Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 👩‍💻Edicola HACKING - News, Guide & Cyber Security🏴‍☠️

Channel

👩‍💻Edicola HACKING - News, Guide & Cyber Security🏴‍☠️

@edicola_hacking

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,337subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001317294811
TypeChannel
Username@edicola_hacking
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edicola_hacking

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3361,3391,337.523 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,338 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,336 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,337 subscribers1,33723 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 26 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,336–1,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:211,337+1
10 Sept 2026, 09:181,336-3
29 Aug 2026, 18:151,339+1
27 Aug 2026, 01:561,338-1
23 Aug 2026, 06:151,339no change
23 Aug 2026, 06:011,339first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 11 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2524.3%
😁109.71%
👏98.74%
🤣98.74%
🤨87.77%
🤮87.77%
❤76.80%
🤬54.85%
⚡43.88%
👌32.91%
👨‍💻32.91%
🔥21.94%
😨21.94%
🤡21.94%
✍10.971%
🍌10.971%
👎10.971%
👾10.971%
🖕10.971%
🤷‍♂10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2024 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026

👁 L’OMBRA DI EPSTEIN: OLTRE IL SILENZIO Potere, Ricatti e il Controllo del Futuro Il caso Epstein non è mai stato "solo" una storia di abusi. Le ultime evidenze emerse tra la fine del 2025 e l'inizio del 2026 rivelano una rete di influenza sistemica che ha collegato l'abisso della pedofilia ai vertici della finanza, della politica e delle nuove tecnologie. ♟️ IL TRIANGOLO DEL POTERE: TRUMP, BANNON E IL NETWORK Men…

❤3👏3👍2

21 Apr 2025, 09:07 UTC≈2,140 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🔹 I "grazie" di ChatGPT costano decine di milioni di dollari Le comuni cortesie digitali come "grazie" e "prego" scambiate con i chatbot stanno generando costi milionari per le aziende. Secondo quanto rivelato da Sam Altman, CEO di OpenAI, queste brevi interazioni di cortesia con ChatGPT costano all'azienda "decine di milioni di dollari" annualmente solo per elaborare risposte a formule di cortesia. Nonostante l'imp…

👌3😁3❤1👍1

31 Jan 2025, 07:07 UTC≈2,230 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

⛔️Il Garante della Privacy blocca DeepSeek in Italia Disposta con effetto immediato la limitazione del trattamento dei dati degli utenti italiani da parte del chatbot AI delle società cinesi Hangzhou e Beijing DeepSeek. Fonte

🤨4

5 Dec 2024, 19:14 UTC≈2,660 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇺 La Commissione Europea ha ordinato alla piattaforma TikTok di conservare tutti i dati sul funzionamento dei propri sistemi di raccomandazione in relazione alle elezioni in Romania La Commissione Europea ha detto di aver ordinato a TikTok di conservare questi dati per accertamenti sugli eventuali «rischi sistemici» che la piattaforma e i suoi meccanismi potrebbero rappresentare per i processi elettorali all’intern…

👍5

20 Oct 2024, 19:46 UTC≈2,610 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026

♻️UPDATE: Il sistema che blocca il pezzotto ha bloccato per tre ore Google Drive. Un errore grave che ha coinvolto domini su cui “gira” anche Youtube. La dimensione dell’errore è davvero clamorosa. E se non ha avuto conseguenze per la vita di centinaia di migliaia di persone è solo perché è successo di sabato sera. Piracy Shield, il sistema che ferma il pezzotto e abbatte i siti che trasmettono illegalmente le parti…

🤣5🍌1👍1😁1

20 Oct 2024, 16:45 UTC≈1,730 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🔐 Hacker arrestato per l’attacco al Ministero di Giustizia: aveva le password di 46 pm Carmelo Miano, arrestato con l’accusa di avere violato i server del dicastero, era in possesso delle password di 46 magistrati, tra cui anche quelle dei procuratori di Perugia e Firenze. All'hacker arrestato dalla Polizia Postale, alla luce degli approfondimenti investigativi coordinate dalla Procura di Napoli, si contesta di aver…

👏2👎1🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @edicola_hacking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DeepWeb
@DeepWebITA · 56,878
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👩‍💻Edicola HACKING - News, Guide & Cyber Security🏴‍☠️” (@edicola_hacking), 1,337 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edicola_hacking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.