▪️Показывайте в комментариях свои работы за неделю ▪️Просите помощи, если нуждаетесь #DungeonTableCheck #miniature #DnD

🔥20custom 54360595329607507331

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @dunge0nch1ld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ребенок Подземелья” (@dunge0nch1ld), 762 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dunge0nch1ld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.