Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for juke's alte welt

Channel

juke's alte welt

@earlundjuke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,139subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001155252983
TypeChannel
Username@earlundjuke
CreatedBetween 1 February 2019 and 30 September 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/earlundjuke

Growth

2,1392,1612,1507 August 2026 — 2,161 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,160 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,158 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,155 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,153 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,152 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,148 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,144 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,139 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,136–2,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 01:592,139-5
2 Sept 2026, 23:562,144-4
31 Aug 2026, 02:162,148-4
24 Aug 2026, 20:252,152-1
21 Aug 2026, 04:342,153-2
17 Aug 2026, 19:232,155+2
14 Aug 2026, 06:382,153-5
10 Aug 2026, 19:352,158-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:582,160-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:452,161no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:332,161first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 41s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1544.1%
❤‍🔥617.6%
👏411.8%
🏆25.88%
😱25.88%
🤝25.88%
12.94%
👌12.94%
🤡12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀 Das alte Danzig Einst Hauptstadt der preußischen Provinz Westpreußen, bis es uns durch Lügen und Betrug genommen wurde. Eine kurzer Reise in die Vergangenheit durch Straßen, Bauwerke und Erinnerungen dieser geschichtsträchtigen Hansestadt.

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC183 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀 18. Jahrhundert: Italienischer Tresor mit drei Schlüsseln, zwei Geheimfächern und einem Löwenmaul. Denn schon damals wusste man: Was wertvoll ist, bedarf zu seinem Schutz des Rituals, der Geheimhaltung und der Stärke. Heute speichern die Leute alles in der Cloud – mit dem Passwort „1234“ – und nennen das Evolution.

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC157 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀 Hat Plasma eine Rasse von Riesen versteinert und sie in der Landschaft begraben❓ Erhöhe die Auflösung, dann wirst du es sehen. Sie waren die ganze Zeit direkt vor aller Augen verborgen.

7 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC154 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀 Sie versuchten, sich vor dem großen Ereignis zu verstecken. Sie scheiterten. Dann erzählen sie dir, es sei eine Skulptur gewesen. Angefertigt von irgendeinem Taugenichts mit einem Meißel.

7 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

😳bin gerade darüber gestolpert❗️ Würdest du sagen, das sind echte Eier? Vielleicht sind sie zu lange gebraten — aber ich habe noch nie Eier gesehen, die sich so weit dehnen lassen, dass man sie nicht mehr auseinanderreißen kann. Wie dem auch sei: Es werden mittlerweile massenhaft künstliche Eier produziert. Genauso wie wir Fleisch aus dem Labor und 3D-gedrucktes Steak haben — es ist der reine Wahnsinn.

7 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👀 Bewegen wir uns wirklich in die richtige Richtung? Oder gab es früher tatsächlich mehr echte Erfindungen❓️ Sind wir dümmer geworden — oder wurden wir dumm gemacht und werden es weiter? Teile das Video mit jemandem, der ständig vom «Fortschritt» redet. Sie bauen Geräte, die ihnen helfen, uns zu steuern — nicht Geräte, die uns helfen, besser, fröhlicher und sicherer zu leben.

6 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC216 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎼Street Music🎼 📌auf sowas musste erst mal kommen. . .

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @earlundjuke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“juke's alte welt” (@earlundjuke), 2,139 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/earlundjuke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.