File, posted without a caption
π€6π4π₯4π€2

Channel
@ea_forexlab
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
7,767subscribers
+635 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001953906055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ea_forexlab |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ea_forexlab |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 7,767 | +81 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 7,686 | +106 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 7,580 | +45 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 7,535 | +39 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 7,496 | +22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 7,474 | +41 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 7,433 | +42 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 7,391 | +40 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 7,351 | +41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 7,310 | +42 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 7,268 | +32 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 7,236 | +30 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 7,206 | +51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 7,155 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 7,135 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 7,132 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,132 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
232 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π€ | 93 | 40.1% | |
| π | 60 | 25.9% | |
| π₯ | 51 | 22.0% | |
| π€ | 26 | 11.2% | |
| π | 2 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
π€6π4π₯4π€2
π€ EA name: Sentinel XAU π¦ Version: 1.2 π» Platform: MT5 (5833) π Vendor/Source: - π Strategy: Order grid β° Timeframe: m15 π Currency pairs: XAUUSD π Trading time: Around the clock β οΈ Attention: Recommended best VPS, BROker π Monitoring found: - β³ Test period: 2024.01.01 - 2026.05.25 π Tick Data Provider: MT5 (RannForex) π§ GMT: +2; DST: US Real spread: β Slippage: β π All EAs tests Database π§² Reduce trading costs witβ¦
π€6π€4π3π₯1
ForexLAB Rebate keeps growing β ForexLAB Rebate is now listed on Myfxbook and Trustpilot, after completing the required review and verification steps. Another important step toward making our service more transparent, established and easier to evaluate independently. See how ForexLab Rebate can reduce your trading costs: https://rebate.ea-forexlab.com/
π₯6π5π€4
File, posted without a caption
π€7π₯4π3π€1
βπ Bad tests πβ __ π€ EA name: 1) Apex Gold Algo 2.0 2) Forex Fury 3) Goldwave EA MT5_2.35 Friends, we want to show you a great example of the importance of testing algorithms on the highest quality tick data using real spread. π» Platform: MT5 β οΈ Attention: Recommended best VPS, BROker π Tick Data Provider: RannForex (MT5) π§ GMT: +2; DST: US Real spread: β Slippage: β π All EAs tests EA ForexLab
π€8π€3π2π₯1
π€ EA name: Sharkyra Gold π¦ Version: 1.1 π» Platform: MT5 (5833) π Vendor/Source: MQL5 π Strategy: Scalping β° Timeframe: m5 π Currency pairs: XAUUSD π Trading time: Daytime trading session β οΈ Attention: Recommended best VPS, BROker π Monitoring found: MQL5 β³ Test period: 2024.01.01 - 2026.07.20 π Tick Data Provider: MT5 (RannForex) π§ GMT: +2; DST: US Real spread: β Slippage: β π All EAs tests Database π§² Reduce tradinβ¦
π€6π5π€4π₯1
File, posted without a caption
π€9π4π₯4π€1
If you've already seen our rebate service but haven't signed up yet, what stopped you? Please choose the main reason. Your answers will help us understand what we need to improve. π·πΊ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
File, posted without a caption
π6π₯4π€3π€1
π€ EA name: TwisterPro Scalper π¦ Version: 1.9 π» Platform: MT5 (5833) π Vendor/Source: MQL5 π Strategy: Pairs trading β° Timeframe: m1 π Currency pairs: EURUSD, XAUUSD π Trading time: Around the clock β οΈ Attention: Recommended best VPS, BROker π Monitoring found: MQL5 β³ Test period: 2024.01.01 - 2026.07.20 π Tick Data Provider: MT5 (RannForex) π§ GMT: +2; DST: US Real spread: β Slippage: β π All EAs tests Database π§² Reβ¦
π€8π5π₯4π€1
File, posted without a caption
π€10π₯3π€3π2
π Vendor backtest vs independent real-tick test: a radically different result Scalping Robot Pro MT5 has over 100 reviews on MQL5 and an almost flawless vendor backtest. Our independent real-tick test showed the opposite: π» Maximum drawdown: 79% π» Profit Factor: 0.60 π» Average win: $0.77 π» Average loss: β$1.65 π» Trades: 2,627 Many buyers reviewed the EA after only a few profitable hours or days β before the main β¦
π€6π5π€5π₯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ea_forexlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If you've already seen our rebate service but haven't signed up yet, what stopped you? Please choose the main reason. Your answers will help us understand what we need to improve. π·πΊ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βFree EA Forex LAB π€β (@ea_forexlab), 7,767 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ea_forexlab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.