Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π˜Ώπ™π™π˜½π˜Όπ™‰ 𝘿𝘼𝘿𝘼 π™„π™‰π™π™€π™π™‰π˜Όπ™π™„π™Šπ™‰π˜Όπ™‡ π™π™„π™‹π™‹π˜Όπ™

Channel

π˜Ώπ™π™π˜½π˜Όπ™‰ 𝘿𝘼𝘿𝘼 π™„π™‰π™π™€π™π™‰π˜Όπ™π™„π™Šπ™‰π˜Όπ™‡ π™π™„π™‹π™‹π˜Όπ™

@durban_data

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

24,767subscribers

-3,299 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172018764
TypeChannel
Username@durban_data
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/durban_data

Topic

Sports β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,76728,06626,416.515 August 2026 β€” 28,066 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 27,875 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 27,522 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 27,338 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 27,023 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 26,920 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 26,891 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 26,820 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 26,774 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 26,699 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 26,582 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 26,554 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 26,520 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 26,325 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 26,162 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 26,032 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 25,849 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 25,722 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 25,536 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 25,487 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 25,394 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 25,299 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 25,026 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 24,884 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 24,832 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 24,767 subscribers15 August 202619 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 35 days, net -3,299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,272–28,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:1724,767-65
16 Sept 2026, 20:5824,832-52
14 Sept 2026, 22:0224,884-142
13 Sept 2026, 06:1625,026-273
11 Sept 2026, 11:3825,299-95
8 Sept 2026, 19:1825,394-93
5 Sept 2026, 09:0025,487-49
3 Sept 2026, 15:1525,536-186
2 Sept 2026, 10:3325,722-127
1 Sept 2026, 12:2525,849-183
31 Aug 2026, 12:2926,032-130
30 Aug 2026, 11:0326,162-163
29 Aug 2026, 12:3326,325-195
28 Aug 2026, 12:3726,520-34
27 Aug 2026, 10:3726,554-28
26 Aug 2026, 11:4626,582-117
25 Aug 2026, 11:4626,699-75
24 Aug 2026, 14:3626,774-46
22 Aug 2026, 22:0726,820-71
21 Aug 2026, 11:5426,891first reading

Engagement

187 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
8.30%
avg views Γ· 24,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
91 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.96%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
91
of 187 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held187 (13 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total187,150
Reactions total14,896
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

29,176 reactions across 187 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.03% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸŽ‰2,0517.03%
⚑2,0427.00%
❀2,0186.92%
πŸ‘2,0096.89%
πŸ‘Œ2,0086.88%
😱2,0086.88%
🀩1,9726.76%
❀‍πŸ”₯1,9546.70%
πŸ’―1,9466.67%
πŸ‘1,9246.59%
😍1,9176.57%
πŸ”₯1,8956.50%
πŸ’‹1,8536.35%
πŸ†1,7976.16%
πŸ₯°1,7826.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 187 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 29,176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTCβ‰ˆ2,020 views115 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Cα΄€Κ€Ιͺʙʙᴇᴀɴ PʀᴇᴍΙͺᴇʀ Lα΄‡α΄€Ι’α΄œα΄‡ 2026 03Sept 04:30 ᴀᴍ 24α΄›Κœ α΄›20 α΄α΄€α΄›α΄„Κœ Trinbago Knight ᴠꜱ AΙ΄α΄›ΙͺΙ’α΄œα΄€ Mα΄€α΄›α΄„Κœ α΄‘Ιͺɴɴᴇʀ βž– Trinbago Knight Lᴏꜱꜱ α΄„α΄œα΄› & ʙᴏᴏᴋ κœ±α΄‡α΄› 17 α΄˜α΄‡κœ±α΄‡ Trinbago Knight α΄‘ΙͺΙ΄ α΄›ΚœΙͺꜱ α΄α΄€α΄›α΄„Κœ

❀‍πŸ”₯21😍13πŸ‘Œ12πŸ’‹11🀩10😱10⚑8πŸ‘8

2 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTCβ‰ˆ2,060 views213 reactionsread 3 September 2026

EUROPEAN T-20 LEUGUE 2025 ❀️❀️ 11th T-20 Match Boom Boom HogaπŸ’° Boom Boom HogaπŸ’° Boom Boom HogaπŸ’° Belfast V/S Edinburgh Winner πŸ‘‰ Belfast πŸ† Durban Dada - International Tipper

😱26πŸ‘Œ23πŸ₯°23❀21⚑20πŸ’‹20πŸ‘17πŸ”₯17

2 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTCβ‰ˆ2,060 views146 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Belfast Jitega Ye Match Target Chase Ho Jayga... Galti Se Bhi Apni Team Ko Khana Mat... Rate Aate Hi Entry Kar Lena... Bindaas Khelo Bekhauf Khelo Dil Khol K Khelo... Durban Dada

πŸŽ‰17😱17⚑16πŸ‘16πŸ”₯15🀩15πŸ’‹14πŸ₯°12

2 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTCβ‰ˆ2,070 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

77-9 πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ EDINBURGH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ

πŸ†11❀‍πŸ”₯9πŸ‘9🀩9😱9πŸ’―7πŸ₯°7πŸ‘5

2 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTCβ‰ˆ2,060 views144 reactionsread 3 September 2026

77-9 πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ EDINBURGH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Khao Edinburgh Ko Belfast Win Karo... Durban Dada

πŸ‘Œ18πŸ’―17🀩16⚑14❀‍πŸ”₯14❀13πŸ‘12πŸŽ‰11

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,080 views223 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

7k To 21k +++

🀩26πŸ’―24πŸ₯°23πŸ‘22πŸ†21πŸ”₯21⚑20❀‍πŸ”₯19

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,120 views117 reactionsread 3 September 2026

SHARING WORK DONE&DUSTED ❀️❀️πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

πŸ’‹16πŸ’―13πŸ₯°13❀11πŸ”₯11πŸ†10😱10πŸ‘Œ9

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,020 views199 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ‘24πŸŽ‰22🀩22πŸ‘Œ18πŸ’―18πŸ₯°18πŸ”₯17😱17

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,020 views139 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ”₯17πŸ’―16🀩16πŸ‘14πŸ‘13😍13⚑12❀10

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,000 views127 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😱18πŸ‘Œ15😍15πŸ‘12πŸŽ‰11πŸ”₯11🀩11πŸ’―10

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,990 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ†16πŸ”₯13❀12πŸ‘12πŸ’‹12πŸ’―10😱10πŸ₯°9

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,990 views227 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚑29❀27πŸ‘26πŸ‘Œ22😍22❀‍πŸ”₯21πŸ‘18πŸ’―18

Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @durban_data. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ARYAN BETTING GURUJI ❂
@Aryan_ipl_Match_Winner Β· 96,410
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here β€” alongside 59 others β€” read 16 August 2026
Malik Mumbai
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro18 Β· 70,224
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here β€” alongside 40 others β€” read 19 August 2026
BADSHAH KING OF CRICKET
@BadshahCricketkings Β· 100,913
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here β€” alongside 53 others β€” read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ˜Ώπ™π™π˜½π˜Όπ™‰ 𝘿𝘼𝘿𝘼 π™„π™‰π™π™€π™π™‰π˜Όπ™π™„π™Šπ™‰π˜Όπ™‡ π™π™„π™‹π™‹π˜Όπ™β€ (@durban_data), 24,767 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durban_data.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.