Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شیتینگ!

Channel

شیتینگ!

@eatingshitt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

95,619subscribers

+16,115 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762944128
TypeChannel
Username@eatingshitt
Descriptionیکم شل کن؛ و بخند.🤎 @adeshiting
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eatingshitt

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

76,38795,61986,0037 August 2026 — 79,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 79,365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 79,101 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78,852 subscribers10 August 2026 — 78,610 subscribers11 August 2026 — 78,375 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,189 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,963 subscribers15 August 2026 — 77,632 subscribers17 August 2026 — 77,347 subscribers18 August 2026 — 77,149 subscribers19 August 2026 — 76,977 subscribers20 August 2026 — 76,781 subscribers21 August 2026 — 76,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 76,387 subscribers24 August 2026 — 77,384 subscribers25 August 2026 — 77,998 subscribers26 August 2026 — 80,120 subscribers27 August 2026 — 81,676 subscribers28 August 2026 — 83,228 subscribers29 August 2026 — 84,685 subscribers30 August 2026 — 85,879 subscribers31 August 2026 — 86,926 subscribers1 September 2026 — 87,690 subscribers2 September 2026 — 88,509 subscribers3 September 2026 — 89,357 subscribers5 September 2026 — 90,801 subscribers8 September 2026 — 92,200 subscribers11 September 2026 — 95,097 subscribers13 September 2026 — 95,511 subscribers14 September 2026 — 95,475 subscribers16 September 2026 — 95,258 subscribers19 September 2026 — 95,619 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +16,115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,502–98,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:2095,619+361
16 Sept 2026, 18:2295,258-217
14 Sept 2026, 23:3795,475-36
13 Sept 2026, 08:5695,511+414
11 Sept 2026, 11:1995,097+2,897
8 Sept 2026, 15:4192,200+1,399
5 Sept 2026, 10:2290,801+1,444
3 Sept 2026, 11:3789,357+848
2 Sept 2026, 09:0388,509+819
1 Sept 2026, 06:4687,690+764
31 Aug 2026, 08:3586,926+1,047
30 Aug 2026, 07:0685,879+1,194
29 Aug 2026, 09:0484,685+1,457
28 Aug 2026, 05:3483,228+1,552
27 Aug 2026, 06:0481,676+1,556
26 Aug 2026, 05:5380,120+2,122
25 Aug 2026, 06:4277,998+614
24 Aug 2026, 03:1477,384+997
22 Aug 2026, 14:1176,387-190
21 Aug 2026, 07:0276,577first reading

Engagement

762 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.30%
avg views ÷ 95,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,150
448 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
448
of 762 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 417 of 448 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held762 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total1,412,671
Reactions total36,155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈132
Links
≈78

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

58,606 reactions across 696 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24,60142.0%
🤣21,00635.8%
❤5,4019.22%
💔4,6898.00%
😢1,4872.54%
😐8381.43%
👎5840.996%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 709 of the 762 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 762 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 761 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eatingshitt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 762 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC400 views32 reactionsread 25 September 2026

بیاید آنفالو کردن ادمایی که باهاشون ارتباطی نداریم رو عادی سازی کنیم

👍32

25 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC991 views59 reactionsread 25 September 2026

دانشگاه راه‌دور باعث میشه راننده اتوبوس موردعلاقه داشته باشی.

👍40🤣18❤1

25 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,200 views1 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Poll

شده کسی رو مسخره کنید بعدش عذاب وجدان بگیرید؟

  1. دخترم، آره پیش اومده خیلی بدعه56%
  2. دخترم، نه به تخمک هامم نبوده هیچ وقت10%
  3. دخترم، اصلا تا حالا کسیو مسخره نکردم18%
  4. پسرم، آره هم بگا دادم هم بگا رفتم با عذاب وجدان6%
  5. پسرم، نه به کیرمم نبوده5%
  6. پسرم، اصلا کسیو تا حالا مسخره نکردم5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤1

25 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

❤️ Turkiye - 🇫🇷 France ⏰ Tonight 22:15 🏟 Kocaeli Stadyumu 🇪🇺 ترکیه با تکیه بر میزبانی و بازی مستقیم، احتمالاً فشار بیشتری روی فرانسه وارد می‌کند، اما فرانسه از نظر کیفیت فردی و عمق ترکیب دست بالاتری دارد. در چنین تقابلی، کنترل میانه زمین و انتقال‌های سریع می‌تواند تعیین‌کننده باشد؛ ترکیه روی حملات گذار و فرانسه روی مالکیت و خلق موقعیت حساب می‌کنند. از نظر آماری، سناریوی بازی نزدیک با موقعیت‌های دو طرف محتمل‌تر اس…

25 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,160 views42 reactionsread 25 September 2026

دختر خوشگلا روانی نیستن، روانیشون کردن.

👍42

25 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,420 views38 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

خیلی دقیق بود افرین @Eatingshitt | !شیتینگ

❤22👍10👎6

25 Sept 2026, 06:54 UTC≈1,590 views55 reactionsread 25 September 2026

قیمت لباس پاییزه ها رو دیدین؟ اعصاب مصابتون سر جاشه؟

💔49👎6

24 Sept 2026, 21:17 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

❤️ ITALY - ❤️ BELGIUM ⏰ Tonight 22:15 🏟 Stadio Olimpico 🇪🇺 ایتالیا با بازگشت مانچینی و ترکیبی جوان‌تر، بازی را احتمالاً با مالکیت و فشار از کناره‌ها شروع می‌کند. بلژیک با حضور بازیکنانی مثل دی‌بروینه همچنان در انتقال سریع خطرناک است، اما غیبت تروسار، دوکو و کورتوا روی کیفیت ترکیب اثر دارد. آخرین تقابل رسمی دو تیم با برتری ۱–۰ ایتالیا تمام شد و تقابل قبل‌تر هم ۲–۲ بود؛ بنابراین بازی‌های اخیرشان نزدیک بوده است. نقط…

24 Sept 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,330 views72 reactionsread 25 September 2026

‏در بلند مدت چیزی که از تورم بدتره این هستش که تمام تمرکزمون رو از خلاقیت، یادگیری، رشد، عشق و زندگی برداشتیم و گذاشتیم روی "بقا"

❤46👍25💔1

24 Sept 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,630 views68 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

حیف شدیم @Eatingshitt | !شیتینگ

😢56❤8🤣4

24 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,850 views99 reactionsread 25 September 2026

شما که غریبه نیستین ؛ ریدم با این مدل زندگی و جوونی کردنم.

👍90💔8❤1

24 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC≈3,000 views108 reactionsread 25 September 2026

بدى سینگل بودن واسه مدت طولانى اينه كه استانداردات هى شديدتر ميشن تازگیا دنبال يه نفرم كه بتونه پرواز كنه.

🤣103👍4😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 762 posts we hold for @eatingshitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Poll380 voters

شده کسی رو مسخره کنید بعدش عذاب وجدان بگیرید؟

  1. دخترم، آره پیش اومده خیلی بدعه56%
  2. دخترم، نه به تخمک هامم نبوده هیچ وقت10%
  3. دخترم، اصلا تا حالا کسیو مسخره نکردم18%
  4. پسرم، آره هم بگا دادم هم بگا رفتم با عذاب وجدان6%
  5. پسرم، نه به کیرمم نبوده5%
  6. پسرم، اصلا کسیو تا حالا مسخره نکردم5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Poll751 voters

به نظرتون کدوم درسته؟

  1. عشق فقط یکبار اتفاق میوفته20%
  2. میشه چندبار عاشق شد با توجه به بزرگ شدن و پختگی50%
  3. عشق وجود نداره29%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTCAnonymous Poll737 voters

بیشتر به کدوم اهمیت میدین؟

  1. استایل26%
  2. پوست و مو16%
  3. برنامه زندگیم29%
  4. شغلم11%
  5. درسم18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Sept 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Poll896 voters

تا حالا به کسی که زن یا شوهر داره، چشم داشتین؟!

  1. دخترم، آره11%
  2. دخترم، نه73%
  3. پسرم، آره6%
  4. پسرم، نه10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll960 voters

تا چه حد خودتون رو روشنفکر میدونید؟

  1. دخترم، زیاد9%
  2. دخترم، متوسط58%
  3. دخترم، کم15%
  4. دخترم، اصلا نیستم4%
  5. پسرم، زیاد3%
  6. پسرم، متوسط7%
  7. پسرم، کم2%
  8. پسرم، اصلا نیستم2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTCAnonymous Poll549 voters

تا به حال در جمع خانواده سوتی +18 دادین؟ (در کامنت ها تعریف کنید)

  1. دخترم، آره35%
  2. دخترم، نه46%
  3. پسرم، آره9%
  4. پسرم، نه9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 762 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377
#1
رادیوکصشر
@Radiokocsher · 966,334
#2
دیاستومی
@kianaafr · 401,542
#3
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 782,246
#4
Comentive | کامنتیو
@Comentive · 203,579
#5
Commentiat | کامنتیات
@Comentiat · 382,621
#6
『 گایشگا 』
@Gayeeshga · 109,910
#7
جوانان ایران
@ir_javan · 635,785
#8
باشه ولی"
@OKBUT · 112,594
#9
پارس توییت
@ParsTwt · 502,853
#10
Un Normal
@UnNurmal · 537,416
#11
دلدار.
@Deldar_org · 27,583
#12
کامنت ملت
@CommentMelat · 269,531
#13
Parsa
@par3a_xe · 212
#14
کسینوس
@kosinuse · 179,455
#15
” گا
@GaArea · 51,827
#16
اختـــــــــاپــــوس
@okhtapooous · 1,151,599
#17
BSD | سگـ‌های ولگرد بانگو
@MrSoukoku · 8,009
#18
توییتولی | Tweetuli
@tweetuli · 99,874
#19
پارانوئید خفیف
@Xcole · 39,866
#20
شاعر کسشر
@iShaerr · 252,481
#21
مِزآح گو
@MezahGo · 16,961
#22
رک وایبز
@itmadness · 1,118
#23
فیریکات•
@firiicut · 119,020 (as read 13 September 2026)
#24
مینیون
@MinionShot · 44,066
#25
MovieTwitte | مووی توییت
@MovieTwitte · 46,396
#26
اخبار جنگ i'm Sad
@IrJaavan · 234,052
#27
BadNews85 | بدنیوز
@BadNews_85 · 228,940
#28
حرفایی ک کاش میزدم.
@liwish · 176,154
#29
دهه هشتادیا
@Dhei80 · 66,380 (as read 13 September 2026)
#30
توییت هایی که خوندم"
@trendstweet · 37,582
#31
تکست رپی [ Text Rapi ]
@texttrapi · 54,335
#32
⸸𝗙𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁
@FuckTwit · 172,531
#33
فكت شُخمی
@factshokhmi · 350,952
#34
بدتوییت | BadTwittez
@BadTwittez · 35,245
#35
Я А Ш Т В !
@rstbbi · 2,152
#36
دژاوو
@Dezhavuoo · 1,520 (as read 13 September 2026)
#37
Mood
@mood_listen · 72,980 (as read 13 September 2026)
#38
لاکتوس^
@LaktooS · 19,008
#39
𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙭𝙞𝙖🦋
@aydachnnl · 16,381
#40
فوبيا دارم
@phobiadarm · 14,506
#41
پاتریک
@Patrik_channell · 14,072
#42
توئیتیسم | 𝗧𝘄𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗲
@Tweetismee · 19,777
#43
"𝙁𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙖𝙤"
@Fuckoa · 6,060
#44
Commention | کامنت
@Commntion · 19,124
#45
Remind | ریمایند
@Remind_txt · 17,845
#46
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421
#47
رسانه افشا | اخبار جنگ
@EfshaKhabar · 274,371
#48
جهان موازی
@ParalWorld · 237,115
#49
دانشــ🎓ــجو
@Daneshjoo · 349,999
#50
Pinkplus⚡️
@piinkplus · 368
#51
Mental | اخبار فوری
@mental_news · 110,672
#52
سایت شرط بندی/ فرم پیشبینی فوتبال
@westbet2025 · 37,944
#53
Golden Play
@G0ldenPlay · 441
#54
آقای خبر
@sirnews2 · 374,660
#55
‌ ‌„اسـپـا تــوییـت.🍋‍🟩“
@AESPA_TWEET · 807
#56
هواداری | Havadari
@havadari_official · 2,606
#57
𝗬𝗲𝘀 𝗧𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻
@heavenchannll · 188 (as read 13 September 2026)
#58
Over
@OverthinkinTilldie · 185 (as read 13 September 2026)
#59
ثـُولِنزارآ
@solenzaram · 46,804
#60

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سایت شرط بندی/ فرم پیشبینی فوتبال
@westbet2025 · 37,944
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 13 September 2026
315 vpn | فیلترشکن
@vpnn_315 · 42,622
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شیتینگ!” (@eatingshitt), 95,619 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eatingshitt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.