Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #666ᯤ̸

Channel

#666ᯤ̸

@ecxvo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

499subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002788646557
TypeChannel
Username@ecxvo
Created28 July 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ecxvo

Growth

492499495.513 August 2026 — 492 subscribers13 August 2026 — 493 subscribers21 August 2026 — 496 subscribers28 August 2026 — 499 subscribers13 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 491–500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:48499+3
21 Aug 2026, 09:16496+3
13 Aug 2026, 13:58493+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:03492first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.5%
avg views ÷ 499 subscribers
Avg views / post
307
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
56.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held8 (28 July 202512 August 2026)
Views total2,149
Reactions total1,221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,221 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532564684588241118216413.4%
custom 532588132103200286116213.3%
custom 532571374429301418215812.9%
custom 532558361966884638015412.6%
custom 540936781445466235315412.6%
custom 532802286474023252615212.4%
custom 603755566681240817914812.1%
custom 532828149908086333012910.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC314 views176 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The Queen of Hadith

custom 532571374429301418231custom 532564684588241118229custom 532588132103200286125custom 540936781445466235323custom 532558361966884638021custom 603755566681240817919custom 532802286474023252618custom 532828149908086333010

12 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC318 views183 reactionsread 13 August 2026

"The people who said "forever" often become the reason you stop believing in that word."

custom 532588132103200286129custom 603755566681240817928custom 532802286474023252626custom 532564684588241118223custom 532558361966884638021custom 540936781445466235321custom 532828149908086333020custom 532571374429301418215

12 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC318 views186 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"The saddest prison has no walls. It's built from memories you can't escape."

custom 532564684588241118228custom 532828149908086333028custom 540936781445466235326custom 532558361966884638025custom 532571374429301418223custom 532588132103200286123custom 532802286474023252617custom 603755566681240817916

12 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC302 views171 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"Some graves are filled with bodies. Others are filled with promises that were never kept."

custom 603755566681240817930custom 540936781445466235326custom 532802286474023252625custom 532564684588241118221custom 532588132103200286120custom 532558361966884638019custom 532571374429301418215custom 532828149908086333015

12 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC302 views166 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"The loneliest feeling isn't being alone. It's realizing no one notices you've disappeared inside yourself."

custom 532828149908086333028custom 532588132103200286124custom 532802286474023252624custom 532571374429301418221custom 540936781445466235321custom 532558361966884638019custom 603755566681240817915custom 532564684588241118214

12 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC300 views178 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"Some people spend their whole lives searching for peace, while carrying the very chaos they blame on others."

custom 532558361966884638034custom 532571374429301418231custom 532564684588241118226custom 603755566681240817922custom 532802286474023252618custom 532588132103200286116custom 532828149908086333016custom 540936781445466235315

12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC295 views161 reactionsread 13 August 2026

"The most dangerous lies are the ones people tell themselves just to survive another day."

custom 532588132103200286125custom 532802286474023252624custom 532564684588241118223custom 532571374429301418222custom 540936781445466235322custom 603755566681240817918custom 532558361966884638015custom 532828149908086333012

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ecxvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#666ᯤ̸” (@ecxvo), 499 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecxvo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.