🔸Читайте наш канал, который работает и без Сети — max.ru/e1
🔸Пишите нам в @e1novosti
🔸Афиша — @e1_afisha
🔸Вакансии — @poisk_ekat
🔸По рекламе — @e1_pr
Регистрация в РКН: https://rkn.link/UCG
Created
21 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “E1.RU News” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net +3,487. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 424,117–431,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 10:27
428,488
-44
6 Nov 2026, 13:06
428,532
+25
5 Nov 2026, 10:37
428,507
-36
4 Nov 2026, 08:14
428,543
-81
3 Nov 2026, 05:50
428,624
-129
2 Nov 2026, 06:39
428,753
-76
1 Nov 2026, 02:55
428,829
-86
31 Oct 2026, 05:10
428,915
-83
30 Oct 2026, 07:05
428,998
-114
29 Oct 2026, 10:09
429,112
-93
28 Oct 2026, 09:31
429,205
-147
27 Oct 2026, 06:50
429,352
-109
26 Oct 2026, 07:20
429,461
-163
25 Oct 2026, 05:18
429,624
-18
24 Oct 2026, 05:35
429,642
+12
23 Oct 2026, 02:57
429,630
-81
22 Oct 2026, 05:17
429,711
-142
21 Oct 2026, 00:01
429,853
-94
19 Oct 2026, 22:49
429,947
-80
18 Oct 2026, 23:36
430,027
first reading
Engagement
1,997 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.45%
avg views ÷ 428,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,800
628 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
644
of 1,997 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 627 of 628 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
1,997 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
9,275,898
Reactions total
101,084
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈162,000
Videos
≈27,900
Links
≈83,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 27m
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 231 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
170,781 reactions across 973 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
30,135
17.6%
❤
23,009
13.5%
👍
16,243
9.51%
🤬
13,417
7.86%
👎
9,764
5.72%
🤣
8,547
5.00%
😱
8,335
4.88%
😢
7,411
4.34%
😭
7,388
4.33%
🔥
7,115
4.17%
🙏
5,220
3.06%
😁
5,175
3.03%
💊
4,224
2.47%
🤯
3,200
1.87%
🗿
2,489
1.46%
🕊
2,389
1.40%
😡
2,371
1.39%
👀
1,775
1.04%
💔
1,612
0.944%
☃
1,596
0.935%
41 further kinds
9,366
5.48%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 975 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170,781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 976 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @e1_news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.30%
33 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
33
posts carrying an erid · 33 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
18,300
over 33 measured posts
Median views · rest
16,000
over 943 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjbwJ6mR
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
2SDnjc1HRBA
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
2SDnjc1mjFy
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
2SDnjc2ks2b
1
8 October 2026
8 October 2026
2SDnjc31cmh
1
28 September 2026
28 September 2026
2SDnjc95XuE
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2SDnjcDaJ9H
1
6 October 2026
6 October 2026
2SDnjcG1uqE
1
22 October 2026
22 October 2026
2SDnjcHVGCt
1
6 November 2026
6 November 2026
2SDnjcJ7dPZ
1
4 October 2026
4 October 2026
2SDnjcN2MXR
1
9 October 2026
9 October 2026
2SDnjcr2MYX
1
25 September 2026
25 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 21 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 103 of 644 posts held from the last 30 days (16.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Пытался выдавить глаз и начал душить»
В Екатеринбурге бывшая возлюбленная обвинила студента из Ирака Джафара Канаана в избиении и преследовании. Осенью 2023 года девушка поставила точку в их отношениях.
Тогда молодой человек стал угрожать, что сольет ее интимные фотографии, если она не вернется к нему. Когда она придала истории огласку, иностранца задержали силовики.
Сейчас материалы уголовного дела направили в с…
Дело близится к новому году и, кажется, нас всех ждет ожидаемый взлет цен...
Многие и так отказывают себе в удовольствии лишний раз купить вкусненького, куда-нибудь сходить или съездить. А что будет дальше?
В комментариях расскажите, что раньше вы делали или покупали часто, а сейчас из-за цены перестали.
#вопросыЕ1
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайтесь!
😅Коллеги, признавайтесь, кто смотрит не только в монитор, но и украдкой на соседний стол?
Говорят, что плохая идея заводить отношения на работе. Но герой нашей книжной подборки об этом явно не слышали. Собрали романы, в которых планёрка плавно перетекает в свидание. Сохраняйте! 🩷
Подписаться на @poisk_ekat
Рожаешь — квартиру получаешь!
В Свердловской области будут платить за аренду жилья молодым семьям и отговаривать женщин от абортов, чтобы повысить рождаемость.
Власти региона утвердили новую большую программу, на которую будут тратить по 10 миллиардов рублей в год. Как вам идея?
🔥 — крутая
👀 — хорошая попытка, но нет
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайтесь!
🔞 Порноактер из Екатеринбурга стал секс-символом соцсетей
26-летний Семен Герасимов, известный под псевдонимом Сэм Гаро, завирусился в соцсетях. Его ролики набирают миллионы просмотров, а одно из видео с приездом на Mercedes посмотрели больше шести миллионов раз.
Девушки признаются, что сначала обратили внимание на внешность парня, а уже потом узнали, кем он работает. Сам актер рассказал, как пришел в индустрию, ка…
Как удержать отток программистов за границу? Теперь уже никак, если IT-ипотеку отменят.
Да и не нужно, считает экономист Всеволод Спивак, называя причиной решения не только ограниченный бюджет страны, но и развитие ИИ.
Вчера программистов называли людьми с профессией будущего: высокие зарплаты, завидные предложения от работодателей и возможность купить собственную квартиру на льготных условиях.
Сегодня власти обсу…
Несмотря на постоянные задержки и отмены рейсов в аэропортах, россияне не стали реже путешествовать, вот только география их полетов изменилась.
О трендах в туризме @e1_news рассказал PR-менеджер Aviasales компании Александр Медведев. А если хотите узнать, кто виноват, когда задерживают ваш рейс — смотрите ответ тут.
#МедиафорумЕ1
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайтесь!
Если хочется сбежать из города, но тратить полдня на дорогу не хочется — присмотритесь к Ельчёвошной. Небольшая скала с чудесным видом. Отличное место, где приятно встречать рассвет, сидя на тропе с чашечкой кофе. Подъём очень лёгкий, на развилке есть указатель, так что не заблудиться.
Кадры из небольшого путешествия в группе «Моя провинция — Урал» опубликовал Виталий Дубов.
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайт…
Леша Свик столкнулся лицом к лицу с певицей Ёлкой на шоу «Битва поколений. Новый вызов». Для выступления артист выбрал легендарную композицию своей соперницы «Город обмана».
Судя по кадрам, которые певец опубликовал в личных соцсетях, он исполнил хит в новой аранжировке. Во время выступления артист вызвал бурную реакцию звёздного жюри и самой Ёлки.
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайтесь!
⚡️Важная стоматология на Химмаше оказалась на грани закрытия из-за долгов
Она столкнулась с финансовыми трудностями после того, как мэрия подняла ей плату за аренду помещения. Начались суды. Рассказываем тут позиции двух сторон и к чему может привести конфликт.
🔛 Здесь мы всегда на связи. Подписывайтесь!
Стала автохамом не по своей воле
Екатеринбурженка Мария в конце сентября припарковалась возле «Тихвина» и честно оплатила парковку в ближайшем паркомате, так как покупала новый телефон и не смогла бы заплатить в приложении.
Изначально Мария внесла 125 рублей за два с половиной часа стоянки, но этого времени ей не хватило, и она внесла еще два платежа. Ее Lada простояла возле «Тихвина» с 15:32 примерно до 20 часов. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,997 posts we hold for @e1_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 308%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 81 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 151 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@e1_news named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@mediaforum_e1 named in 3 posts, 15 October 2026 – 20 October 2026 · confirmed gone 21 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
E1.RU | Афиша | Куда сходить в Екатеринбурге @e1_afisha · 94,563#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мой Екатеринбург @ekat_my · 20,900 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
Моменты Екатеринбург @momenty_ekb · 25,985 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Короче, Екатеринбург @ekbkoroche · 27,730 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Екатеринбург №1 @ekat01 · 29,340 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
4 канал | Екатеринбург | Новости @ekb4tv · 31,070 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
8 район Верхняя Пышма, Среднеуральск @vpsity · 30,650 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 5 September 2026
Новости Шеремета 9½ @TauNewsEkb · 33,795 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
66.RU | Новости из Екатеринбурга @RU66RU · 34,007 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
Екатеринбург ЧП @chp_ekb · 34,442 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Жесть Екатеринбург @zhest_ekatt · 34,360 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Екатеринбург с огоньком @ekattop · 35,162 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Интересный Екатеринбург @inburg · 36,864 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Новости Екатеринбурга и Области @ekaterinburg_smi · 54,825 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Екатское Чтиво | URA.RU @EkatskoeChtivo · 57,797 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Екатеринбург live @yo_burg · 60,140 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Афиша Екатеринбурга | Новости @kudaekb · 75,524 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Инцидент Екатеринбург @incekb · 79,434 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
СВЕТ💡Екатеринбург @SvetEKB · 89,238 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
E1.RU | Афиша | Куда сходить в Екатеринбурге @e1_afisha · 94,563 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Zloy_ekb 18+ | Злой Екатеринбург @Zloy_ekb · 131,368 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Екатеринбург Online @EkatOnline · 22,909 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
Инцидент | Первоуральск @inc196 · 23,525 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 18 September 2026
ЕКАТ @incityekb · 24,399 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 September 2026
It's My City @itsmycity · 25,771 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E1.RU | Новости Екатеринбурга” (@e1_news), 428,488 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e1_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.