现在有位的哥哥们

Channel
朵朵的朋友圈
@duoduode61
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
596subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003982131577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @duoduode61 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 16 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/duoduode61 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 596 | +31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 565 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55.8%
- avg views ÷ 596 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 333
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.156%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,650 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】朵朵 【联系方式 @Styxvj12 【验证留名】 书包 【验证日期】9月2号 【上课价位】 600p 【人照几分】9.5分 【服务过程】 本月第一炮送给了朵朵老师,老师没有让我失望,服务,情绪都到位,唯一让我迷恋的是胸,就算完事回家后还会去想老师,这是非常难得的,值得推荐 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot) 并须附:确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图,遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图(如现金,请说明)交流主群:https://t.me/Dgx07
开课啦宝宝们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】朵朵 【联系方式】@Styxvj12 【验证留名】敏感 【验证日期】8月26 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分]9 【服务过程]本人比相片漂亮,牙齿很白,嘴唇的性感度让人冲动,洗澡后互相交流后,老师非常主动的直接就是深度舌吻,整个人不受控制的就想扑上去,深吻交流后配合老师来个69,一个字爽,按照小视频学习的舌功舔的老师不断的呻吟。 朵朵老师的调情服务正常开始,在伴随着舔胸进行,瞬间小弟就不受控制的站立起来,害怕在老师面前空射,及时制止老师舔胸,直接开始打桩行动,由于老师身材太给力啦,打桩过程中多次调整姿势,增强自己的强势输出,经过漫长岁月还是缴枪,这时老师给了一个激励人心的舌吻,但实在是力不从心,勉强的动了几下彻底败在了老师裙下! 下了战场为了挽回男人的自尊心,厚脸皮的问老师我的功夫如何,老师深情的看着我,轻轻的吻了我的唇,侧耳回我她很开心! …
❤1
开课啦宝宝们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】朵朵 【联系方式】 @styxvj12 【验证留名】高强 【验证日期】8月21日 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】见到老师本人比照片好看,很耐看越看欲望越强,惊喜的是老师活泼开朗,善聊,体贴,乖巧,配合度极高,长得美不说,身材也好, 胸大,胸型好看 腿长又白,翘臀线条很好,让我爱不释手,老师给我服务的时候,我都快有点控制不了了。视觉效果太棒了。吃棒棒的样子都能那么美 ,眼神勾魂,好久没有这种体验感了。兴奋不已。迫不及待地上套爱抚,小穴很紧很暖很润,好难顶啊,各方面素 质都很不错,属于极品女孩,很值得出击。 支持匿名报告,匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。(积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评,所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧) 打分标准:6分及格,7分漂亮,8分优质,9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot) …
开课啦家人们
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】朵朵 【联系方式】 @styxvj12 【验证留名】阡陌纵横 【验证日期】8月20日 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】很不错的一位老师,到达目的地之后,进门第一眼是我喜欢的温柔类型。颇有邻家姐姐的感觉。老师帮洗擦身子老师滑嫩的身体压在身上。不觉得沉重,老师轻轻爱抚着我的胸口。还害羞的询问是否有感觉,口的时候没有齿感,口的我很舒服,还很温柔。小手抚摸着我的全身。小弟受不了诱惑抬起了头,进入战斗状态,翻身将老师压下。自然而然地找到了两个中心。细细把玩揉搓,老师的小穴慢慢湿润起来。战斗环境已然就绪。老师配合着输出,最后换上后入的姿势,我手也没闲双手揉搓着老师的胸。最后冲刺交了货,体验感很不错中途换了好几种姿势,老师也没有不耐烦,而是很配合我,也不催你啥的,水超级多,一个很不错的老师,下次再来返 https://t.me/Dgx07
❤1
宝子们七夕节有要约的吗
开课啦宝子们
❤1
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】朵朵 【联系方式】 @styxvj12 【验证留名】方言里 【验证日期】8.19 【上课价位】600p 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程】遥控上楼后,打开门看到老师,很对我的口味,照片虽然美颜了,但是本人更真实性感好看啊,一见面反而有点紧张了。身高颜值都在线,对于性感嫩妹,完全没抵抗力。洗完就迫不及待的开始了。本想着我来帮妹妹把衣服脱掉,心里还盘算着AV里的场景。退去衣服后,特别活动,都不需要口,小弟就立正了。玩弄了一下,手都不够用,两个大灯太耀眼。感觉差不多了,戴上TT就开始了。先是女上,但是感觉太好了,怕太快,就换了一个后入的姿势,这个我好自己控制。真是完美炮架呀,真想拍下来给兄弟们欣赏。一阵操作后,累得我大汗珠直冒。最后把控不住,全释放了。完事后时间还没到,真是有点紧张了,抱着小姐姐聊了会天,真是意由未尽呀,无奈想做两次感觉,自己又不行了,只能下次再约了…
有位可以约宝子们
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duoduode61. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“朵朵的朋友圈” (@duoduode61), 596 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duoduode61.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.