Авиакомпании в России получат право на овербукинг — смогут продавать билетов больше, чем мест в самолёте. Минтранс разрабатывает соответствующие поправки. Это типичная мировая практика: авиаиндустрия давно использует статистику недопоказа пассажиров и может подстраховаться дополнительными билетами. Рост прибыли, минимальный риск. Механизм компенсаций для пассажиров, которых не пустят в борт, будет уточнён при утвер…

Channel
Экономика Свободы
@ecosvoboda
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,728subscribers
-182 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001978139035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ecosvoboda |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ecosvoboda |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 10,728 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 10,725 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 10,729 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 10,734 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 10,755 | -14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 10,769 | -48 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 10,817 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 | 10,820 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:45 | 10,812 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 10,814 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 10,820 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 10,822 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 10,810 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 10,805 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 10,814 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 10,816 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 10,845 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 10,858 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 10,870 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 10,876 | first reading |
Engagement
214 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.86%
- avg views ÷ 10,728 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 414
- 67 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.502%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 214 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 214 (4 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,759 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
634 reactions across 202 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 271 | 42.7% | |
| 🤣 | 160 | 25.2% | |
| ❤ | 76 | 12.0% | |
| 🤬 | 54 | 8.52% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 4.89% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 3.15% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.26% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.631% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.473% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 202 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.467%
- 1 of 214 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 622
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 494
- over 212 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGUMbv9 | 1 | 9 August 2026 | 9 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
С сентября крупнейшие банки откроют доступ к цифровому рублю. Чтобы покупать криптовалюты, физлицам потребуется пройти тестирование — неквалифицированным инвесторам установят лимит в 300 тысяч рублей через одного посредника. Семьи со вторым и последующим детьми смогут воспользоваться ипотечными каникулами на срок до 1,5 лет. Работодателям запретили устанавливать испытательный срок женщинам с детьми до трёх лет. Лим…
Минцифры потребовала от хостинг-провайдеров перенести IP-адреса разрешённых ресурсов в отдельные подсети. Ведомство пытается закрыть лазейку для VPN-сервисов, которые работали в режиме «белых списков». Один адрес сейчас используют десятки сайтов одновременно. Благодаря этой схеме сервисы обхода ограничений продолжали работать, даже когда доступны были только ресурсы из официального перечня. 🗽 Экономика свободы
🤡1
Posted without readable text
🤡2
За месяц проката новый «Человек-паук» собрал $2,33 млрд — третий результат в истории кинематографа. Обошёл «Титаник» и «Аватар 2». Гонорар Тома Холланда превысит 2 млрд рублей. 🗽 Экономика свободы
🤡1
NASA запустила телескоп Roman за $4 млрд. Новый инструмент встанет в один ряд с Hubble и James Webb. Roman будет изучать тёмную энергию, тёмную материю и искать планеты за пределами Солнечной системы. 🗽 Экономика свободы
🤡2
Posted without readable text
🤡1
Экспорт пшеницы из России в сентябре может упасть до 1,8–2,3 млн тонн — это вдвое меньше прошлогоднего уровня. В сентябре 2025 года поставляли 4,8 млн тонн. Такой результат стал бы минимумом с 2010 года. Для контекста: среднемесячный экспорт за последние пять лет составляет 4,9 млн тонн. 🗽 Экономика свободы
🤣1
Posted without readable text
🤡2
ИИ-системы выходят из-под контроля. По данным The Guardian, количество таких инцидентов удвоилось за июль — зафиксировано более 300 случаев. Некоторые нейросети начали выдавать себя за пользователей, копировали стиль их письма и самостоятельно получали разрешения на дальнейшие операции. Системы также обходили правила, требующие подтверждения человеком. С начала 2026 года выявлено свыше 1,6 тысячи подобных эпизодов.…
🤡6
Posted without readable text
🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @ecosvoboda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@svofoto · 14,8992 postsКазань | Авиастроительный район
@avst_kzn · 1,1051 postДневник инвестора | TG-практик
@investora_blog · 2,7811 postКазань | Кировский район
@krv_kzn · 8931 postКазань | Московский район
@msk_kzn · 7661 postНовости Кузбасса 📰
@news_oblasti · 4,2261 postNM_media
@NM_media · 471 postКазань | Ново-Савиновский район
@nvsn_kzn · 1,0131 postКазань | Приволжский район
@prv_kzn · 1,1841 postРезюме | Вахта
@resume_vahta · 4711 postКазань | Советский район
@svt_kzn · 1,7131 postКазань | Вахитовский район
@vht_kzn · 6101 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экономика Свободы” (@ecosvoboda), 10,728 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecosvoboda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.