Channel
@ebokataya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
168subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002856072193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ebokataya |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ebokataya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 168 | +5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 163 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 159 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 157 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 156 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
87 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 39.1% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 32.2% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 8.05% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 Традиционный опрос: как там ваши отношения с MAX?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧚♀️ Это я раскрасила феечку винкс, будто она — это я. А это статья про то, как геймификация реально влияет на выручку (а не только лояльность к бренду). Крупняк уже давно понял пользу от геймификации. Давайте подтягиваться и внедрять игровые механики в свои проекты уже сейчас, чтобы потом не удивляться и не кусать локти, мол, как это так, не успели, не внедрили, не подумали, как это применить в своих проектах.
❤9🔥1
✨ Какую реальную пользу можно получить от участия в премии? ▪️Шильдик на сайт, кейс и в КП. Это самая простая мотивация: все любят шильдики. Это радостно и приятно, а главное — авторитетно. Если хотите шильдик, выбирайте премии с авторитетом в вашей сфере, чтобы авторитет премии бустил и ваш авторитет. Шильдик «плохой» премии, которая не пользуется уважением в нише, негативно отразится и на вашей репутации. ▪️Цитир…
❤5
Но я-то знаю, что дело не в плате. Девочки и мальчики, выбираем.
😁7
Я стала тратить деньги на поломки и болезни. Я хоч в Стамбл. Бог, я не тво самы сильны воин!!!
😁4❤1🕊1🥰1
...Это не дравера виноваты. Видимо, понадобится машинны хиррг.
😁2🥰1
Оказывается, чтобы хорошо работать, нжно не только работать, но и вовремя станавливать обновления, организовывать папочки и заниматься кче всего, что не относится к работе. Сиж снош винд, потом что вовремя не становила обновления, и теперь меня не работают некоторые бквы. гадате какие бквы меня не работают.))
😁11🥰1
13:51 — ведутся переговоры по предоставлению полного доступа к Телеграм 13:52 — ФСБ России может объявить Павла Дурова в международный розыск — ему предъявили обвинение по статье о содействии терроризму
🤡8😁4
А сколько ароматов в вашем парфюмерном гардеробе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🌸 Парфюм — «фишечка» вашего персонального кода, которая не должна меняться Так думают очень многие, и душатся одним ароматом в любую погоду и при любых обстоятельствах. По задумке — круто, узнаваемо, ассоциативный ряд запускается. А что на практике? Едете вы в машине в тридцатиградусную жару с партнерами, и от вас несет вашим любимым душащим шипром. Партнеры вешаются и думают “Господи, когда же это закончится. Над…
❤2👏1
А, и да. Я все же стала красной (особенно мой нос после того, как я обгорела на фестивале)
❤10
🥇🥈🥉 Как увеличить шансы выигрыша в премии/конкурсе/тендере/подставьте нужное? ▪️ Каждый кейс нужно адаптировать к заявке. Даже если у вас есть готовый материал, часто его приходится дополнять или пересобирать, чтобы попадать в критерии оценки конкретной премии. Это нудно, муторно и очевидно, но это важно. ▪️Изучите победителей и финалистов прошлых лет. Это поможет понять характер премии и то, что важно для оценочно…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ebokataya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌟 Традиционный опрос: как там ваши отношения с MAX?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А сколько ароматов в вашем парфюмерном гардеробе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что-то на Бокатом” (@ebokataya), 168 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebokataya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.