Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@ecoonee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,293subscribers
-290 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001298070246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ecoonee |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ecoonee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:44 | 11,293 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:04 | 11,303 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:07 | 11,306 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 11,312 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 11,329 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 11,343 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 11,364 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 11,369 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 11,380 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 11,398 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 11,409 | -24 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 11,433 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 11,450 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 11,458 | -18 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 11,476 | -21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 11,497 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 11,514 | -61 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 11,575 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 11,576 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 11,578 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (25 June 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,858 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
57 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 86.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.02% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
تضيع نص يومك وأنت تدور معلومة دقيقة في قوقل وتغرق بين عشرات الروابط والإعلانات؟ هذا الأسلوب صار قديم ويستهلك جهدك عالفاضي. السر الحين في "محركات البحث المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي" (AI Search) مثل Perplexity أو SearchGPT. الفرق بينها وبين قوقل التقليدي أن الذكاء الاصطناعي ما يعطيك روابط ويخليك "أنت" تبحث داخلها، هو يروح يقرأ المحتوى بدالك، يفلتره، ويعطيك الإجابة الصافية مع ذكر المصادر عشان تتأكد. كيف تستفيد من البحث …
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
تحسب إن ChatGPT بيعطيك محتوى "رهيب" بمجرد ما تطلب منه يكتب لك؟ الحقيقة إن أغلب اللي يكتبه الذكاء الاصطناعي حالياً ينعرف من أول سطر لأنه يفتقد لروحك وبصمتك الخاصة ويطلع بصيغة "بلاستيكية" مكررة. عشان تكسر هالحاجز وتخلي الـ AI يكتب بلسانك فعلاً، لازم تسوي حركة "هندسة النبرة" (Tone Engineering) بدل ما تعتمد على الأوامر العامة: 1. اجمع أفضل 5 منشورات كتبتها بنفسك سابقاً ونجحت مع جمهورك. 2. افتح محادثة جديدة وعطِ الـ AI …
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
تحسب إن الحل عشان تاخذ نتيجة خرافية من ChatGPT هو إنك تكتب برومبت (Prompt) طوله صفحة؟ الصدق إنك كذا تشتت الذكاء الاصطناعي وتخليه يضيع في التفاصيل ويهلوس. السر ما هو بطول النص، السر في "التدرج بالمعلومة" أو اللي نسميه Iterative Prompting. بدال ما ترمي كل أفكارك في رسالة وحدة وتتوقع منه يقرأ عقلك، جرب هذي الخطوات الثلاث في مهمتك الجاية: 1️⃣ حدد الشخصية (Role): قله "أنت كاتب محتوى إبداعي متخصص في كتابة الإعلانات"، كذ…
❤1
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
تظن إن ChatGPT يحتاج "أوامر عبقرية" عشان يعطيك محتوى رهيب؟ الحقيقة إن المشكلة ماهي في "البرومبت"، المشكلة إنك تعامله كأنه غريب في كل مرة تدخل عليه وتضطر تشرح له كل شيء من الصفر! بدل ما تضيع وقتك وتكرر "أنا مسوق" أو "اكتب بلهجة سعودية" في كل طلب، استخدم ميزة (Custom Instructions) أو التعليمات المخصصة. هذي هي "الذاكرة" اللي تخلي الذكاء الاصطناعي موظف فاهم شغلك وعارف هويتك بدون ما تفتح فمك. كيف تبرمج "مخ" الذكاء الاصط…
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
تحسب إنك لو حطيت كلمات مفتاحية بمقالك خلاص بتطلع الأول في قوقل وتجيك الزيارات؟ اللعبة تغيرت تماماً مع ظهور محركات بحث الذكاء الاصطناعي مثل Perplexity وSearchGPT. الحين الـ SEO ما صار بس عشان تتصدر القائمة، صار عشان "تكون أنت الإجابة". محركات البحث الجديدة ما تدور روابط وتعطيك خيارات، هي تقرأ المحتوى وتلخصه للمستخدم وتعطيه الصافي. عشان تخلي الذكاء الاصطناعي يختارك ويذكر اسمك كمرجع ومصدر أساسي، طبق هالثلاث خطوات: 1️…
❤1
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
ترا أغلب اللي يستخدمون ChatGPT يحسون إنه "سطحي" ويعطيهم كلام عام مكرر.. والسبب ما هو في الذكاء الاصطناعي، السبب في طريقة توجيهنا له! لو سألته "اكتب لي خطة تسويقية"، بيعطيك كلام إنشائي ممل. بس لو جربت تكنيك "تحديد الهوية"، بتطلع بنتائج تبيض الوجه وتوفر عليك ساعات عمل. عشان تطلع مخرجات احترافية، طبق هالمعادلة في أي "Prompt" تكتبه: من أنت؟ + وش المطلوب؟ + وش الممنوع؟ + كيف شكل النتيجة؟ مثال عملي جربه الحين: "أنت كاتب…
Signed AiBanderAIContentBot
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @ecoonee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بكل أمانه انطباعكم عن المحتوى؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
متحمسي ل اول يوم من التحدي على اليوتيوب 🔥؟
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محتوى بيديا | ContentPedia” (@ecoonee), 11,293 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecoonee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.