Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دانیجت | Dunijet

Channel

دانیجت | Dunijet

@dunijet_ai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,436subscribers

+743 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470932342
TypeChannel
Username@dunijet_ai
Descriptionامیرحسینم یه برنامه نویس که عاشق کاوش تو دنیای هوش مصنوعیه بیا با هم در این دنیا غرق بشیم 🔥 پشتیبانی دوره ها 🆔 @dunijet_support آموزش هوش مصنوعی 💠 https://instagram.com/dunijet تهیه دوره ها 💺 https://dunijet.ir
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dunijet_ai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6936,5966,144.56 August 2026 — 5,693 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,694 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,056 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,185 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,274 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,316 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,332 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,477 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,555 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,596 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,584 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,571 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,539 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,507 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,482 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,461 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,442 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,431 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,425 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,436 subscribers6,4366 August 20262 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net +743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,558–6,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 15:216,436+11
30 Oct 2026, 19:176,425-6
24 Oct 2026, 06:276,431-11
17 Oct 2026, 16:186,442-19
14 Oct 2026, 11:556,461-21
10 Oct 2026, 16:416,482-25
4 Oct 2026, 22:596,507-32
25 Sept 2026, 19:186,539-32
17 Sept 2026, 11:586,571-13
13 Sept 2026, 15:406,584-12
10 Sept 2026, 02:186,596+41
4 Sept 2026, 18:596,555+78
31 Aug 2026, 21:076,477+145
28 Aug 2026, 18:266,332+16
25 Aug 2026, 16:036,316+42
22 Aug 2026, 14:256,274+47
19 Aug 2026, 05:256,227+42
16 Aug 2026, 02:486,185+129
12 Aug 2026, 19:436,056+334
9 Aug 2026, 22:125,722first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 6,436 subscribers
Avg views / post
703
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.873%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held87 (25 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total24,615
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
234
Links
905

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 80 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27845.3%
👍15224.8%
🤣569.12%
😁528.47%
🔥233.75%
🤔101.63%
😢71.14%
🤨71.14%
👎50.814%
🕊50.814%
👨‍💻30.489%
😍30.489%
😎30.489%
🤯30.489%
🥰30.489%
👏20.326%
🎉10.163%
🤷‍♂10.163%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (17.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 04:16 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

یکی با GPT-6 Astra وزن‌های یه شبکه عصبی رو مستقیم ساخت و باهاش بازی کرد توی r/singularity یکی امتحان کرده به‌جای اینکه مدل کد بنویسه، خود وزن‌ها رو تولید کنه. بازی پونگ رو با چند تا شبکه کوچیک، هر کدوم با یه وظیفه مشخص، ساخت. ساخت وزن‌ها حدود ۸ دقیقه طول کشیده و حدود ۲۰۰ هزار توکن خورد یه ادیتور زنده هم ساخته که می‌شه وزن‌ها رو وسط بازی عوض کرد؛ مثلا با تغییر یه نورون، توپ دیگه به چپ نمی‌ره. ذین یعنی هزینه آموزش …

🤯2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC440 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

حالا به نظرت برای امسال باید چیکار کنم باز فردا میشه تولد من و من دوست دارم یه کار باحال بکنم ه نظرت می‌خوام چیکار کنم؟ 😁

❤7

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC434 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

یکم جلوتر اومدم از سایت جدید رونمایی کردم خب همون که محمد و مسعود زحمتشو کشیده بودن و با Next JS توسعه پیپا کزده بود. تاتی تاتی آبان پارسال رلیز شد. یه سایت خیلی زیبا سریع و به درد بخور 👌🏻❤️

❤2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC422 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

پیام پارسال دقیقا همین روز جایی که ثبت نام دوره‌ها داشت با کارت به کارت انجام می‌شد و یه ربات هوشمند ساخته بودیم که عکس رسید رو چک میکرد.

❤2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC467 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026

اشتباه اول تاوانِ بی‌تجربگیه، ولی اشتباه دوم نتیجه‌ی انکار واقعیت و خودفریبیه. اشتباه دوم یعنی نادیده گرفتنِ درسی که زندگی با کلی اشک و تاوان بهت یاد داده بود. @dunijet_ai

👍15❤5

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC546 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

اگه خاطرتون باشه اون زمانی که deepseek اومده بود بحث بحث ریاضیات بود، یه جور کل کل ریاضی راه افتاده بود و اون روز دیپسیک تو ریاضی خیلی خوب بود واسه همین سهام شرکت‌های آمریکایی ریخت و گفتن چین داره خودی نشون میده! الان دیگه ریاضیات خیلی برای این مدل راحت شده و با ابزارهایی که در اختیار دارند خیلی راحت می‌تونن محاسبات پیچیده رو با tools هاشون انحام بدن اما کل کل همچنان ادامه داره و یکی از این بحث‌هایی که الان جذابه ب…

❤4

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

6 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC687 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

شرکت Anthropic روی ۲۰۷ هزار مکالمه تحقیقاتی Claude و Claude Code بررسی کرده تا ببینه دانشمندا چطور ازش استفاده می‌کنن بیشترین استفاده توی علوم رسمی مثل کامپیوتر و ریاضی و آماره و کمترین توی سلامت و علوم آزمایشگاهی. یک‌سوم مکالمه‌های Claude و تقریبا نصف Claude Code فقط تحلیل داده‌ست، بعدش نوشتن. جالب اینکه تولید ایده کم استفاده می‌شه، هرچند خود پژوهشگرا توی نظرسنجی گفتن مهم‌ترین بخش کشف علمیه. توی سناریوی خوش‌بینانه…

❤3

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

5 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC618 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🤖 گری تن، مدیرعامل Y Combinator، ابزار gstack رو اوپن‌سورس کرده که Claude Code رو به یه تیم مهندسی مجازی تبدیل می‌کنه هفت نقش داره: مدیرعامل که محصول رو بازتعریف می‌کنه، مدیر مهندسی که معماری رو قفل می‌کنه، طراح، ریویوئر، مسئول QA که مرورگر واقعی باز می‌کنه، افسر امنیت با آدیت OWASP و STRIDE و مهندس ریلیز که PR رو می‌فرسته. همه‌ش اسلش‌کامند و Markdown و رایگانه، با لایسنس MIT. نصبش حدود ۳۰ ثانیه‌ست و به Bun نسخه ۱.…

❤2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

5 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC636 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

یه ستاره‌شناس آماتور با کمک Claude Code توی داده‌های عمومی تلسکوپ TESS یه سیاره جدید پیدا کرد 😂😂👌🏻 اسم این بابا Rabtsevich هست و ۷۴ تا تست طراحی کرد تا فرضیه خودش رو رد کنه. توی یکی از تست‌ها دو دیتاست TESS رو به Claude Code داد و ازش خواست افت نور ستاره رو توی دیتاست سوم پیش‌بینی کنه؛ همه پیش‌بینی‌ها درست از آب دراومد. هنوز این یه کاندیداست، نه سیاره تأییدشده gizmodo.com/did-claude-help-an-amateur-astronomer-dis…

🔥2❤1🤯1

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

5 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC631 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

توی روز روشن همه‌ی شیشه‌ها قشنگن، اما شیشه‌ی صیقل‌خورده واقعی وقتی می‌درخشه که تاریکی همه‌جا رو گرفته باشه و یک نور از درونش بتابه!

❤6👍1

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

5 Nov 2026, 10:46 UTC654 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

اوپن‌ای‌آی نسخه جدید ChatGPT Images 2.6 رو رونمایی کرد. قابلیت ساخت GIF متحرک از متن یا تصویر رو اضافه کردن. همچنین دو مدل جدید GPT-Image-2.6 Flare و Sunburst به API اضافه شدن. Flare تصویر رو در ۶ ثانیه می‌سازه و Sunburst کیفیت بالاتری داره. فعلا مدل های تصویرساز OpenAI بهترین مدل های تصویر ساز هستند. @dunijet_ai

❤2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

5 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC708 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

یه اتفاق عجیب و جالب افتاده تا الان بحث فقط بحث training بود و اینکه ما هیچی از این مدل بلک باکسی که ساخته شده نمی‌فهمیم و یه سری عدد هستند فقط. اما آیا هوش مصنوعی هم نمی‌فهمه؟ پژوهشگرهای MIT یه مدل سبک Qwen رو دادن به GPT-6 Astra و ازش خواستن مستقیم روی وزن‌هاش دست ببره بدون هیچ آموزش اضافی، فقط ویرایش عددها نتیجه: نمره ریاضی مدل از ۷.۹ درصد رسید به ۴۸.۱ درصد، با تغییر فقط ۰.۰۱۶ درصد وزن‌ها توی تست‌ دیگه ای هم As…

🤔2

Signed Amir Hossein Mohammadi

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @dunijet_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @dunijet_ai as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دانیجت | Dunijet” (@dunijet_ai), 6,436 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dunijet_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.