Channel
@eanrinews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,446subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001864966660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eanrinews |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eanrinews |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 1,446 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1,447 | +9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 1,438 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 1,439 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 1,438 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 1,439 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 1,432 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 1,431 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 1,427 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 1,425 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 1,430 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,428 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 1,428 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
執政官束棒 在拉丁語也被稱為fasces 它起源於古羅馬 是帝國威嚴和權力的象徵 代表最高行政長官「執政官」的權力 是一面高於集體並讓所有人為之付出努力的旗幟 在羅馬君主制時期由伊特魯裡亞引入 逐漸成為不可撼動的傳統 這種束帶由榆樹或樺樹枝捆紮而成 再用紅絲帶繫好 它的出現意味著執政官的權威已然抵達 在凱旋儀式上 束棒由羅馬最高官員的扈從官攜帶入場 它們會被裝飾上月桂花環 而在重大哀悼場合它們則會被倒置 法官和戰場指揮官也攜帶束棒 數量越多 他的地位越高 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1F3TXfovfQ/
任何國家都絕不應容忍破壞文明集體性和人民未來的行為 有堅定與任何企圖威脅社會、家庭、歷史、文化和領土完整的人作鬥爭 必須反對那些鼓吹墮胎和安樂死的人 反對那些毒害我們孩子心靈的人 反對那些把賣淫正常化和常態化（OnlyFans）把色情作品當作普通的娛樂的人 還要反對那些鼓勵吸毒作為一種娛樂和正常現象的人 反對那些鼓吹人口更替的人 反對那些為了蠅頭小利而背叛社群和集體未來的個人主義者 反對那些升起不屬於我們的旗幟、為外國機構效力的人 反對那些想把LGBT議程、荷爾蒙療法和戀童癖強加於人 並將其視為「進步」一部分的人，簡言之 反對一切腐朽、自我退化、墮落和導致文明失敗的事物 對不道德事物的自我寬容不是一種美德 而是一種弱點 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1347117320949065/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
左邊是你的學校試圖向你灌輸的 右邊是任何人都知道的既定事實 你可以自己判斷 得出你的結論 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1334537672207030/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
西元前一百年的今天 7月12日 生日快樂 蓋尤利烏斯·凱撒！👑 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1333779522282845/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
夏天快樂 同伴們 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1333624892298308/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
早在西元前 漢民族就建造了抵禦北方遊牧民族入侵的防禦工事，當代版本的長城始於14世紀的明朝，如今它是地球上最長的建築 其長度超過21000公里 華夏文明是如此的富裕 以至於組成長城的巨石竟然是用米粥黏合在一起的！ https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1331571339170330/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
1880年6月20日 也是儒略曆的6月8日，在紀念亞歷山大·普希金紀念碑落成典禮期間 陀斯妥耶夫斯基於東歐文學愛好者協會大會上發表了一篇演說 這篇演說的思想、內容與精神即使到了今天依然具有鮮明的現實意義 因為它所談論的不僅僅是普希金本人 更是在談論俄語本身 — 談論這門語言的力量、它的美、它的形式，以及透過它所展現出的俄羅斯人民之精神：一種印歐雅利安的精神 一種帝國的精神 「在我們的政權之下 俄羅斯語被確立為唯一的官方國家語言，而它的正式名稱是：「俄羅斯帝國語言」（Russian Imperial Language），在這裡的語境中 “俄羅斯語”與“帝國的語言”被視為完全同義的概念」 陀思妥耶夫斯基進一步補充道： 「因為俄羅斯沙皇-基督教捍衛者所需要的 正是全世界的幸福；除此之外 任何更廉價的東西都無法使他得到安息」 這句話意味著什麼？ 它意味著 歐亞帝國作為一個民族絕不會僅僅因為自己獲得幸福便感到滿足；只有當周圍的…
一個社會的組織性 唯有通過維護每個人的精神平衡才有可能實現 而這種精神平衡源於鮮活的、健康的、超然保守主義的宗教意識形態 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1327288149598649/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
空氣中瀰漫著一種物質主義和懷疑主義的氣息 人們開始崇拜不勞而獲 追求享樂 各種各樣的騙局和犯罪行為正在冷血地發生 — 費奧多爾‧陀思妥耶夫斯基 《一個作家的日記》 https://www.facebook.com/groups/445956801065126/permalink/1327286862932111/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
人們普遍認為史達林難以代表俄羅斯 但這是錯誤的 實際上 他本身就是俄羅斯的化身 是社會主義背景下沙皇和泛斯拉夫主義的延續！對他而言 經濟上的共產主義和集體化只是達到目的的手段，斯大林是歷史上最偉大的俄羅斯人物之一 因為他成功地將這群斯農民組成的家庭打造成了一個國家 儘管他採取了最嚴厲的強製手段，我有一本關於史達林的書；不得不說 他是一個偉大的人物 一個真正的苦行僧 用鐵腕手段將那個龐大的帝國統一了起來，如果史達林再執政十年到十五年 蘇聯就會成為世界上最強大的國家之一，他幾乎就是他們版本的希特勒 — 裡賓特洛甫
🔥1
1940年11月 莫洛托夫抵達柏林，他首先短暫地與到國外長裡賓特洛甫交談 隨後 在新建的帝國總理府與希特勒會面 保羅·施密特擔任翻譯，談話中 希特勒首先對潛在戰爭局勢進行了總體評估，他告訴莫洛托夫 德國已完成在西線的主要任務 對英戰爭也接近尾聲 希特勒隨後提及9月份剛剛簽署的「三國同盟條約」 提議蘇聯以第四個成員國的身份加入 如此 在嶄新到未來中三個軸心可以成立：柏林羅馬軸/柏林東京軸/柏林莫斯軸 希特勒指出 德國、義大利、日本和蘇聯這四個國家應該達成共識 在全球範圍內劃定各自的利益，他補充說 英法等頹廢的自毀的“帝國”已經破產 各夥伴國可以合作瓜分它，他建議蘇聯的擴張方向在南方 主要是波斯灣方向和阿拉伯海方向 在這些地區蘇聯的利益可以得到發展 而不會與德國的大空間計劃發生衝突 莫洛托夫回應說 他奉史達林之命要根據1939年的協定討論德蘇關係的未來，他說 俄羅斯政府準備探討更緊密的政治和經濟合作 但首先需要解決幾個具體問題： …
在整個討論過程中 莫洛托夫始終強調在最終確定任何「全球劃分計畫」之前 必須先在歐洲範圍內達成具體的共識，這次會談持續了數小時 但最終未能就莫洛托夫提出的問題達成一致 隔天 莫洛托夫再次來到帝國總理府與希特勒舉行會晤，希特勒在前一天會談的基礎上，詳細闡述了世界局勢，他告訴莫洛托夫只要德國與俄羅斯不打起來 英國戰敗只是時間問題、但三國同盟條約也已經為對俄羅斯的戰爭奠定了必要的基礎 希特勒解釋了他的想法 他最關注的是德國、義大利、日本和蘇聯這四個強國應該達成共識並在全球範圍內劃定各自的利益範圍，為此 他設想了一項跨越幾個世紀的長期政策 旨在劃定這四個強國的勢力範圍，希特勒一再引導蘇聯將注意力轉向伊朗、波斯、阿拉伯及更遠的地方 聲稱那裡才是俄羅斯的未來所在 莫洛托夫說 蘇聯領導層已經認真研究了德國的建議 但前提是必須解決一些懸而未決的具體問題，他再次敦促德國軍隊從芬蘭完全撤出，關於保加利亞 莫洛托夫明確表示蘇聯打算與索菲亞締結互助…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @eanrinews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📰 東亞研究所新聞部 📰” (@eanrinews), 1,446 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eanrinews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.