Channel
@ectsycooks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
180subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322466874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ectsycooks |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ectsycooks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 180 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 29.5% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 15.2% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 6.67% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 12 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3uiAoeg1rihi7Ur5vYCzfkK9X1C7S9Nernu9sAUxpump I have bought this, tiktok trend “bob” of some weird spiky wig that dances around. can see some sort of cult form around it maybe with different colored wigs? that’s my vision for it but maybe I’m wrong. Even if I am tho, mindshare is enough to move this decently, it’s pretty viral, good bid for me at 30k mcap.
❤3😍1
hello. will use this as a journal/log from now on. Will share thoughts, trades I take, ect. everything I share is NFA and is just my perspective on things. funded a freshie with 50sol. let’s see where we are soon!
❤7🆒2👻1
almost 2x 😋
❤5
doubling down on this here at 190k. multiple coins which should logically be betas to veo3 are sitting at multi millions. bigfoot vlogs, animal ai, ect, were all generated using veo3 technology. the ceiling for this is very high. wouldn't be suprised to see this go to millions, very fast.
🔥5
hearings things af…. might or might not be financial advice 🤷♂️
https://time.com/7290050/veo-3-google-misinformation-deepfake/
B1Uz83yQC3aphKk8EdZ53VFWkQb9o6DKFWG3xRKopump this should do numbers aswell. New google VEO3 AI model, being used across all socials to generate realistic animal videos. Also started the viral prompt theory and so on. good rr here at 170k.
❤5👎1
40x!
🤡2❤1
took a nice bid on $BABY here. funny og meme, should cook, hearin things bout the team too. HWUz6CoWfdBgLwbaqrR3X8TnL9GX64MawmtGiWvApump
🤡3
raped
🤣2😨2👎1
taking a bid on mr roboto here, elon tweet frontrun, tesla tweeted earlier, and so did elon a couple weeks ago, should cook a couple M’s 7K24mBiSdCdgok4KhWAGJDbXRZKfi7hee3qwgb2qpump
👎2❤1
https://t.me/executiveorderchat EO community chat, pull up
👍4👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ectsycooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ectsy’s cooks” (@ectsycooks), 180 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ectsycooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.