Channel
@dwayyto0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
471subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002002245252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dwayyto0 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dwayyto0 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 471 | +9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 462 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 460 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 465 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 476 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 477 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 476 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 476 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤⇝ @qarabalx قەرەباڵخ 🖤⇝ @sya_sfld04 سیا 🖤⇝ @muhimnitt موهیم نیت 🖤⇝ @rojinjjjjjjj رۆژین 🖤⇝ @bawashy_aw باوەشی ئەو 🖤⇝ @Pr1nc3ss_101 پرینسس 🖤⇝ @eilh4m ئیلهام 🖤⇝ @nuysid نوسید 🖤⇝ @sha_rab721 شەراب 🖤⇝ @Prta_qaly821 پرتەقال 🖤⇝ @derek_821 دیریک 🖤⇝ @charapisss چارە 🖤⇝ @d4nge_dll دەنگی دڵ 🖤⇝ @Xurwr خرور 🖤⇝ @beetooy بێ تۆیی 🖤⇝ @habuniau هەبوونی ئەو 🖤⇝ @daryai_xam دەریای خەم 🖤⇝ @nafr4ati1 نەفرەتی 🖤⇝ @AwadanY_RuH روح 🖤⇝ @zardaj…
🩵𝙰𝙻𝙾𝙽𝙴 𝚅𝙸𝙿 𝙻𝙸𝚂𝚃🩵 🩵ئەلۆنی ڤی ئای پی لیست🩵 ●━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━● 🩵 ئەو چەناڵانەی ئەدرەوشێنەوە لە تیلیگرام • 🩵 ئێستا جۆین بن سەپۆرتی خۆتان دەرخەن • 🩵 بۆ بەژداری کردن لە لیست یاساکانی خوارەوە پێڕەو بکە • 🩵 لیستی ئەلۆنییە ڕکابەری نییە • ●━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━🩵چەناڵەکانم🩵━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━● 🩵 𝙼𝚈 𝙲𝙷𝙰𝙽𝙽𝙴𝙻 ➠ @al0nem ئەلۆنی 🩵 𝙼𝚈 𝙲𝙷𝙰𝙽𝙽𝙴𝙻 ➠ @waset_821 وەسێت 🩵 𝙼𝚈 𝙲𝙷𝙰𝙽𝙽𝙴𝙻 ➠ @aini_islam ئاینی ئیسلام 🩵 𝙼…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
چـــــــــــــاوەکـــــــــــــانــــــت لــــــە بــــــــــیــــــر نـــــــــاکـــــرێــــــــت
..💔
👏1
چارەسەر نەکرا ، لەناوی ببە
بێ رەحمم چونکە رەحمم لە یەک کەس نەبینی خراپم چونکە باشەم لە کەس نەبینی..🙂↔️
هەتا چلەت ڕۆشت چل ساڵم لێ ڕۆشت💔
هەڵەمان نەکرد بەڵکو زیاد لە پێویست دڵمان باشبوو...٠
ئاگاداری لایەنی قسە خۆشیەکەم بە چونکە باش دەزانم چۆن بێدەنگ بم و جارێکی تر هەرگیز قسەت لەگەل نەکەمەوە.
❤1
بێدەنگی من کارەساتە لە بێدەنگی تۆ ناچێت...🖤
زۆر هەبووم بۆیە نیت.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dwayyto0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 93 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dwayyto0 named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هــــــــیـــچـــــ..” (@dwayyto0), 471 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dwayyto0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.