"조세형평성을 상실한 징벌적 가상자산 과세 유예 및 재검토 요청에 관한 청원" https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/562B57D0D2076F1DE064ECE7A7064E8B
Signed Eastgooner

Channel
@eastgoonercrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,390subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001707333905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eastgoonercrypto |
| Created | 7 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eastgoonercrypto |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 2,390 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 2,411 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 2,414 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 2,415 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:34 | 2,422 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 2,431 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 2,438 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 2,431 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 2,439 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 2,437 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 2,440 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 2,450 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 2,450 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"조세형평성을 상실한 징벌적 가상자산 과세 유예 및 재검토 요청에 관한 청원" https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/562B57D0D2076F1DE064ECE7A7064E8B
Signed Eastgooner
絶縁 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVfhY6ZDoTA 인트로를 존나 신기하네 만들었네
Signed Eastgooner
Everygoodbyedrivesmeinsane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQoCha6ljnA fucking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s11ZauPvxg *ai
Signed Eastgooner
시그널 믿고 전재산 다 쳐박을걸.. 공포 전염되서 천천히 사야된다는 생각에 비중도 많이 못싣고, 빠르게빠르게 덜어내버렸네요. 그래도 큰 변동성에 시그널의 승률 데이터가 계속 쌓이는건 고무적입니다.
Signed Eastgooner
두 종목 모두 큰 반등으로 시그널 off, 과매도 오실레이터 off 다음주 일봉 5개가 약세종목으로 전환되느냐, 한번 더 강세종목의 모습을 보여주느냐의 기로.
Signed Eastgooner
우리가 흔하게 보던 코인판 작전 월가 버전
Signed Eastgooner
1) 약세 종목 2) 강세 종목 전닉은 2) -> 1) 로 넘어가는 기로에 서있음. 어떤 트리거로 지표를 해소하지 못하면 마치 최고점을 찍은 비트처럼 간헐적 반등만 주면서 흐를수도 있다는거.... 전닉 호재 뭐 없나요?
Signed Eastgooner
KOSPI 코스피: 24년 여름 이후 그저께 첫 과매도 시그널 삼성전자: 24년 겨울 이후 어제 첫 과매도 시그널 SK하이닉스: 24년 가을 이후 어제 첫 과매도 시그널 그 변곡의 자리라는 뜻인듯.
Signed Eastgooner
https://m.blog.naver.com/highk27/224361610793
Signed Eastgooner
개미투자자도 개미투자자인데 원칙 어겨가면서까지 국장 비중 늘린 연기금은 얼마 날린거지..?
🤯1
Signed Eastgooner
KOSPI 25년 4월부터 2주전까지 무한으로 살려주던 장기추세선을 갭락으로 깨고 내려감.
❤2
Signed Eastgooner
쿠팡 + 우리은행 한국 최초로 KRW 스테이블코인 결제를 엔드 투 엔드로 도입. 쿠팡이츠에서 고객 결제부터 온체인 정산을 통해 판매자에게 전달되고, 은행 계좌 연계를 통해 환전이 이루어지는 과정 시연. https://x.com/tempo/status/2081776146413457706?s=20
Signed Eastgooner
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @eastgoonercrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eastgooner Altcoin” (@eastgoonercrypto), 2,390 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eastgoonercrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.