Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,087–1,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 19:38
1,125
-1
3 Sept 2026, 22:21
1,126
+4
31 Aug 2026, 02:52
1,122
+3
27 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,119
+11
25 Aug 2026, 03:56
1,108
+8
18 Aug 2026, 22:59
1,100
+2
15 Aug 2026, 15:18
1,098
+4
12 Aug 2026, 04:53
1,094
+1
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
1,093
+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:20
1,092
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
1,092
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
392 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
216
55.1%
custom 5370839844685628858
59
15.1%
💔
27
6.89%
custom 5224494791194068818
25
6.38%
custom 5370583181734985755
25
6.38%
custom 5454313393076843868
11
2.81%
custom 5370578732148866698
10
2.55%
custom 5454279278151611915
10
2.55%
custom 5307981417760710216
3
0.765%
custom 5226929543729663271
2
0.51%
custom 5453996467440081058
2
0.51%
custom 5454101157267910942
1
0.255%
custom 5454378891328111290
1
0.255%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dvizhnn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌅DVIZH WEEKEND 2026🎞️
Друзья, DVIZH WEEKEND 2026 пролетел, но оставил после себя шлейф невероятных воспоминаний, ярких моментов и мощного заряда позитива!
Мы до сих пор переполнены эмоциями от этих насыщенных выходных, полных приключений, новых знакомств и незабываемых впечатлений.
Огромное спасибо каждому из вас, дорогие участники DVIZH WEEKEND 2026!
Вы — сердце нашего Движа!
Ваша энергия, открытость, смех и готов…
DVIZH NN ПРИГЛАШАЕТ НА ЗАХВАТЫВАЮЩИЙ СПЛАВ 8-9 АВГУСТА⛺
Друзья, пришло время отключиться от городской суеты, перезагрузиться и почувствовать настоящую силу единения в незабываемом приключении!
Что нас ждёт?
• Два дня полного погружения в природу: густые леса, невероятные пейзажи, живописные берега с разнообразной флорой и фауной!
• Настоящий экшен на байдарках: гребём, смеёмся, преодолеваем препятствия и наслаждаем…
Tour to Türkiye 2026🇹🇷 🚌
Говорят, счастье — это не пункт назначения, а сама дорога. И наша дорога в Турцию пахла свободой, кофе с заправок и предвкушением чего-то огромного.
Тысячи километров в автобусе, где через пару часов чужие люди становятся роднее всех на свете. Мы везли с собой не чемоданы, а свои истории, шрамы и надежды. Везли ту самую "молодость", которую так отчаянно пытаемся сохранить.
Макс, спасибо за т…
Новость раз!
Локация на любимом Горьковском море🌇
Закрытая территория с парковкой
Новость два!
Помимо туалетов, организуем на локации 2 душевые кабинки 🚿
DVIZH WEEKEND 17–19 ИЮЛЯ🏕
Мы объявляем общий палаточный сбор🔥
Движ, который превращает обычные дни в маленький мир под открытым небом. Мы собираемся вместе, чтобы слушать музыку под звёздами, делиться историями и находить новых близких по духу людей. Утро начинается с запаха хвои и свежего кофе из походной кружки, ночи — с импровизированных концертов и разговоров до рассвета.
Мы создаём лагерь из палаток, где каждый …
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dvizhnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dvizh @dvizhculture · 43,220 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DVIZH NN” (@dvizhnn), 1,125 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dvizhnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
