Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 13 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,149–7,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 19:58
7,159
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:22
7,162
+11
13 Aug 2026, 08:48
7,151
-6
10 Aug 2026, 12:26
7,157
-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:31
7,159
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:24
7,159
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
275.2%
avg views ÷ 7,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,700
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.222%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
23 (7 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
78,800
Reactions total
175
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
998 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
409
41.0%
👍
339
34.0%
❤
131
13.1%
⚡
115
11.5%
🥰
4
0.401%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 998reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Смотришь на сегодняшний рынок - и как-будто читаешь самого себя ровно месяц назад:
▪️ https://t.me/ecworldtech/303
Те же уровни, те же эмоции. Те же физики покупали-покупали акции, и вот их снова отвезли на маржин-коллы / убытки.
Сегодня (см. графики) с утра была очередная попытка купить акции. И потом пошла продажа с убытком сегодняшних позиций, вчерашних, позавчерашних …
Раньше финансовая история ходила по круг…
Российский индекс акций падает уже более чем на -4%.
Прям очень сильно падаем. Даже статистика это подчеркивает: за период стремительного апрельско-июльского падения таких дней было всего 2.
За два дня упали более чем на -7%. Волей-неволей вспоминается старая загадка: "Массово продают все активы и уезжают из страны. Угадай, почему?".
| подписывайтесь на @ecworldtech
| технологии для инвестиций
Инсайдеры еще позавчера начали продавать, а вчера почти рекордно активно лили - ну, и закономерно, что сегодня российский рынок акций снова падает почти на -3%.
Ребята (ключевые участники, инсайдеры) в курсе, какие риски приближаются и знают, как график индекса / акций будет выглядеть в будущем. А частный инвестор Алёша - смотрит только на текущий график, а о том, что страну ждет завтра, он не задумывается (так прощ…
Банк России снизил ключевую ставку до 14% вопреки ожиданиям рынка. ЦБ пересмотрел ключевую ставку вниз на 25 б.п. Это десятое подряд снижение в текущем цикле смягчения денежно-кредитной политики. (с) РБК
Логика прикрытия спекулятивного шорта у 213.000 по фьючерсу прямо перед заседанием оказалась верной.
Шорт-сквиз на фоне очередного импульса аппетита у физиков (как реакция на новую ставку). Рынок обновил локальные …
Физики (толпа, частные инвесторы) - как обычно: на новостях о встрече глав "МИД" России и США погнали пылесосить акции как не в себя.
Позавчера дали аванс на работе. Деньги надо срочно тратить.
Индекс Мосбиржи сегодня снова прибавляет в моменте +3% - движение идет в рамках прогноза понедельника.
| подписывайтесь на @ecworldtech
| технологии для инвестиций
Российский рынок акций сегодня подрастет на +3,5% в моменте. И движение идет в рамках вчерашнего прогноза отбоя от предыдущей достигнутой, наконец, среднесрочной цели падения и поддержки в 1.900 пунктов. Рынок техничен, как никогда.
А частные инвесторы (толпа, физики) предсказуемы, как никогда. Вчера они набрали рекордный объем Сбера. Сегодня снова покупают его больше остальных фишек (см. зеленые графики Сантимента …
Только стоп-торги на бирже помогут победить "финансовую грамотность" россиян.
P.S. На самом деле, 2-3 дня падения по 5% могли заставить Мосбиржу посмотреть в эту сторону (временно остановить торги). Единственное, что помешало бы, - предстоящие сентябрьские выборы. Так что, ждём октября-ноября.
| подписывайтесь на @ecworldtech
| технологии для инвестиций
🔻 Российский рынок акций - Индекс Мосбиржи - упал ниже 2.000 пунктов (до 1994 пункта).
Индекс РТС упал до 800 пунктов. Это значения августа 2005 года (почти 21 год "отрицательных инвестиций").
Газпром возвращается к минимумам 25-летней давности (и это в рублях; в долларах же - мы уже ~ на уровне цен "проклятых 90-ых"). Сегодня официально в рублях прошли ниже минимумов кризиса 2008-2009 годов. Кстати, поздравляю дер…
Связь вернулась. Теперь нужно время, чтобы некоторые котировки подтянулись (большая часть уже актуальна).
| подписывайтесь на @ecworldtech
| технологии для инвестиций
Временно "умер" один из крупнейших провайдеров / поставщиков услуг и положил большую часть инета / сайтов.
Так что, потребуется какое-то время, чтобы ECWORLD.TECH снова заработал.
P.S. Извините. Не виноватая я. (с)
| подписывайтесь на @ecworldtech
| технологии для инвестиций
Каждый оборот рынка эта история с обнулением частных инвесторов (толпы) повторяется.
Вот и в этот раз: набирали-набирали акции Газпрома по 300- 370 рублей (на последней фазе), теперь по 90 рублей продают [с убытком].
Точно так же в 2008-2009 годах [с убытком] продавали Сбербанк по 15-30 рублей, набрав его за пару лет до этого по 80-110 рублей. И потом этих инвесторов больше никогда не было на рынке. Ну, или очень и…
👍26⚡7🔥6❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ecworldtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну, что? Сделаем 1.900 по ММВБ и к сентябрьским выборам порастем?
неее, рост прямо отсюда, от 2.100, и уже завтра6%
ага, порастем перед выборами, но сначала сходим на 1.90023%
нет, продолжим падать до сентябрьских выборов и после39%
не торгую российский рынок, не в курсе32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 188,122 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ECWORLD: экономика, прогнозы @ecworld · 65,131 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ECWORLD.TECH | Технологии для инвестиций” (@ecworldtech), 7,159 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecworldtech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
