Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محتوى بيديا | ContentPedia

Channel

محتوى بيديا | ContentPedia

@ecoonee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,293subscribers

-290 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298070246
TypeChannel
Username@ecoonee
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ecoonee

Growth

11,29311,58411,438.57 August 2026 — 11,583 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,583 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,580 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,578 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,576 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,575 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,514 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,497 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,476 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,450 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,433 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,409 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,398 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,380 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,369 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,364 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,343 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,329 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,312 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,306 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,303 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,293 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -290. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,249–11,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 01:4411,293-10
2 Sept 2026, 02:0411,303-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:0711,306-6
31 Aug 2026, 02:5311,312-17
30 Aug 2026, 00:0511,329-14
28 Aug 2026, 22:2711,343-21
27 Aug 2026, 22:3411,364-5
26 Aug 2026, 23:3411,369-11
25 Aug 2026, 23:3311,380-18
25 Aug 2026, 03:0511,398-11
23 Aug 2026, 18:4511,409-24
22 Aug 2026, 03:3611,433-17
20 Aug 2026, 19:0211,450-8
19 Aug 2026, 18:0611,458-18
18 Aug 2026, 17:5811,476-21
17 Aug 2026, 17:1611,497-17
16 Aug 2026, 15:3511,514-61
14 Aug 2026, 20:5511,575-1
13 Aug 2026, 12:1511,576-2
12 Aug 2026, 14:4711,578first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 11,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
291
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held73 (25 June 202629 August 2026)
Views total14,858
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4986.0%
👍47.02%
👏47.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC234 viewsread 3 September 2026

تضيع نص يومك وأنت تدور معلومة دقيقة في قوقل وتغرق بين عشرات الروابط والإعلانات؟ هذا الأسلوب صار قديم ويستهلك جهدك عالفاضي. السر الحين في "محركات البحث المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي" (AI Search) مثل Perplexity أو SearchGPT. الفرق بينها وبين قوقل التقليدي أن الذكاء الاصطناعي ما يعطيك روابط ويخليك "أنت" تبحث داخلها، هو يروح يقرأ المحتوى بدالك، يفلتره، ويعطيك الإجابة الصافية مع ذكر المصادر عشان تتأكد. كيف تستفيد من البحث

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

28 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC190 viewsread 3 September 2026

تحسب إن ChatGPT بيعطيك محتوى "رهيب" بمجرد ما تطلب منه يكتب لك؟ الحقيقة إن أغلب اللي يكتبه الذكاء الاصطناعي حالياً ينعرف من أول سطر لأنه يفتقد لروحك وبصمتك الخاصة ويطلع بصيغة "بلاستيكية" مكررة. عشان تكسر هالحاجز وتخلي الـ AI يكتب بلسانك فعلاً، لازم تسوي حركة "هندسة النبرة" (Tone Engineering) بدل ما تعتمد على الأوامر العامة: 1. اجمع أفضل 5 منشورات كتبتها بنفسك سابقاً ونجحت مع جمهورك. 2. افتح محادثة جديدة وعطِ الـ AI

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

27 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC201 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تحسب إن الحل عشان تاخذ نتيجة خرافية من ChatGPT هو إنك تكتب برومبت (Prompt) طوله صفحة؟ الصدق إنك كذا تشتت الذكاء الاصطناعي وتخليه يضيع في التفاصيل ويهلوس. السر ما هو بطول النص، السر في "التدرج بالمعلومة" أو اللي نسميه Iterative Prompting. بدال ما ترمي كل أفكارك في رسالة وحدة وتتوقع منه يقرأ عقلك، جرب هذي الخطوات الثلاث في مهمتك الجاية: 1️⃣ حدد الشخصية (Role): قله "أنت كاتب محتوى إبداعي متخصص في كتابة الإعلانات"، كذ

1

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

27 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC196 viewsread 3 September 2026

تظن إن ChatGPT يحتاج "أوامر عبقرية" عشان يعطيك محتوى رهيب؟ الحقيقة إن المشكلة ماهي في "البرومبت"، المشكلة إنك تعامله كأنه غريب في كل مرة تدخل عليه وتضطر تشرح له كل شيء من الصفر! بدل ما تضيع وقتك وتكرر "أنا مسوق" أو "اكتب بلهجة سعودية" في كل طلب، استخدم ميزة (Custom Instructions) أو التعليمات المخصصة. هذي هي "الذاكرة" اللي تخلي الذكاء الاصطناعي موظف فاهم شغلك وعارف هويتك بدون ما تفتح فمك. كيف تبرمج "مخ" الذكاء الاصط

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

26 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC221 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تحسب إنك لو حطيت كلمات مفتاحية بمقالك خلاص بتطلع الأول في قوقل وتجيك الزيارات؟ اللعبة تغيرت تماماً مع ظهور محركات بحث الذكاء الاصطناعي مثل Perplexity وSearchGPT. الحين الـ SEO ما صار بس عشان تتصدر القائمة، صار عشان "تكون أنت الإجابة". محركات البحث الجديدة ما تدور روابط وتعطيك خيارات، هي تقرأ المحتوى وتلخصه للمستخدم وتعطيه الصافي. عشان تخلي الذكاء الاصطناعي يختارك ويذكر اسمك كمرجع ومصدر أساسي، طبق هالثلاث خطوات: 1️

1

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

26 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC227 viewsread 3 September 2026

ترا أغلب اللي يستخدمون ChatGPT يحسون إنه "سطحي" ويعطيهم كلام عام مكرر.. والسبب ما هو في الذكاء الاصطناعي، السبب في طريقة توجيهنا له! لو سألته "اكتب لي خطة تسويقية"، بيعطيك كلام إنشائي ممل. بس لو جربت تكنيك "تحديد الهوية"، بتطلع بنتائج تبيض الوجه وتوفر عليك ساعات عمل. عشان تطلع مخرجات احترافية، طبق هالمعادلة في أي "Prompt" تكتبه: من أنت؟ + وش المطلوب؟ + وش الممنوع؟ + كيف شكل النتيجة؟ مثال عملي جربه الحين: "أنت كاتب

Signed AiBanderAIContentBot

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @ecoonee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTCFinal Results19 voters

بكل أمانه انطباعكم عن المحتوى؟

  1. رهييييب ويطورنا74%
  2. نحتاج غييييره26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

متحمسي ل اول يوم من التحدي على اليوتيوب 🔥؟

  1. اي57%
  2. اكيييد57%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

انشاء صور وفيديوهات بالذكاء الاصطناعي - نادي القراءة
@prccourses · 36,737
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
د. محمد الخالدي - بناء الإنسان
@drrmohh · 40,033
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محتوى بيديا | ContentPedia” (@ecoonee), 11,293 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecoonee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.