8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 88β143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 07:57
137
+12
8 Sept 2026, 19:15
125
+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:53
124
+8
24 Aug 2026, 10:35
116
+7
16 Aug 2026, 14:26
109
+13
9 Aug 2026, 12:17
96
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:11
96
+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:19
94
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π₯
11
61.1%
β€
4
22.2%
π
2
11.1%
π€―
1
5.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Good night traders! π π€
What a day β what a week.
Today's Summary π
β Trade 1 β BUY 4290β4294
210 pips π°
β Trade 2 β BUY 4298β4302
130 pips π°
β NFP Trade β BUY 4316 (VIP)
440 pips π°
Total today: 780 pips π―π
Three trades. Three wins. NFP caught perfectly in VIP.
Enjoy your weekend team rest, reset, and we come back Monday stronger ππ½
See you next week. God bless π€
Closed most at 4360 β 440 pips π°π
This one was in VIP β left a small position still running.
If you want to join VIP DM me @ebbadebeli
What a Friday team ππ½π€
Fully out at 4311 π―
Trade 1: 210 pips β
Trade 2: 130 pips β
Total: 340 pips collected π°π
What a way to end the week team β well done to everyone ππ½.
300+ pips secured across both trades π°
Runners still going at 4309 β
Trade 1 sitting at 190 pips π
Trade 2 sitting at 110 pips π
Let them run team ππ½π€
Both trades full TP hit π―π―
Still holding a couple of runners β
let them go team ππ°π€
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ebbagoldtrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βEbba Gold Trading πͺπΉπ¦πͺβ (@ebbagoldtrading), 137 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebbagoldtrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.