Channel
@ecashcom_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,184subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003731100782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ecashcom_official |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 13 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ecashcom_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 1,184 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 1,197 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1,208 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,219 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,223 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 1,219 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 1,231 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 1,240 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 1,253 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 1,275 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,285 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 1,285 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
If your BTC is on an exchange, whether you receive $ECX at the fork is entirely up to them. Coinbase holds ~970K BTC. Binance holds ~665K BTC. Every one of those users gets $ECX, but only if those exchanges decide to credit them. Vote for the exchange you want $ECX listed on. Every vote and email lands on that exchange’s desk. Refusing to credit BTC holders is a choice, and it’s one their users notice. Tell your e…
Paul Sztorc live now with Incrypted 👇 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1aKbddWboRRJX?s=20
Introducing Genesis Creator Week. $10,000 in $ECX in prizes. Create anything that helps people discover eCash - memes, videos, threads, infographics, animations - and submit before August 14th 00:00 CET. To enter: 1) Follow @BTCdrivechains on X 2) Quote-tweet the base post with your submission (https://x.com/BTCdrivechains/status/2082779488274862211?s=20) Top submissions share the prize pool 💰
"Bitcoin Builders Are Quitting" | The ECX Solution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uCbMENgEkc
https://x.com/btcdrivechains/status/2082418210129805724?s=46&t=VhPzVo_bNWugHONZRmjO3Q
Hard forks are less like starting over and more like branching a timeline. • Shared history • New consensus rules • Two independent networks
https://x.com/btcdrivechains/status/2081025636341030990?s=46&t=VhPzVo_bNWugHONZRmjO3Q
Most crypto projects raise a bunch of money then figure out what to build. We did it backwards. $3M seed in 2022 followed by four years of heads-down work. What came out the other side: a working mainchain with 7 live sidechains - payments, privacy, prediction markets, and more. All running on Bitcoin Signet today. Now we're bringing it to market. Round II closed at $5M earlier this year. Round III underway. ~30…
https://x.com/BTCdrivechains/status/2080271713527312415?s=20
Bear markets are wild. Watching people argue against receiving a free asset because it might dilute the price of the asset they already own. Bitcoin is healing.
Bitcoin & Chill https://x.com/i/spaces/1AGRnnkgjVXGl/peek
Bitcoin created a new financial system. eCash extends it with Drivechains, powered by BIP300/301. At block ~964,000, every Bitcoin address receives ECX 1:1. The fork does not move, modify, or touch your BTC in any way. Ignore it, sell it, or hold it. Your call.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ecashcom_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ecashcom_official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eCash Official” (@ecashcom_official), 1,184 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecashcom_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.