Channel
@dyuchessbeads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003097918933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dyuchessbeads |
| Description | всем привет!! я Даша и тут я плету из бисера🪽 лс владельца: @meawxvl др канала: 31.08.2025 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dyuchessbeads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 26 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 26 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
14 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 6 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
всем привет!! я бы хотела извиниться за свой неактив у меня в жизни сейчас очень тяжёлый период, я старалась вернуться к ведению канала, но как видете не вышло скоро будет два поста, надеюсь, что сейчас вернусь в канал
всех с ддс!! 🫶🏻 кстати у меня почти готовы две ами, скоро буду активна
💘2
выберите 🙏🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
всех с летом!)
❤🔥1💘1
всем привет!! наконец у меня закончилась учёба🎉 у меня огромная мотивация плести, так что ждите) а так же всех поздравляю с ддс 😘
🤗3💘1
Channel name was changed to «𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒅𝒚𝒖𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒔 🧁ˎˊ˗»
почему желание плести приходит только тогда, когда нет возможности это делать😭
Христос Воскрес! 🐣💫
Всем добрый вечер! 💋 Хоть и с некоторым опозданием, но выкладываю, наконец, итоги теста на Джуди и Ника 🤙 Сплели, к сожалению, не все, но очень многие, за что спасибо, и вы только посмотрите, какие красивые они получились 😎 • @DianaSiu / @D_biser • @sofchiks27 / @bicerokbiser • @armatyra_OLEG / @biserolendiya • @ParrotArrra / @only_biser_only • @lanabise / @ilanabiser • @Anori_v / @Bloomy_biser • @tankssek58 / …
эти малыши парные с замечательной @ParrotArrra подписываемся на её канал - @only_biser_only мне очень нравятся её работы😻 очень нравятся цвета, которые она подобрала для Ника и Джуди оценочку нашим работам😇 #парныеработы
❤2💘1🔥1
всем привет!! сегодня покажу вам Джуди и Ника из Зверополиса😻 плела их на тест клубничного зайчика, спасибо ей за возможность протестить схему 😇 это мой первый тест после длительного перерыва, очень рада, что возвращаюсь в бк они получились очень миленькими и прикольным, плести их очень легко🛐 #моиработы
❤1💘1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dyuchessbeads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
выберите 🙏🏻
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dyuchessbeads named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒅𝒚𝒖𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒔 🧁ˎˊ˗” (@dyuchessbeads), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dyuchessbeads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.